Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Helping those at risk of forced marriage

By Kaly Kaul QC and

Neelam Sarkaria 


KALY KAUL QC said: “The courts and prosecut­ing authorities recognise that there is consider­able fear of reporting your family and that victims are afraid of repercussions if they seek help,” while Neelam Sarkaria added: “If you are at risk of a forced marriage, support is available for you re­gardless of your sex, sexuality and social back­ground, provided you are ordinarily resident in the UK. Forced marriage falls within the new government definition of domestic abuse and continues to be treated seriously.”

Forced marriage, which is against the law, be­came a criminal offence in June 2014. Forcing a person into marriage is a criminal offence and if your abuser is found guilty of committing this of­fence, they can be sentenced to prison for up to seven years. Breaching a forced marriage protec­tion order is also a criminal offence and if the abuser is found guilty of breaching the order, they can be sentenced to prison for up to five years. Be­fore then, the police and prosecution would look at what other offences could be charged, such as kid­napping, false imprisonment and assault.

The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) data from its 2017/2018 Violence Against Women and Girls report indicated that the number of convictions rose from 32 in 2016-17 to 37 in 2017-18.

It is difficult for victims, women and girls, men and boys to report their families for forced marriage. It is important to appreciate that the authori­ties know and understand the fears and sensitivi­ties of coming forward and have measures in place to protect and support those either at risk or al­ready in such a marriage. Ask for help if you need it or you know someone who is in that position.

Forced marriage protection orders (FMPO), which have been available since November 24, 2008, are really important in protecting those at risk of forced marriage, or those who need protection after a forced marriage has taken place. Applications are made in family court and since 2014, breaches of these orders are dealt with in criminal courts. They protect anyone at risk of forced marriage/or has been forced into a marriage; a ‘relevant third party’ (ie a local authority); any other person who is given permission (leave) by the court. FMPOs can include, for example, handing over passports and travel doc­uments or stopping someone being taken abroad.

Family court data suggests that there is more ac­tivity in family courts than criminal courts in cases of forced marriage. The number of applications and orders made for FMPOs is very small. In 2018, there were 322 applications and 324 orders made, the highest annual totals since their introduction. Of the applications, 72 per cent of the applicants were aged 17 and under.

Support for victims is available from the Foreign Office, which has a special department to assist people, and a number of charities (desperately in need of funding) are available for advice. Legal aid is also available. It is very important, particularly in these times, when many young people are cut off from their schools and colleges, their teachers and friends, that everyone is aware of the support avail­able and are not afraid to ask for it.

It may be the case that marriage ceremonies are being conducted online, as no travel is permitted, and that type of marriage would still be an offence if it was without the consent of one or both of those involved, and was accompanied by some form of violence or threat, or other type of coercion.

Don’t feel alone, and don’t turn a blind eye. We must all protect those at risk.

The Forced Marriage Unit can be reached at 020 70080151 or fmu@fco.gov.uk. The Forced Marriage Facebook page and Twitter @FMUnit are all avail­able during the pandemic. There are also specific charities that deal with forced marriage, such as the Sharan Project, which supports women and girls between the ages of 16-24 who are at risk or have been subjected to a forced marriage.

Kaly Kaul QC is Circuit judge sitting at Wood Green crown court in London with a special interest in domestic violence/coercive behaviour.  Neelam Sarkaria is Barrister and international justice and gender-based violence expert.

The authors are also vice-presi­dents of the Association of Women Barristers.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less