Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Why UK groups should not mirror Middle East tension

Why UK groups should not mirror Middle East tension

By Imam Qari Asim and Rabbi Laura Janner-Klausner

WHEN we look at the situation in Gaza- Palestine-Israel, we see tragedy after tragedy. With every death our hearts ache. With every violation of human rights comes rightful condemnation.


Holy sites, mosques and synagogues are being desecrated; in turn, these are dese­crating God’s name. Until an independent sovereign Palestine sits alongside an inde­pendent sovereign Israel, we must continue to raise our voices for change and against violation of human rights.

As violence erupted and shattered lives in the Middle East recently, many people told us they feel they are being silenced, that they cannot share their thoughts with­out being shouted down or shamed. They feel dialogue will only bring further tension and more anger between UK-based com­munities, particularly British Muslims and British Jews.

As an imam and a rabbi, we believe in robust, difficult and uncomfortable conver­sations; that ultimately people are good, and want to improve the situation, and cer­tainly not cause more harm.

Where is there a space for discussion and to be able to ask questions in good faith without ricochets of verbal shrapnel hitting back at us? How can Jews and Muslims, and anyone who wants to talk about Israel-Pal­estine-Gaza, avoid importing the battle lines from Gaza to Greenwich, from Bethle­hem to Birmingham and from the Temple Mount to the Thames?

There is an umbilical cord of cause and effect between the Middle East and here. Since the initial horrendous clashes at al- Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, there’s been a reported increase in Islamophobic inci­dents of 430 per cent and an increase in anti-semitic incidents of 500 per cent. This shows that what happens in Gaza, doesn’t stay in Gaza, as Jews and Muslims in the UK are being held to account for what is hap­pening thousands of miles away.

We may have an umbilical cord of love for the Middle East, pumping spiritual blood into our bodies but no one can be held re­sponsible for the actions of others over who they have no authority. It is simply wrong and unjust to see British Jews as representa­tives of Israeli government policy, or all British Muslims as supporters of Hamas.

These are racist stereotypes. Any tempta­tion to colour a whole group with the ac­tions of overseas bodies must be immedi­ately rejected. To do so only leads to more hostility and misunderstanding – here, in the UK, in our homes, on our streets, online and in person. But unfortunately, it’s hap­pening and we’re worried.

There is another way. We can avoid com­mon, but incredibly damaging, missteps which often happen when we discuss peo­ple, areas, buildings that are precious to our very core of being.

For instance, lumping together the Is­raeli government with all Israelis is wrong, just as it is wrong to hold all British citizens accountable for the UK government. Seeing all Jews as the same is wrong. Interchanging the words, ‘Israel, Israel’s government, Zi­onists and Jews’ is factually wrong as Jews around the world are not responsible for the Israeli government, do not all believe in Zionism and certainly not in what is happening in the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

Comparing Israel to the Nazis, while sometimes not done deliberately to antago­nise, is unnecessary and anti-Semitic, and only proceeds to cause distress to a Jewish population whose very existence was nearly extinguished by the Nazis within living memory. To compare a group with its oppressors is intellectually lazy, but more important, insensitive.

Similarly, assuming that outrage, dis­tress and empathy over the situation in Gaza and the Occupied Palestinian Ter­ritories means that all Muslims here hate Jews or support Hamas is also wrong, of­fensive and dangerous for the very deli­cate and increasingly fraying relation­ships between Muslims and Jews here.

Pretty much anything with the word ‘all’ or just ‘Muslims’ or ‘Jews’ won’t help. Try adding one glorious word – ‘some’. ‘Some Muslims feel x, y or z, some Jews believe x, y, or z.’ Immediately you avoid damaging generalisations.

Try turning a statement driven by emo­tion into a question. For British Muslims, this might look like asking, ‘I wonder why some Jews believe…’ Or, even better: ‘Do all Jews believe…?’ or ‘are some British Jews…?’ For British Jews, this would mean asking, ‘Why do so many Muslims care so viscerally about …’ or ‘do all British Muslims feel (or do) x, y or z?’

And finally, when you read or see some­thing that revolts or jolts or shocks, try one simple golden rule of hate avoidance. Swop the word, ‘Jew’ for ‘Muslim’ (or Hindu, or Sikh or man or woman for that matter). How would you feel if someone else said exactly the same sentence but about your own group?

Our suggestions do not mean letting oth­ers off the hook for their actions or views. It’s the opposite. Let’s hold people to ac­count for what they do and say, but ensure that it really is them who is doing the action or believing something and not what you think they have done or think.

It’s much too easy for people who hate both Muslims and Jews to be handed the gift of exploiting conflict to divide us and increase hate. A good example happened last Sunday (23) when the renowned far-right Islamaphobe Tommy Robinson at­tended a pro-Israel rally in London in an incendiary act. The rally organisers and major communal Jewish groups immedi­ately rejected his presence and so-called support. In the face of intentionally divisive figures and false allies, we must be clear that hate against one group can never ever mean solidarity with another.

Rabbi Laura’s experiences in leading the ‘People’s Peace Process’ as part of the 1993 Oslo Accords, and Imam Qari Asim’s expe­riences in interfaith here have shown the heights that can be reached in reconcilia­tion between groups on different sides of the conflict. If a former member of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Pales­tine, who spent 14 years in an Israeli prison, can call for non-violent action and peaceful progress alongside his Israeli former-ene­mies, who are we to lose hope?

Last Saturday (22) in Tel Aviv, thousands of Israeli Jews and Palestinians marched together to demand peace and call for an end to the Occupation of the West Bank. If they can work together over there, we can certainly do it here.

Together, we will be running workshops on having genuinely productive dialogue, even during times of crisis. If you are inter­ested, you can contact us on Twitter @Qari­Asim @LauraJanklaus.

More For You

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Sir Keir Starmer

Getty Images

One year on, Starmer still has no story — but plenty of regrets

Do not expect any parties in Downing Street to celebrate the government’s first birthday on Friday (4). After a rocky year, prime minister Sir Keir Starmer had more than a few regrets when giving interviews about his first year in office.

He explained that he chose the wrong chief of staff. That his opening economic narrative was too gloomy. That choosing the winter fuel allowance as a symbol of fiscal responsibility backfired. Starmer ‘deeply regretted’ the speech he gave to launch his immigration white paper, from which only the phrase ‘island of strangers’ cut through. Can any previous political leader have been quite so self-critical of their own record in real time?

Keep ReadingShow less
starmer-bangladesh-migration
Sir Keir Starmer
Getty Images

Comment: Can Starmer turn Windrush promises into policy?

Anniversaries can catalyse action. The government appointed the first Windrush Commissioner last week, shortly before Windrush Day, this year marking the 77th anniversary of the ship’s arrival in Britain.

The Windrush generation came to Britain believing what the law said – that they were British subjects, with equal rights in the mother country. But they were to discover a different reality – not just in the 1950s, but in this century too. It is five years since Wendy Williams proposed this external oversight in her review of the lessons of the Windrush scandal. The delay has damaged confidence in the compensation scheme. Williams’ proposal had been for a broader Migrants Commissioner role, since the change needed in Home Office culture went beyond the treatment of the Windrush generation itself.

Keep ReadingShow less
Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Eye Spy: Top stories from the world of entertainment

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh’s ‘Sapphire’ collaboration misses the mark

The song everyone is talking about this month is Sapphire – Ed Sheeran’s collaboration with Arijit Singh. But instead of a true duet, Arijit takes more of a backing role to the British pop superstar, which is a shame, considering he is the most followed artist on Spotify. The Indian superstar deserved a stronger presence on the otherwise catchy track. On the positive side, Sapphire may inspire more international artists to incorporate Indian elements into their music. But going forward, any major Indian names involved in global collaborations should insist on equal billing, rather than letting western stars ride on their popularity.

Ed Sheeran and Arijit Singh

Keep ReadingShow less
If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

Portraits of Iranian military generals and nuclear scientists, killed in Israel’s last Friday (13) attack, are seen above a road, as heavy smoke rises from an oil refinery in southern Teheran hit in an overnight Israeli strike last Sunday (15)

If ayatollahs fall, who will run Teheran next?

THERE is one question to which none of us has the answer: if the ayatollahs are toppled, who will take over in Teheran?

I am surprised that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Hosseini Khamenei, has lasted as long as he has. He is 86, and would achieve immortality as a “martyr” in the eyes of regime supporters if the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, succeeded in assassinating him. This was apparently Netanyahu’s plan, though he was apparently dissuaded by US president Donald Trump from going ahead with the killing.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

A woman poses with a sign as members of the public queue to enter a council meeting during a protest calling for justice for victims of sexual abuse and grooming gangs, outside the council offices at City Centre on January 20, 2025 in Oldham, England

Getty Images

Comment: Talking about race isn’t racist – ignoring it helped grooming gangs thrive

WAS a national inquiry needed into so-called grooming gangs? Prime minister Sir Keir Starmer did not think so in January, but now accepts Dame Louise Casey’s recommendation to commission one.

The previous Conservative government – having held a seven-year national inquiry into child sexual abuse – started loudly championing a new national inquiry once it lost the power to call one. Casey explains why she changed her mind too after her four-month, rapid audit into actions taken and missed on group-based exploitation and abuse. A headline Casey theme is the ‘shying away’ from race.

Keep ReadingShow less