Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Court allows Georgia 'heartbeat' abortion ban to take effect

About half of U.S. states have or are expected to seek to ban or curtail abortions following the Supreme Court’s June 24 ruling.

Court allows Georgia 'heartbeat' abortion ban to take effect

A Georgia law banning abortion when a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically around six weeks, will take effect after a federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected a challenge to it by abortion providers.

Chief Judge William Pryor of the Atlanta-based 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote for a unanimous three-judge panel that the state had a "rational basis" for the law, given its interest in "providing full legal recognition to an unborn child."


Georgia passed the law, which also defines "person" to include an "unborn child," in 2019. A federal judge blocked it that October before it could take effect, finding it violated the right to abortion established by the U.S. Supreme Court in its 1973 landmark Roe v. Wade ruling.

However, the Supreme Court last month overturned that ruling, clearing the way for Wednesday's decision.

The law took effect after the 11th Circuit, in an unusual move, issued a separate order about two hours after its decision staying the trial court’s injunction.

"This is a grave human rights violation, and Planned Parenthood, along with its partners, will do everything in our power to fight back and ensure all people can get the health care they need, regardless of where they live," Alexis McGill Johnson, president of Planned Parenthood, one of the providers in the lawsuit, said in a statement.

The office of Georgia Attorney General Christopher Carr did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

About half of U.S. states have or are expected to seek to ban or curtail abortions following the Supreme Court's June 24 ruling. Judges have largely upheld the laws against legal challenges, though some, including in Utah and Kentucky, have been blocked for now.

The Georgia law includes exceptions for medical emergencies, and for cases of rape or incest where a police report was filed.

(Reuters)

More For You

britain-judiciary-freedom-of-information

FILE PHOTO: Senior members of the British Judiciary walk from Westminster Abbey to Westminster Hall in central London, 02 October 2006

(Photo credit should read JOHN D MCHUGH/AFP via Getty Images)

Eastern Eye journalist threatened by judiciary for doing his job

THE body which appoints judges (JAC) has tried to bully an award-winning Eastern Eye journalist by threatening him with a £14,270.70 costs bill, following a dispute over freedom of information requests.

Since 2020, Barnie Choudhury has written 23 articles for Eastern Eye, which include investigations into racism, bullying, misogyny and judicial secrecy that have led to policy changes within the judiciary.

Keep ReadingShow less