London police failing over exploitation of kids: watchdog
The inspectorate says the Metropolitan Police’s response to the criminal and sexual exploitation of children is “not currently effective”
By Shajil KumarFeb 10, 2024
London's police force is leaving children at risk of exploitation and should implement nearly a dozen reforms to improve, a damning report by Britain's law enforcement watchdog said on Friday.
The Metropolitan Police's response to the criminal and sexual exploitation of children is "not currently effective", His Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire and Rescue Services (HMICFRS) concluded in the 51-page report.
The inspectorate, which classes all under-18s as vulnerable because they are "less able to take care of themselves or protect themselves from exploitation", said it had found evidence of some good work by the Met to protect children.
But it added Britain's biggest police force was "not doing enough" and needed to improve both its practices and its police training.
The inspectorate examined 244 Met investigations and graded over half of them as "inadequate".
HMICFRS was particularly alarmed by the Met's ineffective response when children were reported missing, and its failure to investigate sufficiently when children were at risk of exploitation for sex or by other criminals.
It was so concerned about these particular shortcomings that it raised them publicly in October, before the inspection ended.
The HMICFRS also said police officers and staff used language that blamed the victims in dozens of instances.
It said the Met used different IT systems for different tasks which "weren't linked" up.
Many officers failed to understand "the links between missing children and exploitation".
And when children were reported missing, "many officers and staff don't understand the risk and simply wait for them to turn up".
The report cited the case of a 14-year-old girl -- deemed at risk of sexual and criminal exploitation by drug dealing networks -- reported missing by her foster mother.
The HMICFRS review found police efforts to trace her were "limited" and supervisors repeatedly said "her behaviour wasn't out of character".
It also noted "many missed opportunities to identify suspects and disrupt their activity, leaving children exposed to risk".
The inspectorate suggested 11 reforms.
The Met apologised, said the findings were "deeply concerning" and set out plans it said would urgently improve its response.
"We are putting more police resource into this area and retraining officers to have a better understanding of the complexities of child exploitation," Met Commander Kevin Southworth said. (AFP)
THE north east economy is at risk of losing tens of millions of pounds if a new tax on international student fees is imposed, university and business leaders have warned.
Labour ministers have proposed charging a six per cent levy on tuition fees paid by overseas students in England, which education secretary Bridget Phillipson announced will be used to pay for the return of means-tested maintenance grants for some learners from lower-income households.
But the organisation representing some of England’s top universities, including Newcastle and Durham, claims the move is the “wrong way” to reintroduce the grants abolished under the Conservatives in 2016 and risks doing “more harm than good”.
There are concerns that universities would pass the impact of the levy onto international students through tuition fee hikes, rather than absorbing the costs at a time when the higher education sector has been experiencing major budget cuts, resulting in a fall in the number of people coming from overseas to study in the UK.
international students make up almost a third of the student population in the north east
The Russell Group said international students currently make up almost a third of the student population at its universities in the north east – and account for over a quarter of their collective income.
A study from the Higher Education Policy Institute found the levy would cost Durham University £10 million and Newcastle University £9m, putting them in the top twenty worst affected institutions in the country.
Research by Public First has also warned the north east stands to lose £87m in the first year of a levy due to projected falls in international student numbers, which it estimates at 77,000 nationally over five years.
It names Newcastle Central and West as the constituency potentially suffering the eighth biggest hit in the country, just under £30m in Gross Value Added (GVA), with the City of Durham predicted to lose £14.5m and Sunderland Central £12.5m.
Henri Murison, chief executive of the Northern Powerhouse Partnership, said bringing back maintenance grants would help more young people in the north access higher education – but that funding them through this levy “risks undermining the financial sustainability of universities”.
Murison added: “This will mean losing a significant amount of the subsidy for domestic students that their international counterparts currently provide. If there are over 135,000 fewer places across our leading world-class institutions, that means fewer opportunities – especially for the most disadvantaged.
“We know that in cities like Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Newcastle there are constituencies with over £30 million in GVA to lose along with similar places in London, West Midlands and Scotland.”
Newcastle University said last year it was facing a £35m financial black hole due to a decline in international students and has since slashed £20m from its wage bill, with cuts having sparked prolonged strike action from academics.
Durham University also announced in January it had to cut costs by £20m over two years.
Dr Tim Bradshaw, chief executive of the Russell Group, said: “Universities like Newcastle and Durham, and many others across the north east contribute a huge amount to their local areas – from providing skills and training to the local workforce, to ground-breaking research and infrastructure projects.
“If the proposed levy goes ahead, it will add greater pressure on an already financially precarious sector to the detriment of the very students and communities that government is looking to support.
“Reinstating maintenance grants has been a long-standing campaign for us, because we know financial pressures are a huge challenge for students – especially those from under-privileged backgrounds. In fact, universities already spend millions of pounds each year on widening access, including bursaries and hardship funds. This spending would also be at risk if the levy goes ahead.”
The Department for Education was contacted for a response.
It said last month the levy would “maintain a competitive offer for international students while ensuring the benefits are shared more visibly at home, directly benefiting disadvantaged domestic students”.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.