Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

UK hospitality sector warns of over half a million job cuts as furlough ends

BRITAIN'S hospitality trade is likely to see more than half a million job losses after the government's furlough scheme ends this month, as local lockdowns and reduced opening hours hurt the sector, an industry representative said on Tuesday (6).

Kate Nicholls, chief executive of UK Hospitality, told Parliament that recent restrictions meant she needed to revise up a forecast of 560,000 permanent job losses -- out of 900,000 currently furloughed workers -- that the body made last month after surveying its members.


"We anticipate that number will be far higher now as a result of the local restrictions, the national constraints on events, working from home, the curfew etc," she told the Treasury Committee, which is examining job support measures.

Britain is seeing a sharp rise in the number of coronavirus cases. Since September 24 pubs and restaurants in England have had to close by 10pm, while many parts of the UK have tighter restrictions on socialising.

The government's job retention scheme funding up to 80 per cent of wages ends this month, and from November employers will have to bring workers back part-time and shoulder a much higher share of the bill if they want staff to benefit.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak has said he only wants to support "viable" jobs from now on, and the Bank of England forecast in August that the unemployment rate would jump to 7.5 per cent by the end of the year from 4.1 per cent in the three months to July.

Nicholls said around half a million of the 3.2 million workers in the hospitality sector lost their jobs at the start of the lockdown in March, but only 5 per cent had been laid off since then, due to support from the furlough programme.

The new scheme would lead to significant renewed job losses, she warned, adding that many pubs and restaurants now risked insolvency.

"Ninety-one percent of our members said that the job support scheme... wouldn't be able to help them retain jobs because of the additional costs and restrictions that they were facing," Nicholls said.

The Confederation of British Industry told the same hearing that said Sunak may need to offer more generous job support if the number of coronavirus cases continues to rise.

"We may need to look at the way the scheme is designed over the coming weeks, particularly if the crisis escalates over the winter months, and we do think that for certain sectors... we may need to see additional support," the CBI's chief economist, Rain Newton-Smith, said.

Earlier in the day, the chancellor said his "priority right now" was saving jobs. "My overwhelming focus at the moment is trying to protect and support as many jobs as possible," Sunak said.

He added that it was sad to see city centres deserted because of the coronavirus pandemic and the government would need to look at what it could do to help return them to vibrancy afterwards.

"We will get through this pandemic, and once we emerge on the other side, we can grow strongly and get that vibrancy back into our cities and town centres... Once we get through this, we need to look at what can we do to make sure our cities remain vibrant places," he told talkRadio.

More For You

NHS cancer detection is stuck at 55 per cent. Here's why

Government targets 75 per cent early cancer detection by 2035, but Cancer Research UK says progress is falling short

Getty Images

NHS cancer detection is stuck at 55 per cent. Here's why

Highlights

  • One cancer diagnosis every 80 seconds in UK.
  • Early detection unchanged since 2013.
  • 107,000 patients wait over two months for treatment.
The NHS is not catching cancers any earlier than it did ten years ago. While 403,000 people now get a cancer diagnosis each year, the proportion caught at early stages stays around 55 per cent, barely changed from 54 per cent in 2013.

Cancer Research UK's latest report shows the detection system is not working well enough.

Michelle Mitchell, the charity's chief executive, called the findings "deeply worrying" and warned that "without urgent action, we won't see rates of improvements in cancer survival and outcomes that cancer patients deserve and expect."

Keep ReadingShow less