Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘After 100 years, saying sorry would be little more than a hollow gesture’

by ROSHAN DOUG

AN OFFICIAL apology for the Amritsar massacre is something some Indians have been seeking from the British government since 1919.


The most recent voices have come in the form of Indian writers Arundhati Roy and Shashi Tharoor, and also the London mayor, Sadiq Khan.

On the centenary of the incident this weekend, it’s worth considering the merits and the politics of such a request.

In some ways, we can see an apology as an attempt by the former colonial power to distance itself from its previous stance of superiority. An apology by its very nature, is an attempt to draw a line; after all, it was 100 years ago. It would be a sign of Britain’s desire to enter into a relationship of equals.

An acknowledgement might also free India from the burden of victimhood. Once due attention has been paid, it would allow both nations to adopt a forward-looking perspective less tinted by the ghosts of the past.

However, apart from the abstract, I am not convinced an apology would serve any useful purpose. This is partly because apologising on behalf of someone else is a Christian idea – that somehow we can pay for the sins of others. In Hinduism, only the people directly involved in the sin can redeem themselves.

The apology would also be layered with politics. Conceding there was an error of judgement leaves the British establishment in an awkward position diplomatically. Conversely, ignoring this demand also leaves Britain open to the charge of arrogance and heartlessness.

Personally, I don’t know what an apology achieves. Who exactly is apologising and for what? Does anyone in Britain have the legitimacy, the authority, to apologise for what occurred before their grandparents were even born? Should – and can – we hold future generations responsible for our mistakes today?

Instead, both sides have settled – unofficially – for a half-way house where Britain uses the word ‘regret’ which acknowledges a failure but shunts off individual responsibility. Any apology without responsibility is tokenistic and, therefore, ultimately redundant.

Despite this, other Indians have even raised the question of reparations.

This, too, is an oversimplification. What price do you put on a life? Should it differentiate between people working and not working; men and women, babies, toddlers and children? The very thought of putting some kind of monetary figure on life is abhorrent. The implication that if the British apologise and pay money then everything will be forgiven is offensive to all victims.

In reality, an apology and reparations, after a century, would be little more than hollow and superficial acts of diplomatic palliation or political assuagement.

  • Dr Roshan Doug is a reader in education at the University of Birmingham.

More For You

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Vicky Kaushal in 'Chhaava'

Chhaava

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

UK SHOW IS A SHOCKER

THE recent Rewind Queens tour was an absolute shocker. The concerts had already been postponed from 2024 due to Alka Yagnik’s severe illness, yet organisers likely knew she wouldn’t be able to perform in the January shows in London and Birmingham – but only announced her absence days before.

Keep ReadingShow less
Cohesion and anti-racism: Two sides of the same coin

Access to opportunities can affect attitudes to immigration across Britain

Cohesion and anti-racism: Two sides of the same coin

SIX months have passed since the evil murders in Southport triggered six days of senseless violence.

Rioters terrified Muslim worshippers at the town’s mosque, tried to burn asylum seekers alive at a Rotherham hotel, and spread fear among ethnic minorities across the country by posting targets for a pogrom of future violence.

Keep ReadingShow less
​Himesh Reshammiya's silly quest for acting stardom

Himesh Reshammiya

​Himesh Reshammiya's silly quest for acting stardom

IN THE early 1950s, legendary music icon Mukesh was so desperate to become a leading man that he stopped singing for major movies to focus on making an acting breakthrough.

Decades later, Sonu Nigam also tried his hand at acting by starring in a few films. What these two singing stars had in common was that they both failed as actors and quickly realised when to stop. Both quit acting, concentrated on music, and went on to have incredible singing careers.

Keep ReadingShow less
Reeves set to revise non-doms tax rules

Rachel Reeves

Reeves set to revise non-doms tax rules

ANY day now Rachel Reeves will be sending a “cease and desist” letter to Liz Truss, demanding that the former prime minister stop saying she has “crashed the economy”.

Such “false and defamatory” allegations were harming her political reputation, the chancellor will probably add.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment
Saif Ali Khan
Saif Ali Khan

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

COMIC SINGH IN UK

PUNJABI-language stand-up comedian Manpreet Singh will return to the UK in March for a series of shows at Midlands Arts Centre in Birmingham (21), The Urban Building in Slough (22), and Chutney Ivy in Leicester (23). Affectionately known as Comic Singh, the top Indian talent promises a performance powered by family-friendly humour. He will follow up the UK tour with his first-ever shows in Germany and Holland in April.

Keep ReadingShow less