Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘It’s time to say goodbye’

By Lord Meghnad Desai

I ARRIVED in London in September 1965 to teach at the London School of Economics (LSE).


I had left India in 1961 and gone to the United States, thanks to Ford Foundation Fellowship to do my PhD. While there, I became aware of the racial discrimination against black people. The protest movement against the Vietnam War had radical­ised me.

Coming to London, I found it to be pleasant and agreeable. Unlike many other Indians, I faced no difficulty in finding a place to rent. All my friends were cosmopolitan and interesting. I became active in supporting radical causes, especially for LSE students, as well as fighting Enoch Powell’s racist speech.

It was no surprise then that I joined the Labour party in September 1971. By then I was married and lived in Islington, north London. I became active in local politics, especially in the support for compre­hensive education and we sent all our three chil­dren to the local comprehensive school.

The Islington South and Finsbury Labour party became a fruitful area for pursuing my ideals of creating a more equal and tolerant society. I be­came chairman of the party in 1986 and led it through two elections – 1987 and 1992.

In 1991, Labour leader Neil Kinnock nominated me for the House of Lords and I became the first person of Asian origin to be a Labour member in the Lords. I gave up my chairmanship of the party in 1992 and was made a lifetime president of the Islington South and Finsbury Labour party. [I have described some of this in detail in my autobiogra­phy Rebellious Lord, published by Westland Press in India recently.]

Throughout my career in the Labour party, we fought for racial as well as gender equality. Our MP, Chris Smith, was the first openly gay parliamentar­ian. I worked closely with John Smith who was keenly interested in social justice and worked on schemes of citizens’ income.

The Labour party always had debates and quar­rels. There was a left and right division, but it was a friendly divide. I belonged to the soft left. Our idea was to move the country to a more equal, less poor, more caring society.

We lost the election in 1979 and did not regain power till 1997. It was during this period that we were infiltrated by the hard left, by the “militants” who used violent methods to pursue their aims.

It took a lot of effort by the moderate left and right to defeat the hard right. Neil Kinnock showed bold leadership,at that time.

Tony Blair won three elections and we were in power from 1997 to 2010. We had a lot of achieve­ments – peace in Northern Ireland, devolution, House of Lords reform, Supreme Court, minimum wage, more money for the NHS, and Labour had the largest number of women and people from ethnic minorities in the House of Commons.

But we lost in 2010 and again in 2015 and the party began to change. Once again, we had infiltra­tion of the hard left, but now it was not just a matter of difference about the speed of political change or even the tactics. An ugly virus of anti-Semitism had begun to infect the party. MPs who were Jewish were abused. Women MPs were trolled, threatened on social media. The party leadership failed to fight this virus – most members went unpunished and some even boasted about their hatred of Jews.

I became very uncomfortable with this develop­ment and said so in our group meeting once about three years ago. It was clear that our then leader, Jeremy Corbyn, whatever his own views, was not keen to check the anti-Semitism in the party. The Jewish board of deputies complained, but they got no redress.

We lost in 2017 and then massively in 2019. A new leader, Sir Keir Starmer, was elected by the party in early 2020 and he promised to deal with the problem. The Equality and Human Rights Com­mission issued a damning report about anti-Semi­tism in the Labour party last month.

I had high hopes that the party would be mend­ed. When Corbyn made a dismissive response to the Commission’s findings, he was suspended from Labour. I was disappointed when he was last Tues­day (17) readmitted following a unanimous deci­sion by the National Executive panel only 19 days after his suspension and without an apology.

Clearly, the party was ambivalent about eradi­cating racism. The next day the whip was temporar­ily withdrawn from Corbyn, This was a mild gesture of no consequence as he had never obeyed the whip in any case when he was a backbencher.

I decided then that the virus of anti-Semitism was not likely to be removed from the Labour party any time soon. I was ashamed of being a member of a racist party, so I decided to resign.

Many of my fellow Labour peers, who are friends, urged me not to go but stay and fight. I have to live with my conscience. The Labour party I joined 49 years ago is no longer the beacon of hope and ide­alism it used to be. It was time to say good bye.

I have heard that the Labour party is anti-Indian, but I do not credit that. My experience has been positive throughout my 49 years. When last Sep­tember the party conference passed a resolution on Kashmir criticising India’s policy, many friends asked me why was this. But the Labour party has members of Pakistani and Azad Kashmir origin, and they bring their views to the conference.

Lately, people of Indian origin – especially Hin­dus – have drifted away from Labour and joined the Conservative party. This is because British Hindus are aspirational and have an ambition to thrive and merge into British culture. They feel that the La­bour party often is condescending towards them or hostile to their economic success.

Even more generally, Conservative chancellor Rishi Sunak has received many adverse criticisms just for having been successful in his business ca­reer. This is from within his party as well. One can only hope that this will pass.

But it is with regret rather than anger that I leave the party. If Labour gets rid of its racist elements, no one will be happier about it than I. Now, however, it is good bye.

More For You

Aspirations ignited following Leicester schools Parliament visit

Aspirations ignited following Leicester schools Parliament visit

Dr Nik Kotecha OBE DL

Delighted to pause and look back on a pioneering partnership project, which saw our Randal Charitable Foundation, Leicestershire Police and the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) support pupils, from 5 Leicester schools, tour London and the Houses of Parliament with the aim to help raise aspirations and demonstrate possible future career paths.

With more young people than ever struggling to stay in education, find employment and track down career opportunities, I’ve reflected on the importance of collaborations like this one, which model just one way in that small interventions could reap rewards in the life course of youngsters.

Keep ReadingShow less
Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less