Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

MPs reject May's EU withdrawal deal

BRITISH MPs on Friday (29) rejected Prime Minister Theresa May's EU divorce deal for a third time, opening the way for a long delay to Brexit - or a potentially catastophic "no deal" withdrawal in two weeks.

Lawmakers in parliament's lower House of Commons defied May's plea to end the political deadlock that has plunged Britain into crisis, and defeated her withdrawal agreement by 344 votes to 286.


It is yet another blow to a prime minister who has all but lost control of her government and the Brexit process - particularly after she offered to quit if MPs backed the deal.

Britain had been due to leave the EU on Friday, the long-heralded March 29 "Independence Day", but faced with chaos in Westminster, May asked European leaders last week for a little more time.

She now faces having to return in the coming days to explain what happens next, with speculation in Brussels of an emergency summit on April 10 or 11.

The EU has set a deadline for April 12 for a decision, with two likely options: Britain leaves with no deal at all, or agrees a lengthy extension to allow time for a new approach.

May has said it would be "unacceptable" to ask voters to take part in forthcoming European Parliament elections, three years after they voted in a 2016 referendum to leave the EU.

But while "no deal" remains the default legal option, MPs have repeatedly voted against this, fearing catastrophe if Britain severs ties with its closest trading partner with no plan in place.The failure by parliament to agree the terms of its exit from European Union has left Britain in limbo, with business leaders and trade unions warning of a "national emergency".

Voters are divided, many of them anxious and angry, and May blames MPs - but they in turn accuse her of refusing to countenance any alternative to her unpopular deal.

"She is, frankly, unable to govern," opposition Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said, urging her "either to listen and change course or to go".

Tired of waiting, MPs this week gave themselves unprecedented powers to vote on a range of options for Britain's future relationship with the EU.

A prosal for a new customs union got close to passing in a first round on Wednesday, as did a plan for a referendum on May's deal, with more voting planned next Monday and Wednesday.

The risk that MPs decide to agree closer ties to the EU, or even stop it altogether, has focused the minds of some Brexit supporters, who reluctantly agreed to back May's deal.

Her offer on Wednesday to quit if it passes also helped persuade some of her staunchest critics, including former foreign minister Boris Johnson.

But others refused, including May's Northern Irish allies, the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP), which says planned arrangements for the Irish border after Brexit are unacceptable.

"We are not prepared to see our constitutional position altered by Brussels in a fit of pique for daring to leave the EU," said MP Sammy Wilson, the DUP's Brexit spokesman.

More For You

Digital ID

The UK is one of the few European countries without any ID card, and the concept has historically faced resistance.

Getty Images

Digital ID plans spark row amid far-right misinformation

Highlights

  • Prime minister Keir Starmer announced digital ID cards will be introduced by 2029.
  • Public support dropped from 53 per cent to 31 per cent following the announcement.
  • Government insists scheme will not be compulsory and won't store vaccination data.
Plans for a nationwide digital ID system in the UK have triggered widespread public concern, with critics including far-right politicians spreading unproven claims about government control.

Prime minister Keir Starmer announced in September that the digital ID card would be introduced by 2029. The government has stated it will not be mandatory but will be required to prove the right to work.

However, prominent figures have made controversial claims about the scheme. Critics warn that digital ID will be used to store data on vaccinations and carbon footprints and limit access to flying and food, allegations the government has vehemently denied.

Keep ReadingShow less