India urges citizens to leave Tehran as Israel-Iran conflict escalates
The total number of affected Indian nationals has not been disclosed. As per government data from last year, around 10,000 Indians were in Iran.
Iranian flags fly as fire and smoke from an Israeli attack on Sharan Oil depot rise, following Israeli strikes on Iran, in Tehran onJune 15, 2025. (Photo: Reuters)
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
INDIA on Tuesday advised its citizens to leave Tehran as the conflict between Israel and Iran continued to intensify. Some Indian nationals have already left the country through its borders.
The Indian Ministry of External Affairs said Indian students have already exited the Iranian capital, while other residents who could manage transport on their own have been advised to leave due to the deteriorating situation.
"Residents who are self sufficient in terms of transport have also been advised to move out of the city in view of the developing situation," the foreign ministry said in a statement.
According to the ministry, "some Indians have been facilitated to leave Iran through the border with Armenia", located hundreds of kilometres northwest of Tehran.
The total number of affected Indian nationals has not been disclosed. As per government data from last year, around 10,000 Indians were in Iran.
India has also issued an advisory for its citizens in Israel, urging them to stay vigilant.
The advisory followed a call by US president Donald Trump, an ally of Israel, for "everyone" to "immediately" leave Tehran. The city has a population of nearly 10 million.
Fifth day of strikes between Israel and Iran
The hostilities between Israel and Iran continued on Tuesday, marking the fifth consecutive day of strikes in what has become their most intense confrontation yet. The two countries have long been engaged in covert operations and proxy conflicts, but the current fighting has raised fears of a wider conflict across the Middle East.
Israel said it launched "extensive" strikes on missile and drone sites in western Iran on Tuesday. Explosions and smoke were reported in the city of Tabriz, which hosts a major air force base.
AFP journalists reported loud explosions over Jerusalem and Tel Aviv. According to police, shrapnel from incoming fire caused damage in both cities but there were no casualties. The fire service in Tel Aviv responded to a blaze in the commercial hub.
Israel’s attacks have so far killed at least 224 people and injured more than 1,200 in Iran, according to Iran’s health ministry on Sunday. No updated figures have been released since then.
In response, Iran’s attacks on Israel have killed 24 people and wounded 592, according to the office of Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Israel also claimed to have killed several top Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists, and destroyed about one third of Iran’s surface-to-surface missile launchers.
"We have now achieved full air superiority over Tehran," said Israeli military spokesperson Effie Defrin.
Israel outlines campaign goals
Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel’s military campaign aimed to bring about "radical changes" in Iran and was "changing the face of the Middle East".
He listed three primary objectives: the elimination of Iran’s nuclear programme, the destruction of its ballistic missile production capability, and the dismantling of what he called the "axis of terrorism", referring to Iranian-backed groups in the region.
"We will do what is necessary to achieve these goals, and we are well coordinated with the United States," Netanyahu said. He did not rule out targeting Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Evacuations and international responses
As fighting escalated, Trump posted on social media, "Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" but did not provide further details. India and China also issued warnings to their citizens. China asked its nationals to leave Israel "as soon as possible", while Thailand announced preparations to evacuate its citizens from both Iran and Israel.
Earlier, Israel had issued an evacuation order for northern District 3 of Tehran, where the headquarters of state broadcaster IRIB is located. The building was later struck by Israeli fire. AFP journalists in Tehran reported hearing loud explosions throughout the city. The broadcaster said three people were killed in the attack.
Iran described the strike as a "war crime". In retaliation, it issued evacuation warnings for Israeli news channels.
Residential areas in both countries have been affected by the ongoing airstrikes. Iran said its targets in Israel included “sensitive and important” security locations as well as residences of military commanders and scientists.
A military official from Iran said on Tuesday that overnight drone attacks had destroyed “strategic positions” in Tel Aviv and Haifa.
Calls for diplomacy
World leaders have continued to urge both sides to de-escalate the conflict.
China called on Iran and Israel to “immediately” reduce tensions and “prevent the region from falling into greater turmoil”. Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan told Iranian president Ebrahim Raisi that Ankara was ready to play a "facilitating role" in ending the fighting.
Prime minister Keir Starmer said there was "a consensus for de-escalation" among G7 leaders, who are meeting in Canada. French president Emmanuel Macron urged both countries to end strikes on civilians and warned against efforts to overthrow Iran’s government, calling it a "strategic error".
Trump told reporters at the G7 that “Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk... before it's too late.” Later, he said he would leave the G7 early to work on something “much bigger” than a ceasefire.
Nuclear talks between the US and Iran had been scheduled for Sunday but were cancelled after Israel began its attacks.
The G7, in a joint statement, called for de-escalation in the region, starting with the Israel-Iran conflict.
Iran’s nuclear sites under scrutiny
Israel’s military campaign is partly aimed at countering what it sees as existential threats from Iran’s nuclear and missile programmes.
The UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has been monitoring developments. Its head, Rafael Grossi, said on Monday there was “no indication of a physical attack” on the underground part of the Natanz uranium enrichment site. He added that radiation levels outside the facility remained “at normal levels”.
The IAEA had earlier confirmed that a key above-ground section of the Natanz site had been destroyed.
THE Indian Embassy in Ireland on Friday (1) issued an advisory expressing safety concerns following recent attacks in and around the capital Dublin and urging Indian citizens to take safety precautions.
"There has been an increase in the instances of physical attacks reported against Indian citizens in Ireland recently," said the advisory issued online.
"The embassy is in touch with the authorities concerned in Ireland in this regard. At the same time, all Indian citizens in Ireland are advised to take reasonable precautions for their personal security and avoid deserted areas, especially at unsocial hours," it added.
It also provided emergency embassy contact details as 0899423734 and cons.dublin@mea.gov.in.
The Gardaí, as the police are known in Ireland, had opened an investigation into the case and Indian ambassador to Ireland Akhilesh Mishra was amongst those who took to social media to express shock over the attack.
"Regarding the recent incident of physical attack on an Indian national that happened in Tallaght, Dublin, the Embassy is in touch with the victim and his family. All the requisite assistance is being offered. The Embassy is also in touch with the relevant Irish authorities in this regard," the embassy said in a social media post days after the incident.
A Stand Against Racism protest was also held by the local community in condemnation of what was described as a "vicious racist attack" and to express solidarity with migrants to the region.
Earlier this week, a Dublin resident Dr Santosh Yadav took to his LinkedIn account to post details of a "brutal, unprovoked racist attack" near his apartment.
Yadav, an entrepreneur and AI expert, stressed that it was not an isolated incident and called for "concrete measures" from the governments of Ireland and India to ensure Indians feel safe to walk the streets of Dublin without fear.
His post reads: "After having dinner, I was walking near my apartment when a group of six teenagers attacked me from behind. They snatched my glasses, breaking them, and then beat me relentlessly across my head, face, neck, chest, hands, and legs—leaving me bleeding on the pavement. I managed to call the Gardaí, and an ambulance took me to Blanchardstown Hospital. The medical team confirmed my cheekbone is fractured, and I have now been referred for specialist care.
"This is not an isolated incident. Racist attacks on Indian men and other minorities are surging across Dublin—on buses, in housing estates, and on public streets. Yet, the government is silent. There is no action being taken against these perpetrators. They run free and are emboldened to attack again."
Fine Gael party councillor for Tallaght South, Baby Pereppadan, was amongst those who expressed concern following last month's attack.
"People need to understand that many Indian people moving to Ireland are here on work permits, to study and work in the healthcare sector or in IT and so on, providing critical skills," he said.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
An aerial photograph taken on March 21, 2025 shows planes parked on the tarmac of Heathrow Airport. (Photo: Getty Images)
LONDON's Heathrow Airport on Friday announced a £49-billion expansion plan that includes the construction of a third runway, approved by the UK government after years of legal disputes.
The third runway is expected to cost £21 bn, with flights projected to begin within the next decade. The remaining privately-funded investment will be used for airport expansion and modernisation.
Heathrow, Europe’s busiest airport by passenger numbers, said the project would add at least 30 new daily routes, increase domestic connections and improve flight schedules. The expansion could raise the airport’s annual passenger capacity from 84 million to as many as 150 million.
"It has never been more important or urgent to expand Heathrow," said chief executive Thomas Woldbye. "We are effectively operating at capacity to the detriment of trade and connectivity," he added.
The plan has faced opposition from environmentalists, local residents, London mayor Sadiq Khan and some Labour MPs. However, the Labour government supported the runway in January as part of efforts to boost economic growth.
Heathrow has submitted its proposal for the 3,500-metre runway to the UK government, which has also invited a rival bid.
Green trade-offs
The proposal allocates £12 bn for a new terminal and £15 bn for modernisation. Heathrow stated, "A third runway and supporting infrastructure can be ready within a decade, and the full investment across all terminals would take place over the coming decades."
Prime minister Keir Starmer aims to deliver major infrastructure projects to revive the UK economy. The government is also expected to back expansion at Gatwick Airport in October, after recent upgrades to Stansted, Luton and City airports.
The Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that Heathrow could proceed with the third runway, overturning a previous decision blocking it on environmental grounds.
Douglas Parr, policy director for Greenpeace UK, said local residents "will see their lives put on hold for a few more years while more money and time is wasted on a doomed scheme." He added the plans "export more tourism wealth out of the UK in the most polluting way possible."
Arora Group, a major Heathrow landowner, said Thursday it would submit a rival proposal for a shorter third runway, promising lower costs and less disruption to residents and the environment. "This is the first time the government has invited a competing proposal for Heathrow expansion," the company said.
The new investment plan comes alongside Heathrow’s existing plans to spend £10 bn over five years on upgrades to increase passenger numbers, funded largely through higher airline charges.
A 30-year-old British Sikh man has been stabbed to death in east London in an attack involving people known to each other, the UK police believe.
Gurmuk Singh, known as Gary, died last week in Felbrigge Road, Ilford in east London, and was formally named by Metropolitan Police on Thursday (31).
The force said its officers had arrested Amardeep Singh, 27, on suspicion of the murder that took place on July 23. He has since been charged with one count of murder and remains in custody until his next court appearance at London's Old Bailey for trial on January 5, 2026.
“Police were called by the London Ambulance Service to reports of an altercation at a residential address,” said the Met Police statement. “Officers attended as Gary was treated for stab wounds. Despite the best efforts of the paramedics, he sadly died at the scene,” it said.
Detectives also arrested a 29-year-old man and three women aged 29, 30 and 54 in connection with the fatal stabbing. They have all since been released on bail until October while the police investigation continues.
“Gary was a well-loved man who had a remarkable ability to connect with everyone he met,” his family said in a statement released by the police.
“A true social butterfly, nothing brought him more joy than being surrounded by his family. Gary will be deeply missed, but his memory will live on in our hearts forever,” they said.
A post-mortem examination has indicated the cause of death as a stab wound to the left thigh, with an inquest opened and adjourned while the police investigation into the attack is ongoing.
Detective chief inspector Joanna Yorke from the Met's Specialist Crime North unit said at the time of the attack that detectives believed it was an “isolated incident”.
“An incident of this nature sends shockwaves throughout the local area and we understand the direct impact on the community. People can expect to see an uptick in police presence while officers conduct initial investigations. Please do not hesitate to speak to them if you have any concerns at all,” she said.
(PTI)
Keep ReadingShow less
Trump confirmed the 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports will take effect on August 1. (Photo: Getty Images)
Trump announces 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods starting August 1
US signs new trade and oil development deal with Pakistan
Opposition in India calls tariff a diplomatic failure
Economists warn India’s growth could be hit by up to 40 basis points
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump has imposed a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods and announced a trade deal with Pakistan to jointly develop its “massive oil reserves”. The moves have drawn strong political reactions in India and reshaped regional trade dynamics.
Trump said on Truth Social, “We have just concluded a deal with the country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive oil reserves. We are in the process of choosing the oil company that will lead this partnership. Who knows, maybe they’ll be selling oil to India some day!”
It is unclear which reserves Trump referred to. Pakistan has long claimed to have oil deposits along its coast but has not been able to exploit them. The country currently imports oil from the Middle East.
Pakistan’s prime minister Shehbaz Sharif thanked Trump for the “historic” trade agreement. “I wish to convey my profound thanks to president Trump @realDonaldTrump for his leadership role in finalization of the historic US-Pakistan trade agreement, successfully concluded by our two sides in Washington, last night,” he wrote on X. “This landmark deal will enhance our growing cooperation so as to expand the frontiers of our enduring partnership in days to come.”
Radio Pakistan reported the agreement was concluded in Washington during a meeting between Pakistan’s finance minister Muhammad Aurangzeb, US secretary of commerce Howard Lutnick, and US trade representative ambassador Jamieson Greer. It said the deal would boost trade, expand market access, attract investment and promote cooperation in sectors including energy, mines and minerals, IT, and cryptocurrency.
Tariff threat triggers political backlash in India
Trump confirmed the 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports will take effect on August 1. He added an unspecified penalty over India’s Russian dealings and its membership in the BRICS grouping. Calling India’s trade policies “most strenuous and obnoxious”, he wrote, “All things not good! India will therefore be paying a tariff of 25 per cent, plus a penalty for the above, starting on August first.”
While confirming ongoing talks, Trump said, “…We are going to see, we're negotiating with India right now,” describing India’s tariffs as “one of the highest tariffs in the world”.
India’s government said it had “taken note” of the announcement and was committed to pursuing a “fair, balanced and mutually beneficial” trade agreement with the US.
Opposition parties called the tariff a diplomatic failure. Congress submitted a notice in parliament demanding a debate on the “government's economic and diplomatic failure in preventing the imposition of 25 per cent US tariffs plus penalties on Indian exports”.
“This development reflects a broader collapse of foreign policy under the Modi government,” a Congress lawmaker said. Commerce minister Piyush Goyal is expected to brief parliament on the matter.
Economic and market impact
Economists warned the tariffs could hurt India’s manufacturing plans and shave up to 40 basis points off growth for the year ending March 2026.
Markets reacted to the news, with the Nifty 50 and BSE Sensex falling about 0.6 per cent each. The rupee dropped to 87.74, its lowest in more than five months, before recovering slightly.
Priyanka Kishore, an economist at Asia Decoded, said, “While further trade talks may bring the tariff rate down, it appears unlikely that India will secure a significantly better outcome than its eastern neighbours.”
US tariffs higher on India than other countries
The US tariff on India is higher than on other countries: 20 per cent on Vietnam, 19 per cent on Indonesia, and 15 per cent on Japanese and European Union exports.
Trump’s announcement of the Pakistan deal and increased engagement with Islamabad comes after the India-Pakistan conflict in May, which has strained US-India trade talks. Congress said, “The country is now bearing the cost of Narendra Modi's friendship.”
Russia remained India’s largest oil supplier in the first half of 2025, making up 35 per cent of its imports. Trump wrote, “I don’t care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.”
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Concern grows in Britain over anti-immigrant protests and the risk of renewed unrest this summer
‘I predict a riot’ sang the Kaiser Chiefs two decades ago. That has become a popular past-time this summer too.
It is exactly a year since the terrible murders of three girls in Southport triggered shock and grief nationwide - along with racist efforts to stoke violent retribution against Muslims and asylum seekers with no connection to that evil crime. Few of the conditions of last summer’s disorder have gone away, as the recent State of Us report sets out. The febrile tinderbox of social media can put events or even rumours to incendiary purposes. Yet there is a crucial difference between vigilance and alarmism – between identifying risks to mitigate them, or seeking to stoke them into reality.
Epping became a protest epicentre after an asylum seeker was charged with sexual assault. Most protesters were peaceful, expressing concerns for community safety. Some chanted to send all asylum seekers back. Others sought violence – assaulting the police for protecting asylum seekers. The protests became a Rorschach Test of parallel perceptions. Right-ofcentre commentators decried stigmatising concerned local mums as far right, while progressives noted how often the organisers speaking into the microphones were far right agitators hoping to extend ‘remigration’ to all migrants and ethnic minorities.
Claims about a nationwide surge of protest were exaggerated. Half a dozen scrappy anti-asylum protests struggled to muster a thousand people nationwide. Many were football lads, at a loose end in the close season. Fifty times as many people took to the streets for trans rights as protested asylum hotels last weekend.
But if larger protests seem less newsworthy without a sense that it might all kick off, does that mean that broadcaster’s ‘news values’ risk inadvertently incentivising disorder over democratic voice?
The idea of ‘legitimate concerns’ matters. It is a mistake to dismiss the concept as dog whistling or pandering to prejudice. Yet the key to getting that boundary right risks getting overlooked. Any contentful concept of ‘legitimate concerns’ depends on defining which are illegitimate too. Much more attention is needed, especially, to how to challenge the fusion of asylum with anti-Muslim tropes in driving both casual prejudices and those most open to being socialised towards violence.
Keir Starmer spoke articulately about both legitimate concerns and the illegitimacy of racist violence in his post-riots party c o n f e r e n c e speech. His government risked leaving out half of that argument last week. Ministers were so concerned to (rightly) defend democratic protest and criticism of asylum policy that they seemed (wrongly) mute in challenging extreme racist agitators too. An implausibly inauthentic version of Keir Starmer’s public voice can be found on his X, where somebody tweets in the prime minister’s name, invariably about asylum, as robustly as possible. ‘The problem is, it doesn’t sound like him at all,’ one usually loyal backbencher told me.
This simulacrum of the prime minister would doubtless triple down on the ‘island of strangers’ comments that the real Keir Starmer chose to retract, albeit blurring the boundaries of precisely what he would rather have said.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper maintains a more measured voice, emphasising that the government will be judged on practical outcomes, not the polarised shouting matches of protests and counter-protests. Net migration has halved from exceptional levels – but few will notice those numbers coming down while the lack of control over asylum is so visible. The number of asylum seekers in hotels has halved too – but the 30,000 who remain are much more visible than the shrinking numbers. The events of the last month should catalyse practical ideas about how to clear the asylum backlog faster and close down the use of hotels for asylum.
A new social cohesion task force is beavering away inside Downing Street to identify the missing strategy foundations, though it began too late this Spring for the government to develop a long-term policy before this anniversary. An interim update to Cabinet from deputy prime minister Angela Rayner emphasised the role of socio-economic deprivation, and the government’s commitment to invest in neighbourhoods. That is undoubtedly one important part of the jigsaw, though the centre-left does tend to persistently underestimate the role of identity and culture. The latest IpsosMori Issues Index shows the salience of immigration is pretty even across deprived and affluent areas, peaking in the second most affluent quintile: places like leafy Epping.
How Essex police handled protest and counter-protest this weekend - protecting lawful protest with no tolerance for intimidation and disruption - is a good model to maximise the chance that riotous prophecies fail.
The simple insistence that all face-masks are removed could be the key to deterring violence this summer, despite the febrile atmosphere. But avoiding riots should be nobody’s test of cohesion. A strategy to get tough on the causes of disorder remains embryonic. That it would take the sustained work of a generation is all the more reason to make a start soon.
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.