Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Prison ‘not the best way to prevent extremism’

By Barnie Choudhury

Former BBC journalist

IN MARCH 2005, I was having coffee with an officer from the National Crime Squad, and she asked me what my biggest fear was post-9/11.


I knew children as young as seven were being groomed to sell drugs, and I had heard chatter from Muslim contacts that, in the same way, teenagers were being radicalised to embrace an extreme form of Islam. So, I said my biggest fear was a 14-year old strapping a home-made bomb to himself, going to school and blowing himself up. Four months later, something similar to this awful premonition played out in London.

In the following weeks and months, as I had done since September 11, 2001, I spoke to scores of Muslims. I wanted to get my head around why ordinary young people brought up in Britain, a mainly tolerant country, would kill themselves and innocents in such a horrific way. Yes, we had gone to war in Iraq on a false premise. Yes, we appeared to be doing America’s bidding. And yes, we seemed to Muslims to be too pro-Israeli. But that just did not explain why young people would commit carnage.

In 2006, the New Labour government introduced something called ‘Prevent’. Over several administrations the programme has changed, but ultimately it uses early intervention to try and stop different communities from being radicalised. On the face of it, this can only be a good idea. But Muslims I have spoken to are suspicious that it amounts to criminalising their youth. To some, the authorities have done little to gain the trust of communities. They feel everyone questions their motives and loyalty to Britain, and the presumption of innocence, enshrined in article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is not applied to them.

Their suspicions were reinforced when the United Nations, no less, criticised the UK government’s Prevent agenda. In 2017, a report said the policy was “unpredictable and potentially arbitrary” and it was “dividing, stigmatizing and alienating segments of the population”.

Now after the latest attack in London last week, the government made its case to change the early release of those convicted of terrorism. That, sadly, is not the answer.

The problem is that organised gangs and criminals – for that is what terrorists are – do not care about the niceties of law, ethics or values. Their only job is to kill people. Their sole intention is to bend us to their will by making us scared and driving us to our most basic instinct, do or die. Their aim is to create a world in their perverse image. For some Muslims, it is to make women subservient. For white right-wing supremacists, it is to rid the world of those who have a different skin colour.

As we have seen on the last two occasions, prison is ineffective. If anything, our jails are infested with hardcore radicals who feed off new inmates like parasites attacking a sick body. Locking them up and throwing away the key is one solution. But a better one is to try to find out the danger signs in the first place.

I am not clever. I just try to study habits. But it seems to me that some of our extremists come from poor, socially deprived areas, whose families are either too strict; have an ethos which segregates different cultures, creeds and religion; or feel they have no connection with their parents and relations. They are looking for a family. They are looking for a cause. They are looking for affirmation. How easy then to lavish love and affection by making these confused kids feel valued?

And this is where south Asians must intervene. We need to ask ourselves whether we are setting up our children to fail. With every passing generation, the need to stick to the values of ‘back home’ becomes stronger. We try to hang on to how our forefathers lived and extracted discipline. Yet visit some south Asian countries and you will find things have changed. Young girls wear skimpy tops, dance provocatively and drink whiskey shots in nightclubs; young men and women are homosexual; women can be leaders; and the world has not ended.

I am not saying that we abandon everything that is great about south Asian culture. What I am urging us to do is acknowledge that we can learn so much from a western way of life and, like our cooking, if we combine the best of the best, we produce a tastier dish and a safer world. Ultimately there is no brown race, there is no black race and there is no white race. There is just the human race.

More For You

Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: How history can shape a new narrative for Britain

Doreen Simson, 87, a child evacuee from London; 100-year-old former Wren Ruth Barnwell; and veteran Henry Rice, 98, in front of a full-size replica Spitfire during an event organised by SSAFA, the UK’s oldest Armed Forces charity, to launch the ‘VE Day 80: The Party’ countdown outside Royal Albert Hall, in London

Comment: How history can shape a new narrative for Britain

IT WAS a day of celebration on May 8, 1945.

Winning the war was no longer any kind of surprise. After all, Hitler had committed suicide. What had once seemed in deep peril a few years later had become a matter of time.

Keep ReadingShow less
Your brain is lying to you—and it’s costing you breakthroughs

Fresh eyes can expose what the Curse of Knowledge has hidden.

iStock

Your brain is lying to you—and it’s costing you breakthroughs

Susan Robertson

Leadership today can feel like flying a plane through dense fog.

You’re managing priorities, pressures, and people. You’re flying through turbulence, and the instruments keep changing. And still, you’re expected to chart a clear course, adapt to change in real time, and help others do the same.

Keep ReadingShow less