Women from an Asian Muslim background should be offered childcare subsidies to help them tackle workplace discrimination, according to the chair of the Muslim Women’s Network. Shaista Gohir was responding to a Social Mobility Commission report which analysed school performance and career prospects along ethnic, gender and socioeconomic lines. It found that British Asian students, particularly Bangladeshi and Pakistani girls, are more likely than ever to succeed in school. However, this success is not translating into opportunity as they enter the labour market. Alan Milburn, chair of the commission, described its findings as a “broken mobility promise” for Asian Muslims, particularly women. “If you’re in a low-paying job, you likely can’t afford to pay high nursery fees and go to work, as this may not even cover the cost of childcare. It would be better just to stay at home,” Gohir said. “There are certain things that employers and governments could do, such as introducing more subsidies for childcare, which would help more women and more Muslim women go to work.” Along with flexible working hours for mothers, Gohir believes affordable childcare would provide Muslim women and females in general with more of an opportunity to pursue a career. The study, which was released last month, found that academic performance for Pakistani and Bangladeshi students has improved at a more rapid rate than any other ethnic group over the past decade. This high rate of academic success transcends socio-economic status, with nearly half of Bangladeshi and over a third of Pakistani students among the poorest 20 per cent progressing to university. This success is not reflected in wages, as Bangladeshi and Pakistani women still earn less than their counterparts from other ethnic groups and are less likely to hold managerial or professional occupations than their male counterparts, despite achieving greater qualifications in school. The report also found that Bangladeshi women are over-represented in clerical and secretarial jobs. The research presents several explanations for both rising academic performance and stagnant levels of opportunity outside of school. It states that discrimination in the workplace puts certain groups at a distinct disadvantage, referring to previous research that shows ethnic discrimination affects women disproportionately. Muslim women, particularly those who express their faith or culture outwardly by wearing the hijab, for example, experience a greater degree of discrimination than other groups. Gohir said that although workplace discrimination is a common problem for many of the women she speaks to, including those in highly skilled roles such as lawyers, the reluctance of many to come forward with complaints makes it difficult to measure the extent of the problem. “A lot of people don’t complain because they are scared of losing their job or losing promotion prospects, even if that is the issue they want to complain about,” she said. “They are also worried about not being able to get a reference. “If you take a discrimination case to tribunal it often costs a lot of money, so that is a barrier in itself. Everything is stacked against the person wanting to complain.” Naz Shah, Labour MP for Bradford West, likened the discrimination faced by these women to the bias faced by all females, particularly ethnic minorities, in the workplace in the past. “During my lifetime, we have made lots of progression for women’s equality,” she said. “Look at the hijab – it’s the age-old argument over what women wear and how we judge women based on what they wear, only now it has shifted to Muslim women. We need to have those debates and conversations in order to raise awareness and we need to be clear about who is affected by discrimination. “The government needs to listen to women and their concerns, and also talk to employers and engage them about diversity and the benefits of diversity.” Parental and family influence also plays a major role in both academic performance and career opportunities, according to the analysis. The report found that while parental expectations regarding school performance are typically higher among families that enjoy a higher socioeconomic status, the same was true among lower status families of certain ethnicities as well, such as Asians. Asian and ethnically mixed students were also found to be more likely than other groups to have parents with higher levels of engagement with their education. For parents born overseas, the level of expectation and involvement they place in their children’s academic performance tended to fall in line with the status they enjoyed in their home country, rather than their current status in the UK. Pakistani and Bangladeshi women, however, were under more pressure to marry and have children, rather than pursue a career, than other groups. Bangladeshi women are also less likely to migrate internally than any other group, opting to stay in the same area as their parents even after marriage, which negatively affected their career opportunities. Shah left school at the age of 12 but later went on to build a successful career as an NHS commissioner and chair of a mental health charity. She said that while this [pressure to marry and have children] may be true in some parts of the community, the majority have shifted their views to be more supportive of women pursuing a career, citing the increasing number of Asian Muslim women attending universities. “It’s no different to when we made it illegal to ask a woman her age under the age discrimination and gender discrimination acts… The difference with a woman wearing a hijab is that it is very visible. Regardless of whether or not she is of childbearing age, the discrimination is very visible and in your face,” Shah said. “From a government perspective, we need to tackle this head-on and actually do more engagement, and not apply the one-size-fits-all approach, which is what the government tends to do at times.” The report recommends that schools, universities and employers should provide “carefully targeted support” to ensure Muslim women are able to achieve their career ambitions and progress in the workplace once they leave the world of academia. How this support is provided, however, varies between schools, according to Bart Shaw, lead author of the report. Shaw said: “There’s not just one default way for schools to provide this kind of support. “Schools are often mindful of the particular demographic breakdown of their schools and recognise that there may be problems for girls of certain ethnicities, though many may not. “The report is encouraging people to think in those terms and consider the particular issues around access to the labour market that affect their students.” The Department for Education (DfE) responded with their plans to increase social mobility for disadvantaged students, though were unable to offer any solutions specifically addressing young Asian Muslim women. “We are working to make more good school places available, in more parts of the country, so that every child can have access to an education that will unlock their potential,” a DfE spokesperson said.
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

England is preparing tougher rules to prevent pupils from accessing mobile phones during the school day, with schools facing questions over enforcement and funding
iStock
England pupil mobile phone policy: Will schools have the resources to enforce it?
Nov 10, 2026
- Schools will have to go beyond policies that allow pupils to keep switched-off phones in their bags.
- Head teachers' unions warn that secure storage systems could create significant costs.
- Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are taking different approaches to restricting phones in schools.
Schools in England are preparing for a stricter approach to mobile phones, with pupils expected to be unable to access their devices at any point during the school day from September 2027. But while ministers want to move beyond policies that allow phones to remain switched off in school bags, head teachers are questioning how they will pay for the change.
The government is strengthening its statutory guidance to ensure schools adopt measures that keep phones physically out of pupils' reach, rather than simply requiring them to remain unseen and unheard.
Education Secretary Lucy Powell said the government's message to parents and pupils was that "school is for learning and friendship, not scrolling".
The Department for Education said access to phones risks pulling children away from their learning and from each other.
The announcement builds on existing restrictions. Statutory guidance became effective on June 29, 2026, requiring schools in England to have policies that prevent pupils from accessing mobile phones throughout the school day, including lessons, breaks and lunchtime. Schools were expected to begin following it from September 1.
However, the existing guidance leaves head teachers with flexibility over how they enforce the rules. Some schools have adopted a "no see, no hear" approach, allowing pupils to keep their phones in their bags as long as they are not visible or audible.
The revised guidance, expected to take effect in September 2027, will go further by requiring schools to ensure pupils cannot access their devices during the day.
How will schools enforce the stricter phone rules?
Schools will be able to decide how to implement the updated requirements, depending on their facilities and individual circumstances.
Some have already invested in sealed pouches that prevent pupils from using their phones until they are unlocked. Others provide secure lockers, collect devices at the beginning of the school day or prohibit pupils from bringing phones onto school grounds.
These approaches, however, require different levels of investment and staff involvement.
Paul Whiteman, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT), said mobile phones could create safety issues and become an unhelpful distraction during the school day. But he warned that more robust restrictions would come at a cost.
Pepe Di'Iasio, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said the new guidance provided some clarity but cautioned that schools could not simply make phones disappear.
"If all schools are going to be expected to have lockable pouches or other secure storage facilities for every pupil, the cost involved will be very significant indeed," he said.
"This is not feasible unless the government puts in the funding required to meet these costs."
The financial question could become particularly important for schools with large pupil populations, where buying individual storage pouches or installing secure facilities could require substantial upfront spending.
The unions are therefore asking the government to provide additional financial support rather than expecting schools to absorb the expense within already stretched budgets.
Why does the government want phones out of schools?
Ministers argue that restricting access to smartphones will help pupils concentrate, reduce disruption and encourage more face-to-face interaction.
Dame Rachel de Souza, Children's Commissioner for England, welcomed stronger action to prevent phones from distracting pupils and disrupting the school day.
Charlotte Ashton, co-founder of campaign group Generation Focus, also supported the move, arguing that existing "no see, no hear" policies were not working effectively. She said pupils were still "TikToking in the toilets".
"Ultimately, we need to get to a point where it's not normal for every single child to have a personal internet-enabled device in their pockets with them 24/7," she said.
The announcement also drew support from the opposition. Shadow Education Secretary Laura Trott said she was "delighted that Labour have finally listened to us and agreed to properly ban smartphones in schools".
However, she questioned the government's wider approach to technology in classrooms, arguing that its policies lacked joined-up thinking. She also welcomed a review of safety standards for educational technology, which ministers have announced alongside the phone guidance changes.
The debate is not limited to England. Education is a devolved responsibility, meaning Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland can adopt their own approaches.
Scotland's government has proposed legislation to restrict personal phone use in schools and launched a consultation on the issue. In Wales, the Senedd voted against introducing a national statutory ban, leaving schools with flexibility over their own policies.
Northern Ireland's Education Minister Paul Givan launched a 12-week consultation in August on whether mobile phones should be prohibited in schools by law.
The school restrictions are also separate from the UK government's planned social media restrictions for under-16s, expected to begin in March 2027. Those measures would prevent children from accessing platforms including Instagram, Snapchat and TikTok.
For schools in England, the immediate challenge is turning the government's expectations into workable policies. While there is growing political and public support for reducing smartphone distractions, the success of the stricter rules will depend on consistent enforcement, practical arrangements and whether schools receive the resources to implement them.
The government wants school days without accessible phones. Head teachers now want to know who will pay to make that possible.
Keep ReadingShow less
Most Popular
News
Study attributes decline in academic freedom to restriction of free speech
Vibhuti Pathak
05 April 2024










