Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Give people a vote on expanding the Senedd’

Plan is a waste of taxpayer money, says Welsh Tory shadow minister

‘Give people a vote on expanding the Senedd’

HAVING been elected as the first woman of colour to the Welsh parliament in May 2021, I know there has been immense pressure on the Labour government to see more diversity in the Senedd.

Labour and Plaid Cymru are determined to squeeze more politicians into the Senedd, a contentious move which comes with a price tag of around £100 million – something I deem to be a huge waste of taxpayer money.


Their pipeline project – which the Welsh Conservatives are vehemently against – would see an additional 36 politicians in Cardiff Bay, taking the total to 96.

People up and down the country are being faced with ever-increasing cost-of-living pressures and the last thing they need right now is to be footing the bill for Labour and Plaid’s pet project.

Our NHS is under immense pressure, with 700,000 people languishing on treatment waiting lists. People are also struggling to get a doctor’s appointment or a check-up at the dentist.

I believe what Wales needs most is more doctors, nurses, dentists and teachers, not politicians.

Not only are Mark Drakeford and Adam Price looking to put more bums on seats, but they also want to impose a gender quota.

With the fear of sounding like a modern-day Martin Luther King, I have a dream to see the Welsh parliament be as diverse and inclusive as possible.

I am astounded that since its creation some 23 years ago, the Senedd has only seen four ethnic minority men and just one woman to date. I aspire to see a Senedd that has more women, more people of colour, more disabled politicians, and more members of the LGBTQ+ community.

LEAD Comment Natasha Asghar MS byline pic 2 Natasha Asghar

However, politicians should be elected on merit, not simply because they tick the right boxes, which is what I fear will happen under these plans.

I am proud of the fact that I am the first woman of colour to be elected to the Senedd, but I did not get here simply because of the colour of my skin.

I was democratically elected on my own merit by the people of South East Wales through equal competition.

In my view, there should be no gender balance. No all-women shortlist. No positive discrimination.

People across Wales who we, as politicians serve, deserve to know that Senedd members are in post because they are good at their job – not because they tick all the boxes to fulfil an artificial quota.

Over the past few weeks, I have been inundated with emails and calls from my constituents raising concerns and their objections to the Senedd expansion scheme.

They are clear in their views that the money should be spent on healthcare, education, infrastructure, and roads instead of extra politicians – and I wholeheartedly agree with them.

The proposed changes claim to strengthen the Welsh parliament and to better represent the people of Wales, but how can that be true when it is being forced upon them? As a general rule, nothing that has been imposed on the public without their consent has been successful.

My Welsh Conservative colleagues and I believe that Labour and Plaid should let the public have the final say on these plans.

Everyone talks about ‘living in a democracy’, so let’s see just how democratic the Welsh parliament and this Labour government are in reality.

If the Labour and Plaid coalition group – a term they absolutely despise – are so confident that this expansion scheme will be supported by residents in all four corners of the country, if they are so confident that the people of Wales are happy Natasha Asgharto see up to £100 million spent on more politicians; and if they are so confident these proposals will better serve the people of Wales and give them a stronger voice, then why not put it to the people?

Give them a referendum and let them voice for themselves whether they want more politicians in Cardiff Bay.

This is the people’s Senedd, so let the people decide on the future of Wales.

(The author is a member of the Senedd for South East Wales and Welsh Conservative shadow minister for transport and technology) 

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less