Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nhlanhla Nene: South Africa's Zuma Fired Me for Blocking Russian Nuclear Power Deal

South Africa's finance minister Nhlanhla Nene told a judicial corruption inquiry on Wednesday (3) that he was fired by former president Jacob Zuma for refusing to approve a £76.69 billion nuclear power deal with Russia in 2015.

Nene is the highest profile figure to give evidence at a probe into alleged influence-peddling by the Gupta family, friends of Zuma, who are accused of using their relationship with the former leader to unduly win state contracts.


Zuma has repeatedly denied accusations by his opponents that he pushed for a deal with President Vladimir Putin at a BRICS summit for Russia to build a fleet of nuclear power stations.

Opposition politicians and local investigative journalists say the proposed deal - which would have been the biggest state contract in South Africa's history - would have included huge kickbacks for Zuma and the Gupta family.

The Indian-born brothers, Ajay, Atul, and Rajesh have been accused of using their ties with Zuma to siphon off billions of rand in state funds and of inappropriately influencing cabinet appointments.

They left South Africa earlier this year around the time Zuma resigned under pressure from his own party and the authorities are seeking their return to face prosecution.

Nene, in the first public account of the nuclear negotiations, said Zuma became hostile towards him at a meeting at the summit when he refused to sign a guarantee letter Zuma wanted to present to Putin while in Russia.

“It was a very tense meeting that ended with us just being instructed by the president to go and find a solution, which we didn’t find," Nene told the inquiry.

“I told the president in the meeting that I could not sign the letter without having first interrogated the financial and fiscal implications”

A spokesman for Zuma did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Kremlin did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Allegations of corruption have been swirling around Zuma and the Gupta brothers for years, but the current inquiry is for the first time allowing senior government officials to give their accounts to the public.

"Nene's testimony is extraordinarily important. This is the person who was CEO when it comes to the public purse," political analyst Ralph Mathekga said.

"Before this evidence, it was difficult to connect the dots to Zuma. But this is a smoking gun which shows Zuma was a protagonist in this affair."

Zuma fired Nene in December 2015 and replaced him with largely unknown lawmaker Des van Rooyen, sending markets into a tailspin before Zuma appointed investor-friendly Pravin Gordhan as his third finance minister in the space of four days.

Zuma's successor as president Cyril Ramaphosa re-appointed Nene finance minister in February this year.

Nene told the inquiry he lost his job for not approving contracts that would benefit the Gupta family, particularly the Russian nuclear deal. His decision to reject a proposed national airline route to Sudan on grounds that it was not commercially viable also contributed to his sacking.

"I do believe I was removed as minister of finance for my refusal to toe the line in relation to certain projects," he said.

Nene's supporters have portrayed him as a principled official who sought to defend the country's strained public finances against corrupt attacks from Zuma and his allies.

However, his detractors, including the radical opposition Economic Freedom Fighters, say he was involved in corrupt deals with the Guptas when he was deputy finance minister and head of the state pension fund from 2008-2014.

Nene told the inquiry he met the Gupta brothers several times, including four visits to their family home in Johannesburg between 2010-2013, but said it was normal practise to meet business leaders as a deputy finance minister.

Reuters

More For You

Bars and restaurants

Bars and restaurants saw critical distress jump 41.7 per cent.

(Representative image-iStock)

Tax reforms threaten Britain’s family firms as financial strain deepens

Highlights

  • Family businesses make up 90 per cent of UK private firms and employ 13.9 m people.
  • Nearly 50,000 businesses now in critical financial distress, up 21 per cent year-on-year.
  • Ethnic minority businesses contribute £74 bn annually despite facing funding barriers.
Family-owned companies, the backbone of Britain’s private sector, are warning that looming inheritance tax reforms could cripple investment, drive jobs overseas, and weaken an economy already battling rising financial distress.
Ranjit Singh Boparan started with a small bank loan and a butcher’s knife. Today, his 2 Sisters Food Group employs 25,000 people and supplies chicken and ready meals to almost every major UK supermarket. He notes that family businesses like his have been forgotten by the government.

“To get the UK economy going you’ve got to use family businesses as the backbone of it, not the BlackRocks or the Vanguards,” Boparan told The Times. He says overseas investment giants “will come in, they will take and they will go. He adds they have no allegiance to the country.” Boparan describes the proposed changes as “horrific” for family businesses and warns they threaten food security as companies think twice about investing.

Family firms make up 90 per cent of all private sector companies in the UK and employ 13.9 million people. These businesses contributed £575 billion to the economy in 2020, accounting for 51 per cent of all private sector employment.

Keep ReadingShow less