Pooja Pillai is an entertainment journalist with Asian Media Group, where she covers cinema, pop culture, internet trends, and the politics of representation. Her work spans interviews, cultural features, and social commentary across digital platforms.
She began her reporting career as a news anchor, scripting and presenting stories for a regional newsroom. With a background in journalism and media studies, she has since built a body of work exploring how entertainment intersects with social and cultural shifts, particularly through a South Indian lens.
She brings both newsroom rigour and narrative curiosity to her work, and believes the best stories don’t just inform — they reveal what we didn’t know we needed to hear.
Gary Oldman becomes Sir Gary in a Windsor Castle ceremony.
He once joked about the royals never giving him a nod.
The actor's career is a wild ride from Sid Vicious to Winston Churchill.
Fans know him best today as the grubby spymaster in Slow Horses.
This honour lands six years after his Oscar win for The Darkest Hour.
So, it is finally official. Gary Oldman has officially become Sir Gary after receiving his knighthood at Windsor Castle. This feels like a long time coming, does it not? The actor, famous for completely vanishing into his roles, received the recognition for his services to drama. It is a proper cap on a career where he has played everyone from a punk rocker to a prime minister and even mentioned a few years back that the royal honour had somehow passed him by.
Gary Oldman becomes Sir Gary in a Windsor Castle ceremony Getty Images
That time he wondered about a royal nod
Back in 2023, he was talking to the BBC and the subject came up. He said, pretty bluntly, "I do not know why. You should ask them. No nod from the royals, but there we are. Maybe it is in my future." It is what makes the whole thing feel so pointed.
Well, guess what? The future turned up on Tuesday. You have to think that moment, that little public wondering, made walking into that castle today feel a bit sweeter.
Gary Oldman receiving his knighthood at Windsor CastleGetty Images
What even is a defining Gary Oldman role?
Seriously, try to pick one. Is it the raw terror of Sid Vicious? The dark grandeur of Dracula? Or is it Harry Potter's godfather, Sirius Black, for a whole generation? For awards voters, it was his transformation into Winston Churchill that finally got him the Oscar. He is one of those rare actors who is not just playing a part, he seems to become someone else entirely. That is the sheer breadth this knighthood is acknowledging.
If you want a taste of his current genius, just switch on Apple TV. He is the star of Slow Horses, playing Jackson Lamb, the most brilliantly offensive MI5 agent ever put on screen. He is almost unrecognisable, and the show is a smash. Just as he receives this lifetime achievement award, he is also giving one of the most talked-about performances on television, proving he is nowhere near done.
This is not just another award to stick on the mantle. This is the one that etches his name into the official story of British drama. From his brutal, personal film Nil By Mouth to blockbuster Batman films and now a hit spy series, his path has been wildly unpredictable. The knighthood sort of pulls all those threads together. It is the final word on a career that has been anything but ordinary.
Telugu blockbusters like RRR and Pushpa are drawing UK crowds.
Bollywood flops have pushed audiences to look elsewhere.
British Asians connect with stronger, rooted Telugu heroes.
Pawan Kalyan’s They Call Him OG smashed overseas records.
More UK cinemas now screen Telugu films to meet demand.
The queue for a new Bollywood film was quiet. But around the corner, snaking down the street in a British city, a different queue was buzzing. It was not for a Hollywood blockbuster. The chatter was not in Hindi. It was in Telugu, English, and regional British Asian dialects, all waiting for a Pawan Kalyan film. This scene is becoming the new normal.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences AI generated
When the default setting broke
For years, Bollywood was the default. It was the comforting, familiar voice of 'home' for millions in the diaspora. The formulas started to feel tired. We'd grown up watching those Bollywood stars, trusting them to deliver. But something broke, and suddenly, they couldn't get people through the door. When films like Laal Singh Chaddha and Bachchhan Paandey arrived, they just failed to connect. It felt like we were being shown a plastic-wrapped India, scrubbed clean for an international crowd we no longer recognised. That old thread that tied us to them? It snapped. And in the quiet that followed, you could hear something else roaring to life.
Formulaic Hindi films lose ground as Telugu cinema delivers spectacle and authenticity that resonate with UK desi audiences AI generated
The pan-Indian quake
The rise of Telugu cinema in the UK is not an accident. It started with movies that spoke the language of sheer scale fluently. Baahubali wasn't just a movie. It was a proper legend, the kind that felt ancient and massive. It proved, without a doubt, that a story spun in India could stand tall on any screen in the world. You could feel the rumble in your seat. Then you had RRR and Pushpa crash in. They took that energy, the spectacle, and turned it into something you could chant along to. They weren't apologising for what they were, and this was the undiluted escapism fans were starving for. This was what they called "maximum entertainment," and it was a gut punch of fun.
For British Asian audiences, many with roots in smaller towns and villages, this felt more authentic than Bollywood’s increasingly urban, Western-facing stories. It was a sensibility that translated perfectly, speaking a visual language of spectacle that needed no translation.
Telugu films, by contrast, doubled down on identifiable emotion and a kind of unapologetic heroism. Their protagonists are often loud, rooted, and purposeful; they fight, they sing, they love on camera without irony.
But the shift goes deeper than just spectacle. It is about the kind of hero you want to see on screen. For a long time, mainstream British Asian representation often came with a side of comedy. The culture was sometimes the punchline: the accented parents, the generational clashes played for laughs. It was a representation that could feel limiting.
There is also a practical reason: a bigger, better diasporic infrastructure. Telugu speakers are numerous in the UK and beyond; distributors and cinemas have responded. Once theatres start screening Telugu films regularly, community momentum builds.
If there is a risk, it is twofold: Tollywood must be careful not to trade complexity for bravado, and Bollywood must decide whether to listen. For British Asians, cinema is a resource, a way to rehearse belonging.
He is almost a phenomenon in Telugu cinema. His influence doesn't end there. He's the Deputy Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh, a leader who talks about Hindu culture with a fighter's intensity. When you combine that with a fanbase whose loyalty feels less like admiration and more like a fundamental belief, you get a force that's hard to ignore. The release of They Call Him OG proved it. Tickets for the world's second-largest IMAX screen, all the way in Melbourne, vanished in two flat minutes. Across international markets, the film was running circles around Bollywood's biggest offerings.
So, you sit back and look at all that, and the question just forms itself: Why does this resonate so powerfully?
For a younger British Asian generation navigating dual identities, Kalyan represents an unapologetic cultural confidence. He is not diluted. He is not a stereotype. He is power and agency wrapped in a star’s persona. He offers an "oppositional gaze," a direct challenge to the narratives where their identity was the source of conflict, not strength, and choosing him is maybe a way of reclaiming a narrative.
Pawan Kalyan’s OG breaks overseas records with sold-out shows days before release Instagram/ogmovieofficial
The end of passive viewing?
This is not just about swapping one industry for another. It is a sign of a community maturing, of knowing what it wants to see reflected in the stories it consumes. They are no longer passive recipients of whatever cinema is handed down to them. They are active choosers. They are voting with their tickets for stories that feel epic, heroes that feel powerful, and a cultural voice that does not ask for permission to be loud, proud, and entirely itself.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Bollywood’s queen meets Bridgerton’s star: South Asian stardom on the Paris runway
A backstage selfie of Aishwarya Rai Bachchan and Simone Ashley went viral.
Aishwarya Rai walked the runway in a dramatic Indian sherwani.
Her outfit featured 10-inch diamond-embellished cuffs.
Ashley represents the rising power of the diaspora.
She is best known for her lead role in Bridgerton.
That photo wasn’t planned. It was a quick snap backstage in Paris. Two women, Aishwarya Rai and Simone Ashley, leaned together for a second. One is a titan of Bollywood, a global icon for decades. The other is a British star who smashed her way into one of Netflix’s biggest shows.
The image went viral instantly. But why did this particular picture hit so hard? It’s because it shows a fracture in the old rules. For years, these two paths to fame, one from the heart of Indian cinema, the other from the Western diaspora, ran on separate tracks. That selfie is the moment the tracks collided.
Bollywood icon Aishwarya Rai and Bridgerton’s Simone Ashley shared a rare backstage moment at Paris Fashion WeekInstagram/simoneashleyworld
The sovereign and the storm
You have to understand, Aishwarya Rai didn't just show up in Paris. She owned the room, wearing a custom Manish Malhotra sherwani. This was no accident. It was a message. The outfit, with those massive 10-inch cuffs embroidered with diamonds, screamed what everyone already knew: she doesn't just represent herself, she was bringing an entire culture with her. Her journey was one of sovereign expansion: from Miss World, to Bollywood royalty, to a Cannes fixture and being a global ambassador for over twenty years.
Aishwarya stuns in a Manish Malhotra sherwaniGetty Images
Then there’s Simone Ashley. She didn't emerge from a system that anointed her. In fact, she crashed into one. Her role as Kate Sharma in Bridgerton can be called as a 'cultural detonation’. In a genre built on white European fantasy, she became the lead, the object of desire, the "storm" that upended the entire ton. Simone took the role that, for generations, nobody thought a woman like her could have and made diaspora the main character.
Simone Ashley walks the runway during the "You're Worth It" L'Or\u00e9al Paris Womenswear Spring/Summer 2026 show as part of Paris Fashion Week Getty Images
Why the selfie mattered
Selfies don’t always shift industries. This one mattered because it compressed several stories at once: a veteran who built a bridge between Bollywood and the world, and a diaspora actor who rose inside Western storytelling. The image almost flattened geography, like it made Mumbai and London feel like neighbours for a moment.
So, what collapsed the chasm? Don't just credit the fashion houses, credit the algorithm. The true designer of this moment is the streaming revolution. Netflix, Amazon, Disney+ demolished cultural borders.
They created a new, shared reality. A teenager in London binge-watches Bridgerton the same weekend her cousin in Mumbai does. A family in Ohio discovers Aishwarya’s classic Devdas with a single click. This constant, fluid exchange has rewired our expectations. We no longer see "Indian cinema" and "British TV" as separate categories. They are just… shows. On the same screen. This is in fact the new, borderless territory where Aishwarya and Simone can finally meet as equals.
Beauty and fashion are commercial machines. Aishwarya’s long-term role as a global L’Oréal ambassador is a branded pipeline that benefits from moments like this. For brands, a shared image of two recognisable South Asian stars expands audience reach across markets in India, the UK, and diaspora communities, and creates headline value that’s cheaper than a campaign shoot.
There’s a less flashy truth under the glitter. The selfie is not a solution for structural gaps. Casting still leans on old networks; creative lead roles, production power, and money don’t shift overnight because an image goes viral. But the photograph is a lever, because it changes perception, and perception nudges hiring, and hiring changes stories. Two women sharing a frame doesn’t fix policy, but it nudges culture. That nudge matters faster now because audiences, not just executives, are watching.
It’s the moment we can finally see that the two separate, parallel struggles: the struggle for global recognition from within Bollywood, and the struggle for mainstream acceptance from within the diaspora, have, against all odds, merged into a single, powerful front.
The photo is a lie because it makes it look easy, like it was always destined to happen. But let's be real. That moment rests on the back of decades of quiet fights, of doors being forced open, and a tech revolution that finally gave us a screen, and a world big enough for all of our stories.
Fans noticed Deepika Padukone and Farah Khan were not following each other on Instagram.
This sparked immediate speculation of a feud over Farah's on-air comments.
Farah Khan has directly addressed the rumours, calling them a "fake controversy."
She revealed a long-standing pact to avoid Instagram communication with Deepika.
The situation highlights how quickly online speculation can spiral from minor incidents.
Another day, another Bollywood storm in a teacup. This time, the internet's detective work landed on Deepika Padukone and Farah Khan's Instagram profiles, where a perceived 'unfollow' sparked a tidal wave of gossip. Farah Khan cracked a few jokes on her YouTube channel, and let's just say the internet ran with it. Everyone immediately connected her remarks to all that news about Deepika's new rules for her workday. But what actually went down is, as usual, a lot simpler than the headlines would have you believe.
What really happened with the Instagram unfollow fiasco?
Turns out, there was no unfollowing spree because there was nothing to unfollow. Farah Khan swiftly shut down the rumours, explaining that she and Deepika have never followed each other on the platform. In fact, it was a conscious choice. The director revealed a pact made years ago on the sets of Happy New Year. They agreed to skip the Instagram formalities: no follows, no public birthday posts, and stick to direct messages and phone calls instead. So much for that digital feud.
Farah Khan's Instagram story Instagram Screengrab/farahkhankunder
Were Farah Khan's comments a direct dig?
In her vlogs, Farah's banter with her cook, Dilip, included a line about "Deepika Padukone ab sirf 8 ghanta shoot karti hai" and it was instantly dissected as a critique. But Farah's clarification paints a different picture. She insists the comment was a light-hearted jab to tease Dilip about his own two-hour workdays and not a pointed remark aimed at the actor. She even mentioned being among the first to visit Deepika and Ranveer after their daughter Dua was born. Context, it seems, is the first casualty in the race for a viral story.
It's a familiar pattern. A snippet of conversation, a social media glitch, or a red carpet moment gets isolated and amplified into a narrative. Deepika Padukone's work hour demands are a genuine industry topic, so any comment gets grafted onto that storyline. Outlets and social media feeds need content, and a fallout between a legendary director and her mentee is irresistible fuel. It almost creates a feedback loop where speculation is reported as news, which in turn generates more speculation.
What does this reveal about modern celebrity culture?
This entire episode brings to light the bizarre space where celebrities now exist, a space where a private pact must be explained publicly and a joke to a cook becomes a national headline. The line between their real lives and the online narrative about their lives is constantly blurred. For stars like Deepika Padukone, every professional decision and every old friend's quip becomes a story online for the internet to dissect, often missing the human reality underneath the noise.
The Bollywood actor is making his first foray into Tollywood with this mythological epic.
He will portray Shukracharya, the revered and cunning guru to the asuras.
The first-look poster shows a completely transformed Khanna amidst a chaotic landscape.
The film is the next chapter in Prasanth Varma's expanding cinematic universe.
Production is moving fast, aiming to finish by the end of this year.
Akshaye Khanna has just grabbed a role that is going to change things up. He is joining the Telugu film Mahakali, and honestly, it is a genius move. It is not a safe debut; he is going all in as Shukracharya, that famously powerful guru to the asuras. This throws him right into the thick of Prasanth Varma’s cinematic universe, a series that has seriously shaken up how we see mythological tales on screen.
He is playing Shukracharya, which is a pretty big deal. He is the demons' preceptor, known for his vast knowledge and cunning nature. It is the kind of role that demands serious screen presence, something Khanna has in spades, and the first-look poster they dropped confirms it. He is practically unrecognisable, standing there with this focused gaze, a long beard, and robes, with what appears to be a cosmic storm forming behind him. It is quite the contrast from the roles he frequently plays.
— (@)
How does Mahakali fit into the PVCU?
This is the third film in that universe, after HanuMan and the upcoming Adhira. Think of it like everything is connected. Mahakali is another piece of that puzzle, building out this world where ancient gods and modern superhero sensibilities crash into each other. Prasanth Varma is steering the ship as the creator, but the directing duties for this one are handled by Puja Aparna Kolluru. So, while the vision is consistent, a new director will inevitably bring her own style and flavour to the Mahakali story.
Well, for starters, he is a proper Bollywood name choosing a Telugu debut in a powerful role. That does not happen every day. Then there is the look. The moment the poster hit the internet, people started drawing parallels. His get-up, the hair, the robes, it reminded many of Amitabh Bachchan's Ashwatthama from Kalki 2898 AD. The comments were flooded with jokes like "Amitabh Bachchan 40% downloaded." This means people are already talking, and that is half the battle won.
— (@)
When can we expect the film?
The crew is operating at a fast pace. According to the producers, they want to complete the entire filming process by December. That is a fairly quick turnaround. They have got a solid crew behind it too, with Suresh Ragutu on cinematography and Smaran Sai composing the score. No release date is locked in yet, but with filming expected to conclude in a few months, an announcement probably is not too far off.
Keep ReadingShow less
J K Rowling calls Emma Watson ignorant as old and new feminism collide in a bitter public feud
Rowling dismisses Watson's recent conciliatory tone as a calculated shift.
The author argues Watson's life of fame and wealth has left her ignorant of real-world issues.
A 2022 BAFTA speech and a poorly received note are cited as a major breaking point.
Rowling contrasts her own past poverty with Watson's privileged upbringing.
She firmly states that public disagreement from former collaborators warrants a public response.
The bitter divide between J K Rowling and the stars of her Harry Potter world has just gotten much deeper. In a raw and personal online post, the author tore into Emma Watson, attacking not just her opinions but her character. Rowling branded the actress as "ignorant," claiming her life of fame has left her utterly disconnected from reality. This comes immediately after Watson made a public attempt to soften their long-running and very public disagreement on transgender rights, a move that seems to have only made the Harry Potter feud worse.
J K Rowling calls Emma Watson ignorant as old and new feminism collide in a bitter public feud Getty Images
What did Emma Watson say about J K Rowling?
It all started on a podcast, with Watson chatting to host Jay Shetty about navigating personal relationships amid public disagreement. She spoke about hoping to keep loving people she doesn't necessarily agree with, a comment widely understood to be about Rowling. She fondly referred to the author as “Jo,” talking about treasuring their shared past. It sounded like a peace offering, or maybe she’s just tired of the whole mess. “I will never believe that one negates the other,” she said, trying to hold two opposing ideas in her hands at once. It was gentle. It was careful. And Rowling clearly hated every second of it.
This is where things got really nasty. She basically called Watson a rich kid who has no idea how the real world works. “Emma has so little experience of real life she’s ignorant of how ignorant she is.” She then drew a sharp line between their lives: Watson, a multimillionaire since her teens, versus Rowling herself, scribbling away in poverty while creating the entire Potter universe.
Her point? Watson can afford to champion certain ideologies from a cushy, protected bubble. Rowling, claiming her own gritty past, says she understands what’s really at stake for vulnerable women in public spaces. It’s the classic “you’ve never had it tough” argument.
— (@)
What was the final straw for J K Rowling?
Turns out, it was something years ago. She revealed the true "turning point" wasn't just Watson's public criticism, but a moment during the 2022 BAFTA Awards. Watson was on stage, and made a little quip about being there “for ALL the witches,” which everyone read as a sly dig at Rowling. But then, according to Rowling, Watson sent her a note. The note read: "I’m so sorry for what you’re going through."
It arrived when Rowling felt most exposed. She says the threats were at their worst; graphic promises of death, rape, and torture flooding in. Her security team had to tighten everything down. The fear for her family's safety was a constant worry. In that climate of genuine terror, Watson's note felt like a slap in the face. From Rowling's perspective, it was a hollow gesture, a one-line sympathy card offered after Watson had publicly poured fuel on the very fire causing the chaos.
— (@)
The generational lens shaping this conflict
Rowling's views come from a place of real struggle. She remembers living in poverty and struggling for everything. When she speaks of women's shelters and safe spaces, she is referring to physical protection for women based on their biological sex. These are real things to her, and she feels they should be safeguarded.
Watson sees things differently. She represents a newer way of thinking. Her focus is on identity and making sure everyone feels included. Her work with the UN and her public comments show this. She believes how people identify themselves is what matters most. For younger people, this makes perfect sense. For Rowling's generation, it can seem like it ignores real-world dangers.
Emma Watson reflects on her fallout with JK Rowling Getty Images
Two different ways of speaking out
Their conflict also shows how the rules for famous people have changed.
Watson's approach is modern. She is careful with her words, choosing to let her deeds speak for her. This works well today, where social media rewards this kind of subtle support.
Rowling slams Watson’s privileged perspective in trans rights clash revealing how generations see activism differentlyGetty Images
Rowling does things the old way. She writes long posts explaining exactly what she thinks. She isn't afraid to start a debate or stand alone in her opinion. She acts like someone who expects people to read her full argument and engage with it directly.
They're not just disagreeing about issues, they're using completely different playbooks from different times. One speaks in careful hints and shared understanding, the other in direct arguments and clear lines. No wonder they can't hear each other.