Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
A BRITISH ASIAN minister is under mounting pressure to resign after claims she evicted tenants from her property and then hiked up the rent by nearly £700 a month.
Politicians from across the political spectrum are calling for homelessness minister, Rushanara Ali, to quit her job, accusing her of "staggering hypocrisy" after the allegations emerged.
Four tenants who rented Ali's four-bedroom house in east London were given four months' notice last November and told their lease would not be renewed because the property was going to be sold, according to the i Paper.
The tenants, who had been paying £3,300 a month, left the property as requested. However, they claim the house was then relisted for rent at nearly £4,000 a month after no buyer was found.
The property, located near Ali's Bethnal Green and Stepney constituency, was put up for sale at £914,995 in November but the price was later reduced in February.
The report has sparked outrage across party lines, with politicians branding Ali a hypocrite given her public stance on protecting tenants' rights.
Kevin Hollinrake, the Conservative party chairman, said: "I think it shows staggering hypocrisy. Rushanara Ali has been somebody who's obviously a government minister in charge of homelessness. She's spoken out about exploiting tenants, about providing more protections to tenants."
He added: "You can't say those things, then do the opposite in practice, as a landlord. She's got to resign."
The shadow housing secretary, James Cleverly, said the allegations "would be an example of the most extreme hypocrisy and she should not have the job as homelessness minister".
Peter Wishart, the SNP's deputy leader at Westminster, said: "Once this shameful story broke, Labour's homelessness minister should have immediately resigned. The fact that she still hasn't means this is now a direct test of Keir Starmer – he needs to sack her immediately."
Even members of Ali's own party have criticised her. Jess Barnard, a former chair of Young Labour and a member of Labour's National Executive Committee, said: "Seems an appropriate time to reiterate MPs should not be landlords, and landlords should not be Labour MPs."
Martin Abrams, a Labour councillor in Lambeth, posted: "You couldn't make this up! Rushanara Ali should resign #LandlordsOutOfLabour."
Ali's spokesperson said: "Rushanara takes her responsibilities seriously and complied with all relevant legal requirements."
A source close to the minister told the BBC that the tenancy had a fixed-term contract and that the house had been put on the market while the tenants were still there. They said the tenants had been told they could stay on a rolling basis while the house was on the market, but they had chosen to leave. The house was only relisted for rental because it had not sold.
When asked about Ali's actions, home secretary Yvette Cooper said she was not familiar with the specifics of the case but believed the minister had acted within the law.
The controversy is particularly damaging given Ali's public statements about tenant protection. She has spoken out against private renters being exploited and said the Labour government would "empower people to challenge unreasonable rent increases".
Ben Twomey, chief executive of campaign group Generation Rent, said: "These allegations are shocking and a wake-up call to government on the need to push ahead as quickly as possible to improve protections for renters."
Meanwhile, the government's Renters' Rights Bill, due to come into force next year, will ban landlords who have ended a tenancy to sell a property from relisting it for six months.
Donald Trump speaks with the press as he meets with Narendra Modi in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on February 13, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
INDIAN exporters on Thursday warned that additional US tariffs could render many businesses "not viable" after president Donald Trump ordered a steep hike in levies on Indian goods over New Delhi’s purchase of Russian oil.
Stocks opened slightly lower, with the benchmark Nifty index falling 0.31 per cent after the initial 25 per cent US tariff came into effect. The levy is set to double to 50 per cent from August 28, following Trump’s order on Wednesday penalising India’s continued imports of Russian oil.
India is the second-largest buyer of Russian crude, benefiting from discounts amid Western sanctions. The US move is aimed at cutting Moscow’s oil revenue, which is used to fund the war in Ukraine.
India’s foreign ministry called the new US tariffs “unfair, unjustified and unreasonable.”
Exporters fear impact
SC Ralhan, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), said the decision would significantly affect trade.
"This move is a severe setback for Indian exports, with nearly 55 per cent of our shipments to the US market directly affected," he said in a statement.
"The 50 per cent reciprocal tariff effectively imposes a cost burden, placing our exporters at a 30–35 per cent competitive disadvantage compared to peers from countries with lesser reciprocal tariff."
Ralhan added that "many export orders have already been put on hold" as buyers reconsider sourcing.
For many small to medium-sized businesses, margins are already thin, he said. "Absorbing this sudden cost escalation is simply not viable."
Tariff could hit growth
The US is India’s largest trading partner, with exports to the country amounting to $87.4 billion in 2024.
"If the extra 25 per cent tariff that president Trump has announced on imports from India remains in place, India’s attractiveness as an emerging manufacturing hub will be hugely undermined," said Shilan Shah of Capital Economics.
Shah said US spending supports around 2.5 per cent of India’s GDP. He added that a 50 per cent tariff is "large enough to have a material impact", potentially reducing economic growth to closer to six per cent this year and next, down from the current forecast of seven per cent.
Modi says farmers’ interests come first
prime minister Narendra Modi, responding publicly for the first time, said India would not compromise the interests of its farmers.
"For us, our farmers' welfare is supreme," Modi said at an event in New Delhi. "India will never compromise on the wellbeing of its farmers, dairy (sector) and fishermen. And I know personally I will have to pay a heavy price for it."
While Modi did not directly name the US or mention the stalled trade talks, his comments were seen as a defence of India's position.
Trade negotiations between the two countries broke down after five rounds, mainly over India’s reluctance to open up its farm and dairy sectors and its continued purchase of Russian oil.
The Indian foreign ministry described the US move as “extremely unfortunate” and said it would “take all necessary steps to protect its national interests.”
India calls US move illogical
Dammu Ravi, secretary of economic relations in India’s foreign ministry, said the US decision lacked justification.
"The US tariff hike lacks logic," Ravi told reporters.
"This is a temporary aberration, a temporary problem that the country will face, but in course of time, we are confident that the world will find solutions."
New diplomatic efforts
India is already signalling a possible shift in diplomatic strategy. Modi is planning his first visit to China in over seven years, which may indicate a reassessment of global alignments.
Brazilian president Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said on Wednesday that he would initiate a BRICS-level discussion on how to address the tariffs. He said he planned to call both Modi and China’s Xi Jinping. The BRICS group also includes Russia and South Africa.
India’s Ravi added that "like-minded countries will look for cooperation and economic engagement that will be mutually beneficial to all sides."
Political and industry response
Modi is facing growing calls to respond firmly to the US decision, with both his supporters and opposition leaders urging a strong reaction.
"India's national interest is supreme. Any nation that arbitrarily penalises India for its time-tested policy of strategic autonomy, rooted in the ideology of non-alignment, does not understand the steel frame India is made of," said Congress party president Mallikarjun Kharge.
Industry groups also voiced concern. Sudhir Sekhri, chairman of the Apparel Export Promotion Council, said: "There is no way the industry can absorb such a steep hike." He called for fiscal support from the government.
Reliance Industries, led by Mukesh Ambani, said in its annual report that ongoing geopolitical and tariff-related uncertainties could affect trade flows and the demand-supply balance.
India's equity market fell another 0.5 per cent on Thursday, hitting a three-month low. The muted reaction reflected investor expectations that the tariffs could still be negotiated down.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Commuters cross London Bridge on October 15, 2024. (Photo: Getty Images)
UK's main minimum wage rate is expected to rise by 4.1 per cent next year to £12.71 an hour to stay aligned with the government's goal of matching two-thirds of median earnings, the Low Pay Commission said on Tuesday.
The minimum wage in Britain has seen sharp increases in recent years. It rose by 6.7 per cent in April to £12.21 an hour. OECD data showed it was the second-highest in Europe in relative terms last year, behind France.
The Bank of England considers rising wage costs across the economy as one of the reasons for the UK's higher inflation compared to other European countries. However, it expects this pressure to ease as the labour market slows.
The government sets the minimum wage each year based on recommendations from the Low Pay Commission, which includes members representing employers, trade unions and academia.
Around 6.5 per cent of UK workers earn the minimum wage, and many others earn slightly more.
A hospitality trade body said increased employment costs had already led to reduced staff hours.
"Any significant wage hike may cost jobs. We urge the Low Pay Commission to recognise these cost pressures and recommend a more gradual and sustainable increase this year," said UKHospitality chair Kate Nicholls.
Earlier on Tuesday, the government issued guidance to the commission outlining the factors it should consider. These remain largely unchanged from 2024 and include keeping the minimum wage at no less than two-thirds of the median while considering employment and economic competitiveness.
In May, the commission had forecast a 3.6 per cent rise in the minimum wage for employees aged 21 and over, which is known as the National Living Wage.
The commission said Tuesday’s higher estimate reflected stronger average wage growth over the past three months and expectations for higher growth in the coming year. The final rate could fall between £12.55 and £12.86 an hour.
"Our recommendations are not purely formulaic and we are required to take economic conditions into account, so these figures should be taken as indicative only," it said.
The estimate is based on a forecast that annual average wage growth will slow from 5.1 per cent in May 2025 to 3.9 per cent by the end of the year, and to 3 per cent by the end of 2026.
The government has also asked the commission to continue working towards removing the lower minimum wage of £10 an hour for 18- to 20-year-olds, without affecting employment in that age group.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
FILE PHOTO: India's prime minister Narendra Modi meets Chinese president Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the BRICS Summit, in Kazan. (ANI Photo)
INDIAN prime minister Narendra Modi will visit China for the first time in over seven years, a government source said on Wednesday (6), in a further sign of a diplomatic thaw with Beijing as tensions with the US rise.
Modi will go to China for a summit of the multilateral Shanghai Cooperation Organisation that begins on August 31, the government source, with direct knowledge of the matter, told Reuters. India's foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
His trip will come at a time when India's relationship with the US faces its most serious crisis in years after president Donald Trump imposed the highest tariffs among Asian peers on goods imported from India, and has threatened an unspecified further penalty for New Delhi's purchases of Russian oil.
Modi's visit to the Chinese city of Tianjin for the summit of the SCO, a Eurasian political and security grouping that includes Russia, will be his first since June 2018. Subsequently, Sino-Indian ties deteriorated sharply after a military clash along their disputed Himalayan border in 2020.
Modi and Chinese president Xi Jinping held talks on the sidelines of a BRICS summit in Russia in October that led to a thaw. The giant Asian neighbours are now slowly defusing tensions that have hampered business relations and travel between the two countries.
Modi with Xi Jinping. (ANI Photo)
Trump has threatened to charge an additional 10 per cent tariff on imports from members - which include India - of the BRICS group of major emerging economies for "aligning themselves with Anti-American policies."
Trump said on Wednesday his administration would decide on the penalty for buying Russian oil after the outcome of US efforts to seek a last-minute breakthrough that would bring about a ceasefire in the war in Ukraine.
Trump's top diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff is in Moscow, two days before the expiry of a deadline the president set for Russia to agree to peace in Ukraine or face new sanctions.
Meanwhile, India's National Security Adviser Ajit Doval is in Russia on a scheduled visit and is expected to discuss India's purchases of Russian oil in the wake of Trump's pressure on India to stop buying Russian crude, according to another government source, who also did not want to be named.
Doval is likely to address India's defence cooperation with Russia, including obtaining faster access to pending exports to India of Moscow's S400 air defence system, and a possible visit by president Vladimir Putin to India.
Doval's trip will be followed by foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar in the weeks to come.
US and Indian officials said a mix of political misjudgement, missed signals and bitterness scuttled trade deal negotiations between the world's biggest and fifth-largest economies, whose bilateral trade is worth over $190 billion (£149bn).
India expects Trump's crackdown could cost it a competitive advantage in about $64 billion worth of goods sent to the US that account for 80 per cent of its total exports,four separate sources told Reuters, citing an internal government assessment.
However, the relatively low share of exports in India's $4 trillion economy is expectedto limit the direct impact on economic growth.
On Wednesday, the Reserve Bank of India left its GDP growth forecast for the current April-March financial year unchanged at 6.5 per cent and held rates steady despite the tariff uncertainties.
India's government assessment report has assumed a 10 per cent penalty for buying Russian oil, which would take the total US tariff to 35 per cent, the sources said.
India's trade ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The internal assessment report is the government's initial estimate and will change as the quantum of tariffs imposed by Trump becomes clear, all four sources said.
India exported goods estimated at around $81bn (£64bn) in 2024 to the US.
(Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
A view of the massive mudslide that struck Dharali village in the Kheer Gad area near Harsil following a cloud burst, in Uttarkashi. (@UttarkashiPol X/ANI Photo)
AT LEAST four people were killed and more than 50 were missing after flood waters swept through a village in India's Himalayan state of Uttarakhand on Tuesday (5).
A road tunnel under construction in Uttarakhand caved in, trapping 41 people inside. The men - low-wage workers from some of India's poorest states - were rescued 17 days later.
Authorities did not give a reason for the structure's collapse.
October 2023
A glacial lake outburst triggered by torrential rain led to devastating floods in India's northeastern state of Sikkim, leaving at least 179 people dead.
January 2023
Nearly 200 people were evacuated from their homes in the Himalayan town of Joshimath after hundreds of buildings in the area developed cracks. The unsafe structures were later demolished.
Geologists, residents, and officials blamed rapid construction in the mountains, which they said had weakened the buildings and the land beneath them.
A view of the massive mudslide that struck Dharali following a cloudburst, in Uttarkashi on Wednesday. (ITBP/ANI Video Grab)
October 2021
Unseasonal heavy rain flooded roads and washed away bridges in Uttarakhand, killing at least 46 people.
February 2021
More than 200 people were killed as a flash flood in Uttarakhand swept away two hydroelectric projects and sent water, rocks, and debris surging down the Dhauliganga river valley.
Scientists said the deluge could have been triggered by a large avalanche of glacier ice.
September 2014
The Himalayan region of Kashmir saw its worst flooding in 50 years as the Jhelum river, which flows from India to Pakistan, surged due to unusually heavy rain.
About 200 Indians and 264 Pakistanis were killed in the incident.
June 2013
A total of 580 people were killed in northern India and nearly 6,000 went missing as flash floods and landslides unleashed by early monsoon rains swallowed houses, apartment blocks, and vehicles.
(Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
Lidl's average basket cost: £128 with loyalty card, £128.40 without
Lidl replaces Aldi as UK’s cheapest supermarket in Which? analysis
Lidl's average basket cost: £128 with loyalty card, £128.40 without
Aldi’s average basket: £129.25
Waitrose ranked most expensive at £170.91
Asda offers best value for larger branded shop
Shopping at different supermarkets could save households up to 25%
For the first time in nearly two years, Aldi has lost its crown as the UK’s cheapest supermarket, with Lidl narrowly taking the top spot, according to a price comparison by consumer group Which?.
In its monthly analysis, Which? compared the cost of a typical basket of 76 grocery items, including own-label and branded products. Lidl’s basket came in at £128 with a loyalty card and £128.40 without. Aldi’s equivalent basket was priced at £129.25.
How other supermarkets compared
Both Aldi and Lidl were significantly cheaper than their traditional rivals. Tesco’s basket came to around £17 more, while Waitrose was the most expensive, with an average total of £170.91.
Tesco, Sainsbury’s and Morrisons all offered varying levels of savings through loyalty cards. However, Morrisons was unable to undercut any of its competitors, regardless of card usage—its loyalty reduction amounted to less than £1 in this instance.
Which? noted that Tesco shoppers with loyalty cards paid less than those at Sainsbury’s, also using cards.
What’s driving the price war?
With food price inflation still affecting households, the UK’s major supermarkets continue to battle over pricing. Loyalty schemes and price-matching campaigns have become central tools in that competition.
According to Which?, these tactics are influencing consumer behaviour. In 2023, 37% of shoppers reported switching their regular supermarket, while 45% said they had cut down on luxuries and treats to save money.
Aldi’s average basket: £129.25Getty Images
Bigger shop, different winner
Which? also conducted a separate price analysis of 192 branded items. In this case, Aldi and Lidl were excluded because they did not stock the full range of products.
Among the remaining retailers, Asda offered the best value at an average of £474.12, while Waitrose was again the most expensive at £538.33—a 14% difference.
Consumer advice
Which? retail editor Reena Sewraz urged shoppers to compare prices and take advantage of deals where possible. “Households are still contending with high food prices but our analysis shows it pays to shop around. Simply choosing one supermarket over another could save you 25 per cent,” she said.