THE curator of a new exhibition on Queen Victoria at Kensington Palace, Polly Putnam, has been honest about not sanitising the nature of British rule in India.
For example, a caption to images of starving Indians taken from the Illustrated London News of 1877 could not be more blunt: “It is clear that British involvement in India was fundamentally exploitative. Food and profits were directed away from India towards Britain, which contributed to famines across the region. Between 1876 and 1878, an estimated 5.5 million people died from hunger in British territories.”
“However, Victoria’s relationship with India was a complex one and she had much personal sympathy towards the Indian people,” the caption does add.
The exhibition, which opened on May 24, marks the 200th anniversary of Victoria’s birth at Kensington Palace and will run until January 20, 2020.
It is in two interlinked parts – Victoria: A Royal Childhood and Victoria: Woman and Crown.
The first tells of Victoria’s upbringing until she became queen at the age of 18 in 1837. She was subjected to Kensington Palace rules.
“The Princess is not to have her own bedroom; she is to sleep in the same room as her mother, the Duchess (of Kent),” was one rule.
“She is not allowed to walk down the stairs unaccompanied,” and “She is to have a simple diet, only eating roast mutton,” were others.
Her governess, Baroness Lehzen, introduced the book where Victoria had to describe her own behaviour. Comments that the self-aware royal put down ranged from “good” to “naughty and vulgar” to “Very Very Very Very Horribly Naughty!!!!!”
Although her mother’s first language was German, Victoria was brought up as an English girl. She was also taught drawing, and later as Queen, she would sketch not only Maharaja Duleep Singh, but also various Indians to whom she granted an audience.
Despite all the rules, she had a much happier childhood than she liked to pretend.
The second part of the exhibition tells of her 63-year reign and focuses in part on her relationship with India. Displays include Duleep’s jacket and slippers, and a replica of the uncut Kohinoor diamond and how it came into Victoria’s possession. Also on show is an outfit where the organza and lace had Indian designs.
There is a statuette of Munshi Abdul Karim, who came to her from India as a servant but “became her first real Indian friend”. Victoria’s ‘Hindustani’ diary is displayed, with jottings in Urdu.
She appealed to Abdul: “Speak to me in Hindustani, speak slowly, that I may understand it as I wish to learn.”
The moment she died on January 21, 1901, Abdul was kicked out from his grace and favour home and deported to India. All the letters she had written to him were also burned.
What unfolds is the tale of how India became “the jewel in the crown” after control of India was taken away from the East India Company after the Indian uprising of 1857. Although Victoria became Empress of India in 1876, “her interest and involvement with India began years before”.
In 1842, she said: “Natives and coloured races should be treated with every kindness and affection as brothers not – as alas! Englishmen too often do – as totally different to ourselves, fit only to be crushed and shot down!”
In 1856 she wrote, “I always feel sorry for those poor deposed Indian Princes.”
“However, she was happy to wear the Kohinoor diamond... This fabulous jewel was once worn by Maharaja Ranjit Singh, who created the Sikh Empire,” a caption points out.
“The brutal deaths of 100,000 Indian and 11,000 British people during the rebellion changed the way India was governed,” visitors learn. “Until that point India was controlled by the privately owned East India Company. After their failure to rule, power in India was
transferred to the Crown.
“From that moment, Victoria sought out as much information as she could about India. She commissioned photographers and artists to record the country.
“Victoria wrote requesting information from anyone she knew in India as she did not want to rely on biased reports from the government. Most importantly, the letters she received from Indian royalty and personal encounters with Maharajah Duleep Sing led to a total fascination with India.”
ACTOR Raj Ghatak praised the enduring appeal of The Producers as he takes on a role in the hit Broadway show, now playing in the West End.
Ghatak is the first person of colour to portray Carmen Ghia, the flamboyant partner of eccentric director Roger DeBris (Trevor Ashley) and, consequently, his character is dressed in the south Asian attire of sherwani (tunic) and kurta pyjama.
In an interview with Eastern Eye, he said, “The world was arguably a happier place when it was first written.
“But what we’re finding now is that audiences are so grateful to laugh. They sit down, immerse themselves in the story, and forget everything else. That’s the power of theatre.”
Describing the show as a kind of “therapy” for modern times, Ghatak said, “Audiences tell us how welcome it is to laugh so hard again”.
It is the first major London revival of American filmmaker and actor Mel Brooks’ classic, which earned an unprecedented 12 Tony Awards, and has transferred from a sold-out run at the Menier Chocolate Factory to the Garrick Theatre.
Based on Brooks’ 1967 cult film, the story follows two desperate Broadway producers who scheme to get rich by producing a flop, only for their plan to go hilariously wrong.
Trevor Ashley as Roger DeBris and Ghatak as Carmen Ghia in The Producers
Teeming with Brooks’ signature wit, the show delights in its irreverence, sending up everything from show business to politics. Ghatak said, “It’s massively exciting to be part of it. And this time around, they’ve leaned in to my ethnicity. I wear a kurta pajama and a sherwani – things that have obviously never been done before. It gives us visibility.”
Two decades ago, Ghatak starred in Bombay Dreams, AR Rahman’s West End musical produced by Andrew Lloyd Webber, that became a cultural turning point for British Asian performers.
Ghatak recalled how the show “broke the glass ceiling for south Asian actors”.
He said, “At the time, it was just a job – a very high-profile one. But, years later, people tell me they were taken to see that show as children, and because of it, they felt they had permission to be an actor. That’s something that was never the case in my day.”
That generational shift is something Ghatak takes pride in. “When I look back, it feels like we’ve come a long way. But we still have a long way to go.”
Being part of The Producers brought Ghatak face to face with one of his heroes. Brooks himself, now 99, had to approve his casting.
The actor said, “They filmed my meeting. I met the team on a Friday afternoon, and on Monday morning they said, ‘Pending Mel Brooks’ approval, we’d like to offer you the role.’ I remember thinking, if I don’t get his approval, does this mean I can’t do the job?”
The cast had four weeks of full-time rehearsals. “For that production, I watched both films,” Ghatak said, referring to the 1967 original and the 2005 version with Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick.
“I wanted to understand the source material. I’m a firm believer that if it’s not broke, don’t fix it. Otherwise, you’re changing something for the sake of it. But rehearsals are where you experiment and play.” He credited both Brooks’ writing and Patrick Marber’s direction for the show’s humour.
“Our director comes from a background of plays. My own background is in plays, TV and film. So, we both approached this with the idea that, however heightened the situation or character, it must be grounded in truth,” he said.
Ghatak trained at the Royal Central School of Speech and Drama and Queen Mary University in London and has worked with Emma Thompson, Nicole Kidman, Riz Ahmed, Sir Derek Jacobi, Ewan M c G r e - g o r, Hugh Jackman and Benedict Cumberbatch. His stage credits include The Kite Runner, Life of Pi, Everybody’s Talking About Jamie and The Father and the Assassin. He has worked with some of the most respected directors in theatre, including Dominic Cooke, Indhu Rubasingham, Rufus Norris, Kerry Michael and now Marber.
Despite his achievements, the actor is conscious of the ongoing struggles for representation. He said, “As much as the situation has improved, we’ve still got a long way to go. Roles that challenge me, excite me. There are so many stories from the Asian subcontinent and diaspora that deserve to be told.
“When I started, there were very few people I could look to as role models. That’s why I’ve become such a champion for diversity and inclusion.”
Born and raised in north London to Bengali parents from Kolkata, he grew up surrounded by music and culture.
“My father was a doctor, and my mother was a chemistry teacher,” Ghatak said, adding, “But there was always music at home. My father sings Rabindra Sangeet, my mother plays guitar, and my sister is a classical singer.” Initially, he didn’t see acting as a viable career. “I went to a very academic school.
My interests were split between medical sciences and the performing arts.”
Eventually, he followed his childhood passion and trained as an actor.
He said, “A show like The Producers challenges me in a different way - it makes me laugh and it makes me think. That’s what keeps me passionate about the work.”
Asked what continues to excite him about musical theatre, Ghatak said, “Being in this show and telling this story. The comedy, the chaos, the craft… it’s such a joy. And to be the only person of colour among the six principal cast members, representing our community on such a stage, that’s something I’m proud of.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.