Police prepare for immigration protests in Essex this weekend
Essex chief constable Ben-Julian Harrington said demonstrations had been advertised for Saturday and Sunday following protests in recent days that led to charges of violent disorder.
Police officers guard the Britannia International Hotel in Canary Wharf during a demonstration on July 23, 2025 in London. (Photo: Getty Images)
Vivek Mishra works as an Assistant Editor with Eastern Eye and has over 13 years of experience in journalism. His areas of interest include politics, international affairs, current events, and sports. With a background in newsroom operations and editorial planning, he has reported and edited stories on major national and global developments.
POLICE will deploy hundreds of officers this weekend in response to planned immigration-related protests in Epping, northeast of London, amid concerns about possible rioting, Essex’s police chief said on Wednesday.
Essex chief constable Ben-Julian Harrington said demonstrations had been advertised for Saturday and Sunday following protests in recent days that led to charges of violent disorder.
"We'll have a robust policing operation. Essex is safe. You will have hundreds of officers on duty," Harrington said at a press conference.
The protests have taken place outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, located around 20 miles north of London, where asylum seekers are being housed.
Five men have been charged with violent disorder following incidents over the past week. Police said 10 people had been arrested in connection with the protests, during which vehicles were damaged and projectiles were thrown, injuring eight officers.
The police response comes in the wake of unrest last summer involving far-right supporters. The rioting followed false social media claims that the suspect in the murder of three girls was a radical Islamist migrant. The anniversary of the murders in Southport is on July 29.
Harrington said Essex Police’s priority was to protect communities while ensuring the right to peaceful protest.
The Bell Hotel in Epping has become a focal point for both anti-immigration protesters and pro-immigration groups after an Ethiopian asylum seeker living there was charged with sexual assault, harassment and inciting a girl to engage in sexual activity. The man denies the charges, according to a BBC report.
The BBC said the man had arrived in the UK by boat from northern Europe eight days before the alleged incident on July 7 and is currently in custody.
Prime minister Keir Starmer has committed to stopping small boat arrivals but has faced challenges in doing so. Official data released earlier this month showed that nearly 20,000 asylum seekers arrived in the UK on small boats in the first half of the year, the highest number recorded for that period.
The commemoration event honoured two South Asian WW2 veterans who died this year, Havildar Major Rajindar Singh Dhatt MBE and Sergeant Mohammad Hussain.
TWO South Asian Second World War veterans were honoured at a commemoration event in London on Wednesday, September 10. The ceremony paid tribute to Havildar Major Rajindar Singh Dhatt MBE and Sergeant Mohammad Hussain, who both died this year.
The event, hosted by British Future and Eastern Eye with support from the Royal British Legion, also launched My Family Legacy, a project to raise awareness of South Asian contributions in the world wars and preserve family stories for future generations.
More than 2.5 million people from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka served in the Second World War, forming the largest volunteer army in history. New polling by Focaldata, released alongside the launch, found that only half of the UK public – and fewer than six in ten British Asians – know that Indian soldiers served in the war.
Sunder Katwala, Director of British Future, said: “We should never forget what we all owe to those who won the second world war against fascism. South Asian soldiers were the largest volunteer army in history. Ensuring that their enormous contribution is fully recognised in our national story remains important work in progress. My Family Legacy aims to help people to find, document and tell these family stories of courage and contribution, service and sacrifice in the world wars.”
Gail Walters, Director of Network Engagement at the Royal British Legion, said: “Honouring the South Asian soldiers who served in Britain’s World Wars is about remembering their bravery and also gives a fuller picture of our shared history. The service and sacrifice of South Asian soldiers are integral to Britain’s national story and helped build the country we are today.”
Amrit Kaur Dhatt, granddaughter of Havildar Major Dhatt, said: “It is so important to capture stories of Commonwealth and ethnic minority soldiers, like my grandfather’s, because they were left out of mainstream history. I find that even the disparity and awareness between VE and VJ Day remains shockingly significant. But remembering isn’t just about the past. It is about shaping the future. And I fear that today’s society clearly hasn’t learnt enough from history. Baba Ji had always hoped that future generations would never have to see the devastation that they [war veterans] had to endure.”
Ejaz Hussain, granddaughter of Sergeant Hussain, said: “As the last soldiers of the war fade before our eyes, it remains imperative that we capture their stories. We - as a country and a people - are blessed to be here today, enjoying liberty and safety directly because of the sacrifices of those from the greatest generation, of which my grandfather was one.”
Journalist Sangita Myska said: “Honouring the service given by South Asian soldiers is vital to understanding the intertwined and complex relationship forged by our forebears with Britain.”
Actor Adil Ray OBE said: “This is the greatest war story that’s never been told. Millions of Muslims, Hindus and Sikhs from India, today’s Pakistan and Bangladesh fought two world wars, fighting for our freedom. We owe everything to Major Dhatt and Sergeant Hussain and their fellow soldiers. Their history is our history.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Mandelson, 71, a veteran Labour politician and key figure in the party under former leader Tony Blair, had come under scrutiny after letters and emails to Epstein were published. (Photo: Getty Images)
PETER MANDELSON, the UK's ambassador to the United States, has been sacked over revelations about his friendship with the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the government said.
"The Prime Minister has asked the Foreign Secretary to withdraw him as ambassador," a foreign ministry statement said, adding that new messages showed "the depth and extent of Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein".
Mandelson, 71, a veteran Labour politician and key figure in the party under former leader Tony Blair, had come under scrutiny after letters and emails to Epstein were published.
A birthday book included a letter purportedly from Mandelson describing Epstein as "my best pal". Further emails showed Mandelson advised Epstein to fight for early release when he faced charges over soliciting a minor.
"In light of the additional information in emails written by Peter Mandelson, the prime minister has asked the foreign secretary to withdraw him as ambassador," the foreign ministry said. "The emails show that the depth and extent of Peter Mandelson's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein is materially different from that known at the time of his appointment."
The ministry added that Mandelson's suggestion that Epstein's first conviction was wrongful and should be challenged was "new information."
On Wednesday, Mandelson said he deeply regretted ever meeting Epstein and that he had carried on that association "for far longer than I should have done". Starmer later gave him his backing in parliament.
HOME SECRETARY Shabana Mahmood is under pressure to immediately enforce stricter immigration rules as large numbers of migrants approach the point at which they can settle permanently in Britain.
Government figures revealed that from next year about 270,000 migrants will qualify for indefinite leave to remain (ILR), the legal right to stay in the UK. The number is expected to rise sharply, reaching more than 600,000 by 2028, reported the Times.
The so-called “Boriswave” of migration followed the introduction of former prime minister Boris Johnson’s post-Brexit immigration system in 2021. After travel slowed during the pandemic, net migration rose to record levels, peaking at 906,000 in 2023. Last year 172,798 people were granted ILR, the highest number since 2010.
Chris Philp, the Conservative shadow home secretary, said the government must act now. “Over the next two or three years, very large numbers who came in 2021, 2022 and 2023 are all going to become eligible for ILR,” he told the Times. “The government should immediately extend the qualifying period for ILR to ten years, including people who are here already. ILR should also only be given to people who are making an economic contribution. Those who are not should be required to go home.”
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch admitted her party “got it wrong” under Johnson by allowing record migration levels and promised that the Conservatives would push for tighter rules than Labour.
But others argue that fairness must be shown to migrants who came under the existing system and paid high visa and health surcharge fees in expectation of settlement after five years.
Marley Morris, head of immigration at the Institute for Public Policy Research, said the government should avoid applying the new rules retrospectively. “It seems only fair that the ten-year waiting period should only apply to new arrivals,” Morris was quoted as saying. “This reflects a core British principle that policies should not apply backwards.”
The issue is particularly sensitive for more than 180,000 Hongkongers who arrived in the UK under the British National (Overseas) visa route after China imposed its national security law.
MPs from Labour and the Liberal Democrats have warned that changing the rules midway would betray commitments made to those families and risk giving propaganda victories to Beijing.
David Pinto-Duschinsky, Labour MP for Hendon, said many BNO holders were planning their futures in Britain. “They are absolutely committed to our country for the long term,” he said. “When they applied in 2021, it was on the basis of a five-year ILR period. Extending that now will create great uncertainty and hardship.”
Madeleine Sumption of the University of Oxford’s Migration Observatory noted that while not all temporary visa holders will stay, “we expect a large increase in settlement applications over the next few years” because many are extending their stays.
Meanwhile, migration across the Channel continues. On Tuesday (9), a woman died after a dinghy got into difficulty, with more than 200 people making the crossing that day. The total for this year has already passed 30,300.
THE head of the police inspectorate has said that non-crime hate incidents should be scrapped, arguing that officers must draw a clear line between what is offensive and what is criminal.
Sir Andy Cooke, His Majesty’s Chief Inspector of Constabulary, made the comments as he released his annual report on the state of policing in England and Wales. He said that while much of the public expect officers to tackle serious crime and anti-social behaviour, too much time is being spent on matters that do not amount to criminality.
“Police still need to get the basics right and focus on the issues that matter to the public,” Sir Andy said. “I think we need to separate the offensive from the criminal. We need, at times, to allow people to speak openly without the fear that their opinions will put them on the wrong side of the law.”
More than 130,000 such incidents have been recorded in England and Wales, and while they do not appear on criminal records, they can show up on enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service checks.
Critics say the system has a chilling effect on free speech. In one case, officers recorded an incident when someone refused to shake another person’s hand in a gender identity dispute. In another, a doctor was spoken to after allegedly misdiagnosing a patient.
The issue has gained fresh attention following the arrest of comedy writer Graham Linehan, who was detained by armed officers last week over online comments.
Sir Andy described the action as “heavy handed” and warned it risked damaging public confidence. “Police officers should always use common sense … was it a great public optic? No, it wasn’t,” he said. “Lessons will be learned but it makes the policing job harder when these things occur.”
He added that while much offensive material circulates online, the police should only be concerned with tackling threats and genuine criminality. “I’m a firm believer that non-crime hate incidents are no longer required, and that intelligence can be gathered in a different way which causes less concern to the public and is easier for policing,” he was quoted as saying.
Sir Mark Rowley, commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, backed Sir Andy’s view. He said successive governments had failed to provide clear rules on dealing with social media posts, leaving officers “between a rock and a hard place”. He added: “We think we need more flexibility … and I agree that non-crime hate incidents should no longer be recorded.”
Sir Andy’s report also highlighted that although forces have made improvements over the past year, public trust remains low. He urged the government to fully fund its “safer streets” mission, which aims to cut knife crime and reduce violence against women and girls.
“This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to start the reform policing needs,” he said. “It will be a missed opportunity if it is not properly funded from the start.”
Keep ReadingShow less
The Office for Students welcomed the move, saying more universities may look at mergers as many face financial difficulties. (Photo credit: University of Kent)
THE UNIVERSITIES of Kent and Greenwich will merge in 2026 to form the UK’s first regional “super-university”.
The new institution, to be called the London and South East University Group, will have one vice-chancellor and around 50,000 students, the BBC reported.
The Office for Students welcomed the move, saying more universities may look at mergers as many face financial difficulties.
According to reports, 40 per cent of English universities are now in deficit. The University and College Union (UCU) warned the merger would “almost certainly” lead to redundancies. UCU general secretary Jo Grady said it was “a takeover by Greenwich” as Kent was “on the brink of insolvency”.
The Department for Education said ministers “welcome innovative approaches such as this one”. Kent’s interim leader Prof Georgina Randsley de Moura will stay in post until the merger, when Greenwich vice-chancellor Prof Jane Harrington will lead the new university.
Both universities said the merger would strengthen finances. Prof Harrington told BBC: “This is about taking the best of both universities and saying what do we want to offer to our communities.”
Students will continue applying to Kent or Greenwich separately, and degrees will retain the universities’ names. Both institutions said there were no immediate job loss plans, though each has recently made cuts.
The merger will cover campuses in Canterbury, Medway, Greenwich and Avery Hill. The OfS said it would ensure students’ studies are not disrupted.