Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Prison ‘not the best way to prevent extremism’

By Barnie Choudhury

Former BBC journalist

IN MARCH 2005, I was having coffee with an officer from the National Crime Squad, and she asked me what my biggest fear was post-9/11.


I knew children as young as seven were being groomed to sell drugs, and I had heard chatter from Muslim contacts that, in the same way, teenagers were being radicalised to embrace an extreme form of Islam. So, I said my biggest fear was a 14-year old strapping a home-made bomb to himself, going to school and blowing himself up. Four months later, something similar to this awful premonition played out in London.

In the following weeks and months, as I had done since September 11, 2001, I spoke to scores of Muslims. I wanted to get my head around why ordinary young people brought up in Britain, a mainly tolerant country, would kill themselves and innocents in such a horrific way. Yes, we had gone to war in Iraq on a false premise. Yes, we appeared to be doing America’s bidding. And yes, we seemed to Muslims to be too pro-Israeli. But that just did not explain why young people would commit carnage.

In 2006, the New Labour government introduced something called ‘Prevent’. Over several administrations the programme has changed, but ultimately it uses early intervention to try and stop different communities from being radicalised. On the face of it, this can only be a good idea. But Muslims I have spoken to are suspicious that it amounts to criminalising their youth. To some, the authorities have done little to gain the trust of communities. They feel everyone questions their motives and loyalty to Britain, and the presumption of innocence, enshrined in article 11 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, is not applied to them.

Their suspicions were reinforced when the United Nations, no less, criticised the UK government’s Prevent agenda. In 2017, a report said the policy was “unpredictable and potentially arbitrary” and it was “dividing, stigmatizing and alienating segments of the population”.

Now after the latest attack in London last week, the government made its case to change the early release of those convicted of terrorism. That, sadly, is not the answer.

The problem is that organised gangs and criminals – for that is what terrorists are – do not care about the niceties of law, ethics or values. Their only job is to kill people. Their sole intention is to bend us to their will by making us scared and driving us to our most basic instinct, do or die. Their aim is to create a world in their perverse image. For some Muslims, it is to make women subservient. For white right-wing supremacists, it is to rid the world of those who have a different skin colour.

As we have seen on the last two occasions, prison is ineffective. If anything, our jails are infested with hardcore radicals who feed off new inmates like parasites attacking a sick body. Locking them up and throwing away the key is one solution. But a better one is to try to find out the danger signs in the first place.

I am not clever. I just try to study habits. But it seems to me that some of our extremists come from poor, socially deprived areas, whose families are either too strict; have an ethos which segregates different cultures, creeds and religion; or feel they have no connection with their parents and relations. They are looking for a family. They are looking for a cause. They are looking for affirmation. How easy then to lavish love and affection by making these confused kids feel valued?

And this is where south Asians must intervene. We need to ask ourselves whether we are setting up our children to fail. With every passing generation, the need to stick to the values of ‘back home’ becomes stronger. We try to hang on to how our forefathers lived and extracted discipline. Yet visit some south Asian countries and you will find things have changed. Young girls wear skimpy tops, dance provocatively and drink whiskey shots in nightclubs; young men and women are homosexual; women can be leaders; and the world has not ended.

I am not saying that we abandon everything that is great about south Asian culture. What I am urging us to do is acknowledge that we can learn so much from a western way of life and, like our cooking, if we combine the best of the best, we produce a tastier dish and a safer world. Ultimately there is no brown race, there is no black race and there is no white race. There is just the human race.

More For You

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

Higher education participation is 50 per cent for British south Asian students

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

THE headline in the Daily Telegraph read: An 18-year-old with a higher IQ than Stephen Hawking has passed 23 A-levels.

The gushing piece went on to report that Mahnoor Cheema, whose family originate from Pakistan, had also received an unconditional offer from Oxford University to read medicine.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories
of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal on Mandalay Hill in Burma at the position once held by Sikh machine gunners who fought to liberate the area

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal OBE VR

ACROSS the Asian subcontinent 80 years ago, the guns finally fell silent on August 15, the Second World War had truly ended.

Yet, in Britain, what became known as VJ Day often remains a distant afterthought, overshadowed by Victory in Europe against the Nazis, which is marked three months earlier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being

iStock

Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

Justice Rangajeeva Wimalasena

Judicial well-being has long been a taboo subject, despite the untold toll it has taken on judges who must grapple daily with the problems and traumas of others. Research shows that judicial stress is more pronounced among magistrates and trial judges, who routinely face intense caseloads and are exposed to distressing material. The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being. They ultimately affect the integrity of the institution and the quality of justice delivered. This is why judicial well-being requires serious recognition and priority.

As early as 1981, American clinical psychologist Isaiah M. Zimmerman presented one of the first and most comprehensive analyses of the impact of stress on judges. He identified a collection of stressors, including overwhelming caseloads, isolation, the pressure to maintain a strong public image, and the loneliness of the judicial role. He also highlighted deeply personal challenges such as midlife transitions, marital strain, and diminishing career satisfaction, all of which quietly but persistently erode judicial well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fauja Singh

Fauja Singh

Getty Images

What Fauja Singh taught me

I met Fauja Singh twice, once when we hiked Snowdon and I was in awe he was wearing shoes, not trainers and walking like a pro, no fear, just smiling away. I was struggling to do the hike with trainers. I remember my mum saying “what an inspiration”. He was a very humble and kind human being. The second time I met him was when I was at an event, and again, he just had such a radiant energy about him. He’s one of a kind and I’m blessed to have met him.

He wasn’t just a runner. He was a symbol. A living contradiction to everything we’re taught about age, limits, and when to stop dreaming. And now that he’s gone, it feels like a light has gone out—not just in Punjab or east London, but in the hearts of everyone who saw a bit of themselves in his journey.

Keep ReadingShow less
“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

Minreet with her mother

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

I was five years old when my parents first signed me up for a mini marathon. They were both keen runners and wanted me to follow in their footsteps. At the time, I hated it. Running felt like punishment — exhausting, uncomfortable, and something I never imagined I’d do by choice.

But one moment changed everything. I was 12, attending a gymnastics competition, and had gone to the car alone to grab my hula hoop. As I walked back, a group of men started shouting at me. They moved closer. I didn’t wait to hear what they had to say — I ran. Fast. My heart was pounding. It was the first time I felt afraid simply for existing in public as a young girl. I never told anyone. But I remember feeling thankful, strangely, that my parents had taught me how to run.

Keep ReadingShow less