Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Amit Roy: Portland Hospital's Indian baby ties

IN CHOOSING to have their baby at the Portland Hospital in London – confirmed in Archie’s birth certificate – the Duke and Duchess of Sussex were merely following the example of a number of prominent Indians, among them Lord Swraj Paul’s family.

“I have not had a baby there for some time,” joked Swraj, 88.


He added that his daughter Anjli used the Portland when she had her children, Shalin and Shaila.

Swraj, who lives five minutes’ walk from the hospital, said: “It’s a very good maternity hospital.”

Anjli confirmed: “It was more than 30 years ago, but it’s a lovely hospital. My nephew has just had his baby there.”

Meghan did not have her baby at home at Frogmore Cottage in Windsor, as she had apparently wanted, but in hospital because of possible complications she might have faced

with the delivery at the age of 37, it was widely reported.

Sunit Ghatak, who was a gynaecologist in private practice based at the Portland for more than 35 years until he retired in 2016, said it was in many ways “a celebrity hospital”. He spelt out the pros and cons of a home versus a hospital birth.

“In the rich families in Calcutta in the old days, there were home births. A birth is a natural thing and even forceps were used, which we wouldn’t today,” he said.

“It is a safe method of delivery for ladies where medically there are no contra-indications, such as blood pressure, diabetes and pre-eclampsia.

But elderly mothers – anyone over 35 – had better avoid this. On the plus side, it is very satisfying for a lady to have her family around at the time of the birth.”

But in the case of someone like Meghan, the risks can outweigh possible advantages, he suggested.

Ghatak, whose son is the wellknown actor, Raj Ghatak, emphasised: “If there is foetal distress all of a sudden, transferring to a hospital for an instrumental delivery may

take some time to arrange.

“Caesarean section must not be done at home. Haemorrhage during or soon after may be a life-threatening hazard.

“And the baby may need extra help soon after birth, which at home can be a problem.”

More For You

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

A billboard featuring Narendra Modi and Sir Keir Starmer welcomes the British leader along a street in Mumbai

Why did media ignore Starmer’s India success?

THERE has been very little substantive coverage of Sir Keir Starmer’s first visit to India as prime minister in the British press.

One paper ignored the visit altogether, preferring to devote three pages to something it considered far more important – David and Victoria Beckham. There was also the regular instalment of just how awful Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is, especially when compared to Kate, the Princess of Wales. One paper did have a story, but it was about how Starmer would not liberalise visas for India.

Keep ReadingShow less