Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

When will Britain's minorities realise the power of their vote?

By Simon Woolley

Operation Black Vote


FOR OVER 20 years people have been telling me that voting doesn’t make a difference. I’m often told that, “if voting could make a difference they’d ban it”.

It’s a clever, smug, supposedly an anti-authoritarian response, but nothing could be further from the truth.

Even with an electoral system that could easily be brought into the 21st century, with automatic voter registration, digital and proportional voting, the system still allows for great upsets on a local and national scale.

For example, the last two elections have either had no overall winner, hence the 2010 coalition government, or the Conservative Party's David Cameron’s victory in 2015 was won with a mere majority of 12, out of 650 parliamentary seats.

The present prime minister Theresa May, has called an election precisely because she has concluded that going into Brexit negotiations with the slimmest of majorities leaves her incredibly vulnerable, not least from her own party Brexit detractors.

The black vote becomes increasingly powerful once we fully realise that many parliamentary seats are won and lost by a few hundred or a few thousand votes - most parliamentary constituencies have an electoral of more than 50,000.

In 2015, the seats highlighted were won or lost by a few hundred votes, all of these areas have significant BME populations, and could have swayed which the vote went: Derby North (41 votes), City of Chester (93 votes), Croydon Central (165), Ealing Central and Acton (274), Bury North (378), Halifax (428), and Brentford and Isleworth (465).

Another way of looking at the potential power of the BME vote is through the Brexit lens. Whether you voted to leave or stay, and most BME communities voted to stay, the vote was won more 1.2 million votes. Sounds a lot until you realise that 13 million people didn’t vote . Many young men and women particularly from BME communities didn’t vote, and there vote might have changed history.

So the question is now, in the six weeks running up to the General Elections, will we fully realise the power of the BME vote? If we do, then we can force political parties and therefore the next government to ensure any Brexit negociations do not disproportionately impact negatively on BME communities.

For example, some of the EU employment rights, such as holidays, working hours and maternity leave have the biggest impact on poorer people, to which we make up large numbers. These things affect us and therefore we should act.

If we do act, by registering to vote and voting we can effectively demand that any incoming government undertake a comprehensive race equality strategy. For example, one that will close the grossly unequal unemployment gaps, which not only affect all young BME individuals but also BME graduates too.

Other areas include housing, health, and middle or top business management, all of which are subject to race penalties.

In so many ways this has been an extremely turbulent year: Brexit, the election of Donald Trump as US president and the unprecedented rise of xenophobia and Islamaphobia. Worse still, it’s not over yet. Even if the Brexit discussions go better than expected, the road ahead will be a very bumpy ride.

If they go badly it could be an economic disaster .

And if we do fall again into recession as we did almost a decade ago, austerity and more austerity will be not only be blamed on immigrants and BME communities but also we’ll be hardest when local and national policies austerity policies are rolled out.

Our goal in this democratic discussion must be first and foremost to demonstrate our political power and a clear frame work for greater racial justice.

If first step must be register to vote in huge numbers and show political parties we’ll be a big political player.

Interestingly, the BME vote doesn’t need to be overtly party political, but we do have demonstrate that we will vote and that we have a set of demands.

This approach will ensure that voting will make a difference. And what a fantastic difference it will make.: More BME MPs, councillors, our young men and women in work, and not with those zero hour contracts.

More BME business leaders inspiration a generation to follow. When we vote and demand, our civil rights voices actually give a frame work of decency and values to which all society benefits.

I hope more than ever our communities fully realise the power of our collective BME vote.

More For You

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

The life sciences and science tech sectors more widely continue to see out migration of companies

iStock

Will government inaction on science, trade & innovation cost the UK its economic future?

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE

As the government wrestles with market backlash and deep business concern from early economic decisions, the layers of economic complexity are building.

The Independent reported earlier in January on the government watchdog’s own assessment of the cost of Brexit - something which is still being fully weighed up, but their estimates show that “the economy will take a 15 per cent hit to trade in the long term”. Bloomberg Economics valued the impact to date (in 2023) at £100bn in lost output each year - values and impact which must be read alongside the now over-reported and repetitively stated “black hole” in government finances, being used to rationalise decisions which are already proving damaging.

Keep ReadingShow less
Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

Deep love for laughter

Pooja K

MY JOURNEY with comedy has been deeply intertwined with personal growth, grief, and selfdiscovery. It stems from learning acceptance and gradually rebuilding the self-confidence I had completely lost over the last few years.

After the sudden and tragic loss of my father to Covid, I was overwhelmed with grief and depression. I had just finished recording a video for my YouTube channel when I received the devastating news. That video was part of a comedy series about how people were coping with lockdown in different ways.

Keep ReadingShow less
UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Values, inner apartheid, and diet

The author at Mandela-Gandhi Exhibition, Constitution Hill, Johannesburg, South Africa (December 2024)

Values, inner apartheid, and diet

Dr. Prabodh Mistry

In the UK, local governments have declared a Climate Emergency, but I struggle to see any tangible changes made to address it. Our daily routines remain unchanged, with roads and shops as crowded as ever, and life carrying on as normal with running water and continuous power in our homes. All comforts remain at our fingertips, and more are continually added. If anything, the increasing abundance of comfort is dulling our lives by disconnecting us from nature and meaningful living.

I have just spent a month in South Africa, visiting places where Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela lived, including the jails. They both fought against the Apartheid laws imposed by the white ruling community. However, no oppressor ever grants freedom to the oppressed unless the latter rises to challenge the status quo. This was true in South Africa, just as it was in India. Mahatma Gandhi united the people of India to resist British rule for many years, but it was the threat posed by the Indian army, returning from the Second World War and inspired by the leadership of Subhas Chandra Bose, that ultimately won independence. In South Africa, the threat of violence led by Nelson Mandela officially ended Apartheid in April 1994, when Mandela was sworn in as the country’s first Black president.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less