Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Iran has a way of dragging wars on’

The rising price of oil is affect­ing economies around the world. It is certain­ly devastating the lives of the poorest in India.

trump

Trump has appealed to China, France, Ja­pan, South Korea and the UK to join a “team effort” to open up the chokepoint through which a fifth of the world’s oil passes.

Roberto Schmidt/Getty Images

US PRESIDENT Donald Trump’s special military operation in Iran, which he started with Israel on February 28, is not ending as quickly as he might have hoped.

Meanwhile, the rising price of oil is affect­ing economies around the world. It is certain­ly devastating the lives of the poorest in India.


Iran, like quicksand, has the ability to suck people into chaos. I remember being in Be­hesht-e Zahra Cemetery in Tehran and wit­nessing the burial of the first Iranian casual­ties after Iraq had launched an attack to try and topple Ayatollah Khomeini.

war A Thai bulk carrier attacked while passing through the Strait of Hormuz last Wednesday (11)Handout/Royal Thai Navy/AFP via Getty Image

Saddam Hussein was encouraged by the likes of Donald Rumsfeld that Iran could be defeated within a couple of weeks. What the Iraqis had not anticipated was that young Ira­nians from the Pasdaran Corps would throw themselves in front of Iraqi tanks. I subse­quently visited the front lines. The Iranians, being generous hosts, offered me martyrdom as an expression of friendship to an Indian. The war lasted eight years.

Jaishankar S JaishankarRamil Sitdikov/Pool/AFP via Getty Images

I am not predicting Trump’s war will also last eight years but the Americans and the Is­raelis could get bogged down if the Iranian regime refuses to fall. That might require American boots on the ground. Replacing the regime would also be a problem since the en­tire ruling apparatus is hardline.

The politics of the Iran war are also chang­ing. In Britain, criticism of Sir Keir Starmer for not giving his full support to Trump is be­coming less strident with each passing day.

Trump has appealed to China, France, Ja­pan, South Korea and the UK to join a “team effort” to open up the chokepoint through which a fifth of the world’s oil passes.

“It’s only appropriate that people who are the beneficiaries of the Strait (of Hormuz) will help to make sure that nothing bad hap­pens there,” Trump told the Financial Times. “If there’s no response or if it’s a negative re­sponse I think it will be very bad for the fu­ture of Nato.”

“We’ve essentially decimated Iran,” he claimed. “They have no navy, no anti-air­craft, no air force, everything is gone. The on­ly thing they can do is make a little trouble by putting a mine in the water — a nuisance, but the nuisance can cause problems.”

India’s external affairs minister, S Jais­hankar, revealed he had managed to get two Indian-flagged gas tankers to pass through the Strait on Saturday.

“I am at the moment engaged in talking to them and my talking has yielded some results,” he told the FT. “This is ongoing. If it is yielding results for me, I would naturally continue to look at it. Certainly, from In­dia’s perspective, it is better that we reason and we co-ordinate and we get a so­lution than we don’t. So if that sort of allows other people to engage, I think the world is better off for it.”

Jaishankar denied that Iran had received anything in exchange, and cited a “history of dealing with each other ... which is the basis on which I engaged ... It’s not an exchange is­sue ... India and Iran have a relationship. And this is a conflict that we regard as something very unfortunate.”

But talking to Iran is not an op­tion for Trump because that would mean recognising the re­gime in Tehran – and betraying the demonstrators he had prom­ised to help.

And back in Britain, chancel­lor Rachel Reeves will be able to blame her mismanagement of the economy on the Iran war.

More For You

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar speaks to media infront of the party’s Ad Van Campaign on May 04, 2026 in Bathgate, Scotland

Getty Images

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Sunder Katwala

The tremors of the May 2026 elections could shift the tectonic plates of British politics. Attention will quickly turn to the Westminster aftershocks, including what the fallout of these national elections in Scotland and Wales alongside local elections across much of England, mean for Sir Keir Starmer’s future. Yet these seismic electoral upheavals merit scrutiny in their own right.

Wales is set for a once a century political earthquake. Labour has not just led the Welsh government since devolution began in 1999 - but won the most votes in every national election in Wales since 1922. Yet it now trails third, burdened by double incumbency in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, with the party watching the Welsh nationalists of Plaid Cymru and Reform’s pro-Brexit populists compete to top the polls. That contrast has polarised Wales - by age and geography - though a broad majority would prefer a government led by Plaid Cymru’s Rhun Ap Iowerth, with two-thirds hoping to keep Reform out.

Scotland could offer a rare pocket of political stability. John Swinney is the third Scottish first minister of a turbulent term after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, but may now secure a fifth term for his Scottish National Party. The trick to bucking the anti-incumbent trend has been to leverage his Edinburgh government being comparatively less unpopular than its London counterpart. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar sought to demonstrate his own distance from Westminster by calling for Starmer to resign, but his bid to lead Scotland, and become its second Asian First Minister, looks set to fall short.

Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap IorwerthGetty Images

Keep ReadingShow less