Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Government must explain reason for Uppal’s sudden departure: Employers’ Group

AN EMPLOYERS’ group has criticised the government for failing to clear up confusion about the departure of the Small Business Commissioner Paul Uppal.

Uppal, 52, who stepped down as commissioner in October, has said he felt he had been forced out but was not sure why.


The Forum of Private Business said that it had received a “completely inadequate” response after requests to the business department for an explanation of why its Small Business commissioner left his role suddenly.

The post was created in 2016 to mediate in payment disputes on behalf of small companies and to promote fairer treatment of suppliers.

Ian Cass, managing director of the forum, said the government must explain the circumstances surrounding Uppal’s departure because the issue was “very important to our members and all the other small and micro businesses that Paul had worked so hard to understand, build trust with, support and help”.

Uppal left after concerns were expressed about his proposed involvement in a separate banking redress scheme being set up to help small companies.

Officials are understood to have told the former MP that his plans to agree to an unpaid, interim role in the business banking resolution service, which is backed by the government, was a potential conflict of interest.

But Uppal said the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy failed to explain how the advisory position, which he did not take up, represented a potential conflict. He questioned whether there was a “short-sighted” decision to push him out.

Cass wrote to Kelly Tolhurst, the smallbusiness minister, in November demanding an explanation. But Paula Lovitt, head of small business payments policy at the business department, said she was “unable to discuss this matter” because of a commitment to “treating people fairly and with consideration at all times”.

A permanent replacement for Uppal has yet to be found.

The business department has previously said the role “ended in line with departmental guidelines following a breach of the terms of his appointment”.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

ChatGPT for teenagers

OpenAI is introducing a separate ChatGPT experience designed to make AI use safer for teenagers

iStock

Would you let your teenager talk to ChatGPT alone? OpenAI is adding new safeguards

  • ChatGPT for Teens is designed for users aged 13 to 17.
  • The new version restricts self-harm, sexual and romantic content and discourages emotional attachment to the chatbot.
  • Parents can set quiet hours and receive limited safety alerts when high-risk situations arise.

Would you let your teenager talk to an AI chatbot on their own? That question is becoming harder to ignore as teenagers turn to artificial intelligence not just for homework, but also for everyday questions and companionship. OpenAI has now launched ChatGPT for Teens, a version aimed at users aged 13 to 17 with stronger protections around some of the risks associated with younger users.

The new experience places tighter restrictions around topics including suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and romantic or sexual conversations. It is also designed to stop the chatbot from suggesting that it has feelings for a teenager, or that it is conscious and capable of experiencing emotions.

Keep ReadingShow less