Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Targeting Bashir

By Amit Roy

THIS is not being written in defence of Martin Ba­shir, 57, the BBC’s reli­gion correspondent, who secured “that interview” with Diana, Princess of Wales, in 1995.


It is alleged that he used forged bank statements to convince Diana, through her brother Charles, the ninth Earl Spencer, that her staff were being paid by the intelligence servic­es to spy on her.

Charles, who is leading the charge against Bashir, has himself been accused of “hypocrisy” because he allegedly refused to pro­vide shelter to Diana in 1996 when his distressed sister sought his help.

It is worth recalling that three years before Diana gave her interview to Bashir, she collaborat­ed with author Andrew Morton and sensationally revealed all was not well with her marriage in his book, Diana: Her True Story. No one has accused Morton or indeed Charles Spencer of somehow be­ing responsible for Diana’s mental decline, as Bashir has been. His big crime was probably to beat Fleet Street royal hacks to a scoop.

This is not an attempt to defend Bashir. But it’s worth asking a question: would he attract quite as much hatred if he wasn’t of Pakistani origin?

My own feeling is that Diana should now be al­lowed to rest in peace.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Why Burnham's ambitious plan for change remains a work in progress

Andy Burnham's elevation to power has been a marathon and a sprint.

Getty Images

Why Burnham's ambitious plan for change remains a work in progress

Sunder Katwala

Andy Burnham left Buckingham Palace on Monday (20) acutely aware of the gap between the scale of his ambition - to deliver the biggest changes for forty years - and the Downing Street revolving door that makes him already the sixth new prime minister in a decade.

Only two summers before, Sir Keir Starmer, in possession of an election landslide, had spoken of a decade of national renewal. Now he had to declare his work in government ‘done’ – insisting in his pride in the incremental progress made, though bruised by his party’s impatient lack of faith in him to finish the job. He ended with a final warning about the dangers of the forces of division for British society, which he had struggled to quell.

Keep ReadingShow less