Gayathri Kallukaran is a Junior Journalist with Eastern Eye. She has a Master’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from St. Paul’s College, Bengaluru, and brings over five years of experience in content creation, including two years in digital journalism. She covers stories across culture, lifestyle, travel, health, and technology, with a creative yet fact-driven approach to reporting. Known for her sensitivity towards human interest narratives, Gayathri’s storytelling often aims to inform, inspire, and empower. Her journey began as a layout designer and reporter for her college’s daily newsletter, where she also contributed short films and editorial features. Since then, she has worked with platforms like FWD Media, Pepper Content, and Petrons.com, where several of her interviews and features have gained spotlight recognition. Fluent in English, Malayalam, Tamil, and Hindi, she writes in English and Malayalam, continuing to explore inclusive, people-focused storytelling in the digital space.
A Chinese scientist working at a top US university has been arrested over allegations of smuggling a dangerous crop-destroying fungus into the United States. The pathogen, classified as a potential agroterrorism weapon, poses risks not only to crops but also to human and animal health.
Scientist pair accused of conspiracy
Yunqing Jian, 33, a researcher at the University of Michigan, was arrested and charged with conspiracy, smuggling, visa fraud and making false statements. Her partner, Zunyong Liu, 34, who previously worked at a university in China, is also accused in the case. US authorities allege that the pair conspired to bring Fusarium graminearum—a fungus responsible for billions in global agricultural losses—into the country.
The fungus causes a plant disease known as "head blight", particularly in wheat, rice and barley. It not only devastates harvests but can also lead to vomiting, liver damage and reproductive problems in both humans and livestock if ingested.
Fungus labelled as an ‘agroterrorism weapon’
According to the FBI, Fusarium graminearum is recognised in scientific circles as a potential agroterrorism threat due to its severe economic impact and its ability to contaminate food supplies. The US attorney’s office for the Eastern District of Michigan confirmed that the University of Michigan does not hold federal permits to handle this pathogen.
'Fusarium graminearum' is recognised in scientific circles as a potential agroterrorism threat Telegraph
“It is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year,” the statement added.
Smuggling attempt at Detroit airport
Authorities claim that Liu attempted to smuggle samples of the fungus through Detroit airport in July 2024. During an inspection, red-coloured plant material was discovered in his backpack. He was immediately returned to China, which does not have an extradition treaty with the US, making it unlikely that he will face charges unless he voluntarily returns.
Despite this, investigators say Jian was already working with the fungus at the University of Michigan before Liu’s interception. FBI director Kash Patel alleged via a post on X that Jian had previously received Chinese government funding for similar research in China.
Evidence of Communist Party loyalty
A search of Jian’s mobile phone revealed a document pledging her allegiance to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The declaration stated: “I adhere to the four basic principles, support the leadership of the Communist Party of China, resolutely implement the party’s educational guidelines and policies, love education, care for students, unite colleagues, love the motherland, and care about national affairs.”
The "four principles" referenced in the document include upholding socialism, the leadership of the CCP, Marxism-Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought (Maoism), and the people’s democratic dictatorship.
US Attorney Jerome Gorgon Jr described the case as “of the gravest national security concerns,” citing fears that the CCP is using academics to infiltrate sensitive American institutions.
Suspicious research and communications
Investigators found messages between Jian and Liu indicating that they were both working on Fusarium graminearum in 2024. Liu's phone also contained an academic article titled "Plant-Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions", which raised further suspicions.
Liu's phone also contained an academic article titled "Plant-Pathogen Warfare under Changing Climate Conditions"Telegraph
In court, Jian appeared handcuffed and visibly distressed. Her bond hearing is scheduled for Thursday. Journalists were barred from attending the session, but reports say she appeared shocked as the charges were read aloud.
University and White House respond
The University of Michigan issued a statement saying it had no involvement in the research and denied receiving any funding from the Chinese government related to the accused individuals.
“We strongly condemn any actions that seek to cause harm, threaten national security or undermine the university’s critical public mission,” the university said.
The case has surfaced at a sensitive time in US-China relations, with President Donald Trump expected to speak with Chinese President Xi Jinping later this week. Trade tensions remain high, particularly over agricultural tariffs, and US officials have expressed concern over China’s purchase of around 380,000 acres of American farmland, some near military installations.
Geopolitical backdrop
The arrest also comes amid a fragile pause in the ongoing US-China trade war. After Trump’s “liberation day” announcement on 2 April, tariffs on Chinese imports peaked at 145 per cent. China retaliated by placing levies on roughly £16 billion worth of US goods, particularly agricultural products, causing American grain prices to plummet.
The FBI has framed the fungus smuggling case as part of a broader pattern of Chinese interference in US domestic affairs, including attempts to undermine the nation’s food security.
“This case is a sobering reminder that the CCP is working around the clock to deploy operatives and researchers to infiltrate American institutions and target our food supply,” said Patel.
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s decision to sharply increase H-1B visa application costs is expected to accelerate American companies’ move to shift more high-value work to India. Economists and industry experts say this will further boost the growth of global capability centres (GCCs), which manage operations ranging from finance to research and development.
India hosts about 1,700 GCCs, more than half of the global total. These centres, which began with a focus on tech support, have expanded into innovation-driven work, including car dashboard design and drug discovery.
Analysts say growing use of artificial intelligence and tightening visa rules are leading US companies to reassess labour strategies, with India-based GCCs emerging as key hubs combining global expertise with local leadership.
“GCCs are uniquely positioned for this moment. They serve as a ready in-house engine,” said Rohan Lobo, partner and GCC industry leader at Deloitte India. He said he was aware of several US firms currently reassessing workforce plans. “Plans are already underway,” he added, citing increased activity in financial services and technology, especially among firms connected to US federal contracts.
Lobo said he expected GCCs to “take on more strategic, innovation-led mandates” going forward.
Earlier this month, Trump raised the cost of new H-1B visa applications to $100,000, up from the earlier range of $2,000 to $5,000. The increase adds pressure on US companies that rely on skilled foreign workers to fill critical roles.
On Monday, US senators reintroduced a bill seeking tighter rules on H-1B and L-1 visa programmes, aimed at closing what they described as loopholes and misuse by major employers.
Industry experts say that if visa restrictions remain in place, US firms are likely to shift advanced work in artificial intelligence, product development, cybersecurity and analytics to their GCCs in India, while retaining more strategic functions in-house rather than outsourcing.
Lalit Ahuja, founder and CEO of ANSR, which has helped companies such as FedEx, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Target and Lowe’s set up GCCs, said, “There is a sense of urgency.”
Reassessing India strategies
Ramkumar Ramamoorthy, former managing director of Cognizant India, said the trend could even lead to “extreme offshoring” in some cases. He pointed out that the Covid-19 pandemic had already shown that critical technology work could be done remotely.
US government data shows that Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, Alphabet (Google’s parent), JPMorgan Chase and Walmart were among the biggest sponsors of H-1B visas. All of them have significant operations in India but declined to comment, given the political sensitivity of the issue.
“Either more roles will move to India, or corporations will near-shore them to Mexico or Colombia. Canada could also take advantage,” said the India head of a retail GCC.
Even before the latest visa fee hike and plans for a new selection process favouring higher-paid roles, India was projected to host the GCCs of more than 2,200 companies by 2030, with the market size nearing $100 billion. “This whole ‘gold rush’ will only get accelerated,” Ahuja said.
Implications for India
Some remain cautious, noting the risks of new legislation. If the proposed HIRE Act is passed, US companies could face a 25 per cent tax on outsourcing work overseas, a move that could disrupt India’s services exports.
“For now, we are observing and studying, and being ready for outcomes,” said the India head of a US drugmaker’s GCC.
Trade tensions between the two countries have extended into services, with visa curbs and the HIRE Act proposal threatening India’s cost advantage and cross-border service flows.
India’s $283 billion IT industry, which contributes nearly 8 per cent of GDP, may come under pressure. However, rising demand for GCC services could offset part of the impact.
“Lost revenues from H-1B visa reliant businesses could be somewhat supplanted by higher services exports through GCCs, as US-based firms look to bypass immigration restrictions to outsource talent,” Nomura analysts said in a research note last week.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The meeting lasted for about one hour and 20 minutes. (Photo: X/@DerekJGrossman)
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump met Pakistan prime minister Shehbaz Sharif and Field Marshal Asim Munir at the White House to discuss bilateral ties.
Speaking to reporters after signing executive orders on Thursday, Trump said, “In fact, we have a great leader coming, the prime minister of Pakistan coming, and the field marshal (of) Pakistan. Field marshal is a very great guy and so is the prime minister, both. And they're coming.”
This was the first formal bilateral meeting between Trump and Sharif. The last Pakistani leader to meet Trump was Imran Khan in July 2019 during Trump’s first term.
Sharif is in the US for the 80th session of the United Nations General Assembly and will address the General Debate on Friday.
The Oval Office meeting in Washington DC was also attended by vice president JD Vance and secretary of state Marco Rubio, according to a statement from the Pakistan Prime Minister's Office (PMO). The PMO said the meeting was held in a “pleasant atmosphere”.
The meeting, closed to the press, was scheduled to begin at 4:30 pm (local time) but started about 30 minutes later due to Trump’s engagements. It lasted for about one hour and 20 minutes. Photos released later showed Sharif and Munir speaking with Trump, who posed with his thumbs up during a group photo.
Sharif and Trump had earlier met in New York on Tuesday at a multilateral meeting the US president held with leaders from Arab nations and others, including Egypt, Indonesia, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkiye.
Radio Pakistan had reported that the White House talks were expected to cover matters of mutual interest as well as regional and global developments. Sharif arrived at the White House at 4.52 pm and was received by senior US officials. His motorcade left at 6.18 pm, according to the White House pool.
After signing the executive orders, Trump told reporters he had “stopped seven wars”. He repeated the same at the UNGA. Pakistan has nominated Trump for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, citing “decisive diplomatic intervention and pivotal leadership during the recent India-Pakistan crisis”.
On May 10, Trump announced that India and Pakistan had agreed to a “full and immediate” ceasefire after a “long night” of talks mediated by Washington. Since then, he has repeated nearly 50 times that he “helped settle” tensions between the two countries.
India, however, has maintained that the agreement to cease hostilities was reached through direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations of the two sides.
The last Pakistani prime minister to visit the White House was Imran Khan in 2019. Before that, Nawaz Sharif visited in 2015.
Pakistan and the US were Cold War allies and worked together in Afghanistan against the USSR and later militancy. Their ties weakened over differences on the Afghan Taliban. The relationship reached a low when the US killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan in 2011.
The two countries have now signed a trade agreement under which Pakistani imports will face a 19 per cent tariff. The US will also assist in developing Pakistan’s oil reserves.
According to official figures, US goods and services trade with Pakistan was USD 10.1 billion in 2024, up 6.3 per cent (USD 523.0 million) from 2023. The total goods trade was USD 7.2 billion.
US goods exports to Pakistan in 2024 were USD 2.1 billion, up 3.3 per cent (USD 67.2 million) from 2023. Imports from Pakistan were USD 5.1 billion, up 4.8 per cent (USD 233.9 million). The US goods trade deficit with Pakistan was USD 3 billion in 2024, a 5.9 per cent increase (USD 166.7 million) from 2023.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Hanuman statue in Sugar Land has become a symbol of the growing Hindu American community in Texas
A US politician has caused controversy after calling the Hindu god Hanuman "false" and declaring America a "Christian nation", leading to widespread criticism from Hindu groups and social media users.
Texas Republican Senate candidate Alexander Duncan posted on social media last week alongside a video of a 90-foot bronze statue of Hanuman: "Why are we allowing a false statue of a false Hindu god to be here in Texas? We are a CHRISTIAN nation!"
The statue, known as the Statue of Union, stands at the Sri Ashtalakshmi Temple in Sugar Land, Texas. Unveiled in 2024, it is North America's tallest Hanuman statue and the third-tallest statue in the US. The monument was created following a vision by Sri Chinnajeeyar Swamiji.
Duncan also quoted from the Bible in another post, writing: "You must not have any other god but me. You must not make for yourself an idol of any kind or an image of anything in the heavens or on the earth or in the sea. Exodus 20:3-4."
His comments sparked immediate backlash from Hindu American groups and internet users, who accused him of religious intolerance and anti-Hindu sentiment.
The Hindu American Foundation (HAF) strongly condemned Duncan's remarks, calling them "anti-Hindu hate" and demanding action from the Republican Party of Texas. The organisation posted on social media: "Will you be disciplining your senate candidate from your party who openly goes against your own guidelines against discrimination - displaying some pretty awful anti-Hindu hate - not to mention disrespect for the 1st Amendment's Establishment Clause?"
The First Amendment to the US Constitution protects religious freedom and prevents the government from establishing an official religion.
Social media users also criticised Duncan's comments. One user wrote: "Just because you're not Hindu, doesn't make it false. The Vedas were written almost 2,000 years before Jesus walked the earth and are extraordinary texts. There are obvious influences on Christianity... so it would be wise to honour and research the religion that comes before and influences yours."
Another user pointed out that a statue does not count as "forcing religion" on anyone, adding: "We may be a Christian majority nation but, if you try to claim that other beliefs are not allowed here, then you are supporting a theocracy which goes against American values."
The controversy highlights ongoing tensions in American politics over religious diversity and the role of faith in public life. The United States has a significant Hindu population, with many temples and religious monuments across the country.
Hindu Americans have increasingly become targets of religious discrimination and hate crimes in recent years, according to community groups. The HAF and other organisations have worked to raise awareness about anti-Hindu sentiment and protect the rights of Hindu Americans.
The Republican Party of Texas has not yet commented on Duncan's remarks or announced any disciplinary action against the Senate candidate. Duncan is seeking to represent Texas in the US Senate as part of the Republican Party led by President Donald Trump.
The Hanuman statue in Sugar Land has become a symbol of the growing Hindu American community in Texas. The deity Hanuman is revered in Hinduism as a symbol of strength, courage, and devotion.
This incident adds to ongoing debates about religious freedom and tolerance in American society, particularly as the country becomes increasingly diverse in its religious makeup.
(with inputs from PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Donald Trump displays a signed executive order on gold card visa in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., September 19, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has signed a proclamation raising the annual fee for H-1B visas to $100,000 (more than £74,000), a move widely criticised by lawmakers and community leaders as “reckless” and “unfortunate.”
The proclamation, titled Restriction on entry of certain non-immigrant workers, will come into effect from 12.01 am on September 21. Immigration lawyers have advised H-1B holders or their dependants currently abroad to return to the US immediately or risk being stranded.
Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi called the fee hike a “reckless attempt to cut America off from high-skilled workers who have long strengthened our workforce, fuelled innovation, and built industries that employ millions.”
Ajay Bhutoria, a former adviser to president Joe Biden, warned that the decision could undermine the US technology sector. “This massive jump from the current $2,000–5,000 fee will crush small businesses and start-ups reliant on diverse talent,” he said.
Currently, H-1B visas cost between $2,000 and $5,000 depending on employer size and are valid for three years, extendable for another three. The new fee will particularly affect Indian tech workers, who make up a large share of visa holders.
According to US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Amazon had the highest number of H-1B approvals in 2025 with 10,044, followed by Tata Consultancy Services (5,505), Microsoft (5,189), Meta (5,123), Apple (4,202), Google (4,181), Deloitte (2,353), Infosys (2,004), Wipro (1,523) and Tech Mahindra Americas (951).
In his proclamation, Trump argued that the visa programme was being exploited to replace American workers with cheaper labour. “The abuse of the H-1B programme is a national security threat,” he said, citing investigations into fraud and money laundering by outsourcing companies.
The new order requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to reject petitions not accompanied by the $100,000 fee for H-1B speciality occupation workers outside the US, for at least 12 months. Limited exemptions will apply if hiring is deemed in the national interest.
Commerce secretary Howard Lutnick said the policy aims to “bring in only extraordinary people” while raising more than $100 billion (£74bn) for the US Treasury. He added that companies must now decide whether a foreign worker is “valuable enough” to justify the new cost.
The move comes as Indians on H-1B visas already face long waits for Green Cards, raising concerns that many may be forced to leave the US if employers refuse to pay.
Critics warn the decision will drive away skilled professionals who power Silicon Valley and contribute billions to the US economy. Krishnamoorthi noted that many H-1B holders eventually become citizens and entrepreneurs who create American jobs.
The Foundation for India and Indian Diaspora Studies called the policy “very unfortunate,” warning of severe consequences for the technology industry.
New York immigration attorney Cyrus Mehta said H-1B visa holders outside the US may already be stranded, as most cannot reach America before the deadline. Internal emails from Microsoft advised employees on H-1B visas not to travel abroad.
Trump also announced a new Gold Card scheme, offering a fast-track visa and Green Card pathway to individuals who contribute $1 million (£738,222) to the US Treasury, or $2m (£1.48m) if sponsored by a company.
A 30-year-old man from Telangana, who died after being shot by police in the US during an altercation, had earlier claimed he was a victim of “racial hatred and discrimination.”
Mohammed Nizamuddin, from Mahabubnagar district, was shot by Santa Clara Police officers on September 3 after they found him stabbing a roommate.
Before the incident, Nizamuddin wrote on social media that he faced “racial hatred, discrimination, harassment, torture, wage fraud, wrongful termination and obstruction of justice.”
He added: “Today I decided to raise my voice against all odds… Oppression of corporate tyrants must end, and everyone involved must be punished severely.”
He also alleged that his employers created a hostile environment, withheld wages, and fired him unfairly. According to his posts, the harassment continued with the support of a “racist detective.” He further claimed his food was poisoned and that he was being evicted for resisting injustice.
His father, Mohammed Hasnuddin, said in Hyderabad that details of what happened remain unclear. He added that Nizamuddin had been working as a software professional in the US after completing his MS there.
Police said they received a 911 call at 6:18 am about a stabbing in Santa Clara. When officers arrived, they found Nizamuddin attacking a victim with a knife. Despite verbal commands to stop, he continued the assault. An officer then shot him four times.
Nizamuddin was taken to hospital, where he was declared dead. The victim, who suffered multiple stab wounds, was treated and later released.
Santa Clara Police chief Cory Morgan said the officer’s actions “clearly saved at least one life and possibly others.” He added that body-worn camera footage showed Nizamuddin pinning the victim to the ground and raising a knife to strike.
The officer involved, Robert Allsup, has 12 years of service and is trained in crisis intervention. His body camera was on throughout the incident.
“Any loss of life is tragic,” Morgan said. “But the officer’s split-second decision ensured nobody else was killed or seriously injured.”
The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office and police are jointly investigating the case.
The Indian Consulate in San Francisco expressed sorrow over Nizamuddin’s death and said it is in touch with his family and local authorities. His father has appealed to the Indian government for help in bringing his son’s body back home.
Meanwhile, Majlis Bachao Tahreek (MBT) spokesperson Amjed Ullah Khan urged India's external affairs minister S Jaishankar to support the family.