Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Donald Trump leaves Iran bleeding

President Trump's rhetoric offers no real protection for demonstrators.

Trump Iran protests tensions

Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

Office of the Supreme Leader of Iran via Getty Images

AMERICAN military intervention in Iran has not always been successful. For example, when president Jimmy Carter sent in “Delta Force” – the American equivalent of Britain’s elite SAS – to try and rescue the hostages taken when the US embassy in Tehran was stormed by Iranian students, the whole ven­ture ended in disaster.

The rescue mission was aborted after a US C-130 transport aircraft and a helicopter col­lided in the deserts of Iran.


I did a foolish thing at the time, which I cer­tainly wouldn’t repeat today. Keen to find out exactly what had happened, I hired a light air­craft (and a willing pilot) at Mehrabad airport in Tehran and flew out to the far away crash site with the charred debris. The Iranians brought back the bodies of the Americans so that Sade­gh Khakhali, the most erratic of the religious leaders, could convene a press conference in Tehran. He amused himself by saying one of the Americans had “two heads”. Anyway, the hos­tages were hastily dispersed across multiple lo­cations, making any future rescue attempt even more difficult.

Trump Iran protests tensions Protests continue across Iran as security forces crackdown on demonstrators.Getty Images

Despite the nationwide protests that Iran has just witnessed, the Islamic regime will not be top­pled without outside help.

US president Donald Trump warned the regime: “If Iran shots [sic] and violently kills peaceful pro­testers, which is their custom, the United States of America will come to their rescue. We are locked and loaded and ready to go.”

This was followed by: “Iranian Patriots, KEEP PROTESTING – TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!!... HELP IS ON ITS WAY.” He also said: “I have cancelled all meetings with Iranian officials until the senseless killing of protes­tors STOPS.”

The protesters were no match for the heavily armed IRGC (Islamic Re­publican Guard Corps), which was specifically created in the days of Ayatollah Khom-eini to guard the regime from the threats he had anticipated.

Khomeini’s successor as su­preme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, has confirmed “thousands” have died. Vari­ous sources put the toll at any­thing between 3,300 and 20,000. There have been images of distraught family members rummaging through body bags to try and discover the whereabouts of missing loved ones. I remem­ber spending time in the Teh­ran morgue at midnight, during the prolonged Iran-Iraq war. There was a man with yellow gloves, of the kind used for washing up in Brit­ain, piling the gladioli into buckets of water so that the flowers could be used again.

Tragically, violent death is all too familiar a way of life in Iranian morgues.

One can never be sure that Trump isn’t play­ing a double bluff, but he told reporters: “Iran cancelled the hanging of over 800 people.”

“And I greatly respect the fact that they can­celled,” he added.

Maybe Trump was willing to fight the regime down to the last Iranian, without involving the US military.

As a result, protesters feel betrayed, according to Time, which quoted a woman in Tehran: “I’ve lost all hope. Trump’s not going to do anything. Why should he? He doesn’t care about us.”

It is probable fewer people would have been killed had Trump not egged on the protesters.

The regime, which has survived, will almost certainly go ahead with the executions once it is confident Trump has decided against attack­ing Iran. It is the Islamic regime which is “locked and loaded”.

The regime will do everything it can to sur­vive – and without military intervention from Trump, it might even have been strengthened.

But eliminating Khamenei, which must be one of the American options, will ensure he is made a martyr. As with Venezuela, Trump would basically have to “run” Iran.

More For You

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar speaks to media infront of the party’s Ad Van Campaign on May 04, 2026 in Bathgate, Scotland

Getty Images

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Sunder Katwala

The tremors of the May 2026 elections could shift the tectonic plates of British politics. Attention will quickly turn to the Westminster aftershocks, including what the fallout of these national elections in Scotland and Wales alongside local elections across much of England, mean for Sir Keir Starmer’s future. Yet these seismic electoral upheavals merit scrutiny in their own right.

Wales is set for a once a century political earthquake. Labour has not just led the Welsh government since devolution began in 1999 - but won the most votes in every national election in Wales since 1922. Yet it now trails third, burdened by double incumbency in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, with the party watching the Welsh nationalists of Plaid Cymru and Reform’s pro-Brexit populists compete to top the polls. That contrast has polarised Wales - by age and geography - though a broad majority would prefer a government led by Plaid Cymru’s Rhun Ap Iowerth, with two-thirds hoping to keep Reform out.

Scotland could offer a rare pocket of political stability. John Swinney is the third Scottish first minister of a turbulent term after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, but may now secure a fifth term for his Scottish National Party. The trick to bucking the anti-incumbent trend has been to leverage his Edinburgh government being comparatively less unpopular than its London counterpart. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar sought to demonstrate his own distance from Westminster by calling for Starmer to resign, but his bid to lead Scotland, and become its second Asian First Minister, looks set to fall short.

Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap IorwerthGetty Images

Keep ReadingShow less