HOW SELF-INDULGENT FILMS, NEPOTISM, AND BAD WRITING ARE KILLING AN INDUSTRY
LONG-TERM readers of Eastern Eye will know that the newspaper publishes a big Bollywood-led film preview at the beginning of each year, but in 2022 it didn’t happen because the overall quality of forthcoming Hindi cinema releases is just so terrible.
In fact, they are collectively so poor that it wouldn’t be credible to write a preview with glowing recommendations for each film. After a terrible decade of self-indulgent releases, ageing heroes, nepotism, poor new talent and bad screenplays, the industry has hit rock bottom. Instead of raising their game, those involved in Bollywood are collectively killing an industry with a long and proud tradition.
This has resulted in audiences turning their backs on Hindi films in a big way and regional language films becoming much bigger successes. To put it into perspective, newly released Telugu blockbuster RRR movie did more business in just its opening weekend than Bollywood’s four biggest releases of 2022 so far, Badhaai Do, Gangubai Kathiawadi, Jhund and Bachchhan Paandey, will collectively do in their entire run. 83’ had a lucrative Christmas release date, received rave reviews, and was based on India’s number one passion cricket, but was still a huge box office disaster.
Bachchhan Paandey
Although producers would point to the pandemic, the truth is that the big regional languages releases are regularly outperforming Bollywood in a big way, with Telugu films doing particularly well. That will likely happen again this month with Tamil film Beast and Kannada language blockbuster K.G.F: Chapter 2.
Satyameva Jayate 2
Instead of making a positive change, Bollywood will carry on following a dreadful blueprint that has resulted in so many truly awful movies like recent disasters Bhuj: The Pride Of India, Radhe: Your Most Wanted Bhai, Satyameva Jayate 2 and Bunty Aur Babli 2.
The knock-on effect has been audiences getting pushed away and turning well reviewed films like Jhund into box office flops. The poor quality can further be illustrated with the huge number of films not deemed good enough for cinemas and dumped straight onto streaming sites.
This once exciting industry running out of ideas is evident with so many sub-standard remakes on the way and a continuing reliance on cringe-worthy cover versions for songs.
Radhe: Your Most Wanted Bhai
The dire creative quality, lack of young talent and plummeting audiences at cinemas has turned this into the worst era for Hindi cinema in its entire history and there are six reasons why the industry has come to this low point.
Firstly, writing is perhaps the most important aspect of a film, but massively disvalued in Bollywood. More money is spent on outfits, nice locations, and flashy accessories than on coming up with a good story, which has been apparent in so many recent films, where style is put ahead of actual substance.
Bunty Aur Babli 2
Secondly, nepotism has become a cancer that keeps damaging the industry more and more with each passing year, which means flop stars and failures with family (or industry) connections prevent new talent from emerging.
Thirdly, lead stars have gained too much power, which means more focus is put on giving many of them screen time and nice outfits, ahead of a cohesive storyline that makes sense, and this has also led to ageing heroes embarrassing themselves by romancing leading ladies young enough to be their daughter. Fourthly, the untimely death of Sushant Singh Rajput has led to audiences turning their backs on Hindi cinema and it is something that cannot be ignored.
Since he passed away in 2020, boycott Bollywood has been the most popular Hindi cinema trend on Twitter.
The fifth thing that is harming Bollywood is wealthy streaming sites like Netflix, Hotstar and Amazon buying any rubbish that is being made. In the past, poor box office figures would force producers to raise their game and weed out bad ones, but today they know these streaming sites will buy the most unbelievably bad content, even if it has been rejected by cinema audiences. This gives them a greenlight to produce bad films. Although the same producers see streaming sites as a safety net, the long-term damage will be immeasurable.
Finally, a fake bubble is creating a false reality that is crushing Bollywood.
This is in the form of fake social media followers, fake positive reviews, fake YouTube views and fake news that includes exaggerated box office returns. Having so much fakery is like a house being on fire and pretending it isn’t by closing your eyes.
So, what can be done? Investing more in writing, allowing new young talent to come in from the outside, streaming sites raising their standards and taking power away from some big stars is a strong starting point, but that is far from happening.
There are a few glimmers of hope in the form of some stunning low budget story-driven movies, talents like Ayushmann Khurrana attempting new subjects and master filmmakers like Rajkumar Hirani, but that isn’t enough. There needs to be a dramatic change, or this generation will be the ones that killed a Hindi cinema industry with such a proud, rich history.
US president Donald Trump gestures next to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu at Ben Gurion International Airport as Trump leaves Israel en route to Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, to attend a world leaders' summit on ending the Gaza war, amid a US-brokered prisoner-hostage swap and ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas, in Lod, Israel, October 13, 2025.
‘They make a desert and call it peace’, wrote the Roman historian Tacitus. That was an early exercise, back in AD 96, of trying to walk in somebody else’s shoes. The historian was himself the son-in-law of the Roman Governor of Britain, yet he here imagined the rousing speech of a Caledonian chieftain to give voice to the opposition to that imperial conquest.
Nearly two thousand years later, US president Donald Trump this week headed to Sharm-El-Sheikh in the desert, to join the Egyptian, Turkish and Qatari mediators of the Gaza ceasefire. Twenty more world leaders, including prime minister Sir Keir Starmer and president Emmanuel Macron of France turned up too to witness this ceremonial declaration of peace in Gaza.
This ceasefire brings relief after two years of devastating pain. Tens of thousands of civilians have been killed. More of the Israeli hostages taken by Hamas are returning dead than alive. Eighty-five per cent of Gaza is rubble. Each of the twenty steps of the proposed peace plan may prove rocky. The state of Palestine has more recognition - in principle - than ever before across the international community, but it may be a long road to that taking practical form. Israel continues to oppose a Palestinian state.
The ceasefire will be welcomed in Britain for humanitarian relief and rekindling hopes of a path to a political settlement. It offers an opportunity to take stock on the fissures of the last two years on community relations here in Britain too. That was the theme of a powerful cross-faith conversation last week, convened by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, to reciprocate the expressions of solidarity received from Muslims, Christians and others after the Manchester synagogue attacks, and challenge the arson attack on a Sussex mosque.
Jewish and Muslim civic voices had convened an ‘optimistic alliance’ to keep conversations going when there seemed ever less to be optimistic about. The emerging news from Gaza was seen as a hopeful basis to deepen conversation in Britain about how tackling the causes of both antisemitism and anti-Muslim prejudice could form part of a shared commitment to cohesion.
This conflict has not seen a Brexit-style polarisation down the middle of British society. Most people’s first instinct was to avoid choosing a side in this conflict. The murderous Hamas attack on Jews on October 7, 2023 and the excesses of the Israeli assault on Gaza piled tragedy upon tragedy. The instinct to not take sides can be an expression of mutual empathy, but is not always so noble. It can reflect confusion and exhaustion with this seemingly intractable conflict. A tendency to look away and change the subject can frustrate those whose family heritage, faith solidarity or commitments to Zionism and Palestine as political ideas make them feel more closely connected.
Others have felt this conflict thrust upon them in an unwelcome way - including British Jews fed up with the antisemitic idea that they can be held responsible at school, university or work for what the government of Israel is doing. Protesters for Palestine perceive double standards in arguments about free speech - as do those with contrasting views. The proper boundaries between legitimate political protest and prejudice are sharply contested.
Hamit Coksun is an asylum seeker who speaks somewhat broken English. He would seem an unusual ally for Robert Jenrick. Yet the shadow justice secretary went to court to offer solidarity, after Coskun had burned a Qu’ran outside the Turkish Embassy, while shouting “F__ Islam” and “Islam is the religion of terrorism”. He had been fined £250, but the appeal court overturned his conviction. The judgment was context-specific: this specific incendiary protest took place outside an embassy, not a place of worship, in an empty street, and did not direct the comments at anybody in particular.
The law does not protect faiths from criticism, and indeed offers some protection for intolerant and prejudiced political speech too, though the police can place conditions on protest to protect people from abuse, intimidation or harassment on the basis of their faith.
So it can be legal to performatively burn books - holy or otherwise - though this verdict makes clear it does not offer a green light to do so in every context.
But how far should we celebrate those who choose to burn books? Cosun advocates banning the Qu’ran, making him a flawed champion of free speech. Jenrick is legitimately concerned to show that there are no laws against blasphemy in Britain, but could anybody imagine that he would turn up in person to show solidarity to a man burning the Bible, Bhagvad Gita or Torah, shouting profanities to declaring religion of war or genocide? The court’s defence of the right to shock, offend and provoke is correct in law. Those are hardly the only conversations that a shared society needs.
Sunder Katwalawww.easterneye.biz
Sunder Katwala is the director of thinktank British Future and the author of the book How to Be a Patriot: The must-read book on British national identity and immigration.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.