Gayathri Kallukaran is a Junior Journalist with Eastern Eye. She has a Master’s degree in Journalism and Mass Communication from St. Paul’s College, Bengaluru, and brings over five years of experience in content creation, including two years in digital journalism. She covers stories across culture, lifestyle, travel, health, and technology, with a creative yet fact-driven approach to reporting. Known for her sensitivity towards human interest narratives, Gayathri’s storytelling often aims to inform, inspire, and empower. Her journey began as a layout designer and reporter for her college’s daily newsletter, where she also contributed short films and editorial features. Since then, she has worked with platforms like FWD Media, Pepper Content, and Petrons.com, where several of her interviews and features have gained spotlight recognition. Fluent in English, Malayalam, Tamil, and Hindi, she writes in English and Malayalam, continuing to explore inclusive, people-focused storytelling in the digital space.
Ryland Headley, 92, was convicted in 2023 for the 1967 rape and murder of Louisa Dunne.
Modern DNA testing on preserved evidence led to the breakthrough.
Headley previously admitted to raping two elderly women and committing multiple burglaries.
Police are now working with the NCA and other forces to investigate further possible crimes.
Officers describe him as a “dangerous serial offender” whose full history may still be unknown.
Ryland Headley, a 92-year-old man convicted of a 1967 murder following a cold case breakthrough, is now the subject of wider police investigations. Detectives believe he may be responsible for further unsolved crimes, with similarities in method and victim profile suggesting a disturbing pattern. Headley was convicted of raping and murdering 75-year-old Louisa Dunne in Bristol after DNA evidence linked him to the scene more than five decades later. Avon and Somerset Police are now working with the National Crime Agency and other forces to pursue additional leads.
Cold case solved with modern forensics
The murder of Louisa Dunne in June 1967 shocked the Easton community in Bristol. Despite an extensive investigation, no suspect was identified at the time. It wasn’t until a cold case review in 2023 that investigators made a breakthrough.
Forensic teams re-examined the skirt Mrs Dunne had been wearing, discovering that semen remained on the fabric. When tested with modern DNA profiling, it returned a match to Ryland Headley. His DNA had only been entered into the national database in 2012 following an unrelated arrest.
Police believe this could be the oldest cold case murder ever solved in the UK.
History of offences raises new questions
Ryland Headley was no stranger to law enforcement. In the late 1970s, he admitted to raping two elderly women in Ipswich, aged 84 and 79, and asked for 10 burglaries to be considered during sentencing. In each case, his victims were elderly or middle-aged women living alone.
Although these crimes were not initially linked to Mrs Dunne’s death, police now say the pattern was “eerily similar”.
Detective Inspector Dave Marchant, from the major crime review team, said: “It was eerily similar – the method of entry, the offences that these women were subjected to and the demographic. I would describe him as a serial offender and a dangerous serial offender at that.”
Further offences under review
With Headley now convicted, police have widened their investigation. Avon and Somerset Police are collaborating with the National Crime Agency and other UK forces to identify whether other cold cases could be connected to him.
“We are working with colleagues across the country to try to uncover any other offences we can potentially bring him to justice for,” DI Marchant said.
Heidi Miller, regional forensic coordinator, questioned whether Mrs Dunne’s murder was Headley’s first serious offence. “Such a brutal crime is not usually a first offence,” she said. “I wonder, what else has he been involved in through the years?”
Outward appearance masked true nature
Despite his past, Headley was considered by neighbours to be a gentle and friendly figure in later life. Known for chatting about gardening and his pet cat, few suspected the crimes he had committed decades earlier.
DI Marchant cautioned against being deceived by appearances: “Some people are capable of the most disgusting, abhorrent things and can still present an outward appearance of normality – and that’s the case with Mr Ryland Headley.”
Headley is due to be sentenced at Bristol Crown Court for the rape and murder of Louisa Dunne.
FTC secures largest-ever settlement with Amazon over Prime subscription practices
Around 35 million customers could be eligible for refunds
Automatic repayments capped at £41 per person, with claims process to follow
Why Amazon is paying out
Amazon will refund millions of Prime members following a £2 billion settlement with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The regulator accused the company of using “subscription traps” to push customers into signing up for Prime and then making it difficult for them to cancel.
The case concluded a two-year investigation and represents the FTC’s largest settlement on record. It is also the second-highest refund award in US history.
Who qualifies for a refund
The FTC said that anyone in the United States who signed up for Prime, or tried unsuccessfully to cancel, between 23 June 2019 and 23 June 2025 may be eligible. Around 35 million people are thought to have been affected.
How much customers will get back
Refunds will be limited to the total Prime membership fees paid, capped at £41.
Customers who enrolled through Amazon’s “challenged” sign-up flows, such as the Universal Prime page, the shipping option page, Prime Video or single-page checkout, will receive automatic refunds if they used no more than three Prime benefits in their first year.
Further claims can be made by those who enrolled unintentionally or struggled to cancel. These payments will also be capped at £41.
If there is not enough money left in the settlement to cover all claims, refunds will be issued on a pro rata basis. This means many customers will receive less than the maximum refund.
How to claim a refund
Amazon will begin issuing automatic refunds within 90 days of the FTC order. A separate claims website will then be launched, with links available on Amazon.com and within the Prime section of its app.
Eligible customers will be notified by email and post once automatic payments are completed. They will then have 180 days to submit a claim online, by email or by prepaid post.
Amazon’s response
Amazon has rejected the regulator’s findings, saying it has always complied with the law.
In a statement, the company said: “We work incredibly hard to make it clear and simple for customers to both sign up or cancel their Prime membership, and to offer substantial value for our many millions of loyal Prime members around the world.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
A 21-year-old transgender woman has been convicted of sexual assault in northeast England.
Ciara Watkin did not disclose her gender status before engaging in sexual activity with a male partner.
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said the man could not give informed consent.
Watkin was found guilty on three charges at Teesside Crown Court.
Sentencing is scheduled for 10 October.
A transgender woman has been convicted of sexually assaulting a male partner after failing to disclose her gender status before sexual activity. Prosecutors argued that the man could not give informed consent, and the case has been described as having a significant impact on his mental wellbeing.
The case
Ciara Watkin, 21, from Stockton-on-Tees, met the man, also 21, on Snapchat in June 2022. She later engaged in sexual activity with him without revealing her gender status. During their first encounter, she told him she was on her period and could not be touched below the waist.
A few days later, they met again, after which Watkin blocked contact before later messaging him to disclose that she was transgender and had male genitalia.
Prosecution statement
Senior Crown Prosecutor Sarah Nelson said: “It is clear from the evidence in this case that, prior to engaging in sexual activity with the victim, Watkin had made no attempt to inform him of her transgender status. The victim has made clear in police interview that he would not have engaged in sexual activity had he known that Watkin was transgender and, consequently, these events have had a significant impact on his mental wellbeing.”
Defence argument
Watkin admitted lying about her gender status but denied wrongdoing. Her lawyers argued in court that it would have been “blindingly obvious” to the man that she was not biologically female, according to the BBC.
Verdict and sentencing
Following a trial at Teesside Crown Court, Watkin was convicted of two charges of sexual assault and one charge of assault by penetration. She will be sentenced on 10 October.
Keep ReadingShow less
The Rhode Island judge whose compassionate rulings made him a viral sensation
US judge and TV star Frank Caprio has died at the age of 88.
He was best known for his compassionate courtroom style on Caught in Providence.
Clips of his judgements went viral, earning billions of views online.
His family confirmed his death following a battle with pancreatic cancer.
Judge remembered for kindness and humour
Frank Caprio, the Rhode Island judge whose compassionate rulings made him a viral sensation, has died aged 88. His family confirmed he passed away following a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer.
Caprio, often described as the “nicest judge in the world”, presided over cases in Providence for more than 40 years before finding global fame on the hit television show Caught in Providence.
Viral fame through Caught in Providence
The courtroom series showcased Caprio’s trademark mix of empathy, humour and common sense. He often took into account the personal circumstances of defendants, creating memorable moments that resonated worldwide.
Clips of his rulings — from inviting children to sit with him on the bench to unveiling a “mini-judge” soft toy — racked up billions of views across TikTok, Instagram and YouTube. One short video of his morning routine alone was viewed more than five million times.
In a 2019 interview, Caprio said the programme offered “a slice of life of Rhode Island that is very interesting, and it reflects the same issues people are experiencing nationwide”.
Tributes and legacy
In a statement on his official Instagram account, where he had 3.4 million followers, Caprio was remembered for his “warmth, humour, and kindness” and for inspiring “countless acts of kindness”.
His son, David Caprio, thanked fans for their support and encouraged them to “spread a little kindness” in his father’s memory.
The show’s producers, Debmar-Mercury, paid tribute to his “unique brand of compassion and common sense approach”, adding: “We will miss him dearly.”
During its run, Caught in Providence was nominated for three Daytime Emmy Awards, with Caprio himself earning two nominations last year.
Personal life
Frank Caprio is survived by his wife of nearly 60 years, Joyce, as well as five children, seven grandchildren and two great-grandchildren.
He announced his cancer diagnosis in 2023, saying he was “fully prepared to fight as hard as I can”. In one of his final posts, he told followers he had returned to hospital after a setback in treatment, asking for their prayers.
Rapper Sean Kingston sentenced to three and a half years in US federal prison.
Fraud scheme, run with his mother, involved luxury goods worth more than £740,000.
Items included designer watches, furniture, a 232-inch LED TV and a bulletproof Cadillac Escalade.
Kingston apologised in court; his mother was jailed for five years in July.
Text messages showed the pair discussing fake payment receipts.
Conviction and sentencing
Rapper Sean Kingston has been sentenced to three and a half years in a US federal prison for his role in a fraud scheme worth over £740,000.
The Jamaican-American singer, whose real name is Kisean Anderson, was convicted earlier this year alongside his mother, Janice Turner, of wire fraud. Prosecutors said they exploited Kingston’s celebrity status to obtain luxury items without paying for them.
How the scheme worked
According to prosecutors, Kingston contacted victims via social media, claiming he wished to buy high-end products. He then invited them to his homes in South Florida, promising to promote their goods on his platforms or introduce them to other celebrities.
When payments were due, Kingston or his mother sent fraudulent wire transfer receipts. While some victims later received compensation after legal intervention or lawsuits, most were left out of pocket.
Evidence at trial
Prosecutors said the scheme netted more than £740,000 in goods, including luxury watches, furniture, a 232-inch LED television and a bulletproof Cadillac Escalade.
Text messages shown in court revealed Kingston instructing his mother: “I told you to make [a] fake receipt.”
Apology and defence
Before sentencing, Kingston apologised to the court and said he had learned from his actions. He will begin serving his sentence immediately.
His mother, Janice Turner, was jailed for five years in July.
Defence lawyer Zeljka Bozanic described Kingston as “a soft guy who grew up poor when he rose to fame overnight”, arguing he still had the mentality of a teenager and struggled to manage his finances.
Keep ReadingShow less
How Sydney Sweeney’s silent ad campaign became a Republican rally cry
Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad sparked backlash over a “genes/jeans” pun
Critics accused it of echoing eugenics and white supremacist rhetoric
Public records revealed Sweeney is a registered Republican
Donald Trump praised her and attacked Taylor Swift in the same post
American Eagle stock soared as the ad became a right-wing rallying point
Let’s be honest: no one expected a jeans ad to spiral into this. Not Sydney Sweeney, not American Eagle, and definitely not the internet and yet, here we are.
It started with a dumb pun. It exploded into a cultural war. Now it’s a headline-grabbing mess involving eugenics, Republicans, and Donald Trump shouting into Truth Social. Somehow, a 27-year-old actress became the poster girl for a movement she hasn’t even acknowledged.
Here’s how it all unravelled.
The controversial American Eagle ad featuring Sydney Sweeney in head-to-toe denim Instagram/americaneagle
1. The ad: A pun so bad, it started a fire
On 23 July, American Eagle dropped a denim ad with Sydney Sweeney, best known for Euphoria and The White Lotus. In the clip, she says:
“Genes are passed down from parents... My jeans are blue.”
It was supposed to be cheeky. It ended up setting X and TikTok on fire. Critics accused the ad of echoing white supremacist rhetoric, especially with a blue-eyed, blonde actress talking about “genes.” The line between “playful” and “problematic” blurred, fast. The internet saw something way darker and it was just getting started.
People didn’t hold back. Users called the ad tone-deaf, dog-whistling, and straight-up “eugenics-coded.” Words like “Aryan” and “racial superiority” were trending. Even though it was likely just a bad pun from an overconfident marketing team, the optics were bad. Really bad.
It reeked of eugenics (that vile, discredited pseudo-science about "superior" genetics). "Literal Nazi propaganda," some screamed. "Tone-deaf!" "Promoting racial superiority!"
Others scratched their heads: "It's just jeans, people! Lighten up!" Too late. The fuse was lit. The internet doesn’t do nuance.
3. The plot twist: Then, her political registration leaked
Soon after the outrage, someone dug up public records showing Sweeney registered as a Republican in Florida, just a month after Donald Trump’s criminal conviction.
This revived an earlier controversy. Remember 2022? Photos surfaced from her mum's party with guests wearing "Make Sixty Great Again" hats (a MAGA parody). Sweeney pleaded then: "Stop making assumptions... an innocent celebration."
With her Republican registration now public, assumptions came flooding back, and this time, they stuck.
Now? Crickets. Total, deafening silence from Sweeney.
Sydney Sweeney’s American Eagle ad sparked backlash over a “genes/jeans” punInstagram/americaneagle
4. Enter Trump: "She's HOT! (And Republican!)"
On 3 August, a reporter told Trump about Sweeney’s political affiliation while he was boarding Air Force One. He lit up:
“She’s a Republican? Oh, now I love her ad!”
Two days later, he took to Truth Social with a post praising her, saying "Sydney Sweeney, a registered Republican, has the 'HOTTEST' ad out there... Go get 'em Sydney!" and claimed American Eagle jeans were “flying off the shelves.”
He misspelled her name as “Sidney.” He didn’t correct it. He didn’t need to. He’d made his point.
— (@)
5. Trump's double tap: Slamming Swift & "woke losers"
In the same post, Trump lashed out at Taylor Swift, again:
“I HATE her... She was booed out of the Super Bowl and is NO LONGER HOT.”
(Spoiler: She wasn’t booed, and she’s still doing just fine.)
He then blamed Jaguar and Bud Light for going “woke” and declared that being Republican is now “what you want to be.” Sweeney wasn't just selling jeans anymore; Trump drafted her as the star recruit in his anti-woke army.
Donald Trump praised her and attacked Taylor Swift in the same postX Screengrab/Pop Base
6. JD Vance and right-wing media pile on
US Vice President JD Vance joined the conversation, calling Sweeney an “All-American girl” and mocking liberals for “calling everyone who finds her attractive a Nazi.”
Conservative media roared. This wasn't about an ad anymore; it was a glorious battle against "cancel culture" lunacy. Sweeney, silent as a stone, was now their accidental poster child. The narrative was simple: look at how crazy the left is, cancelling a girl for selling jeans.
— (@)
7. American Eagle held its ground and made a profit
Instead of apologising, American Eagle stood by the ad:
"Sydney Sweeney Has Great Jeans is and always was about the jeans. Her jeans. Her story... Great jeans look good on everyone."
AE's stock price skyrocketed over 20%. They doubled down on inclusivity, and ironically, the controversy gave them a boost. The value? 10 or 20 times the ad spend! Marketing experts said the viral attention (good or bad) paid off tenfold.
No statement. No apology. No clapback. Just silence.
Which is smart, maybe. Or maybe it’s avoidance. Either way, people are filling in the blanks for her. Some see her as a symbol of resistance. Others see her as complicit. The truth? Only she knows. But in today’s world, silence often becomes its own kind of answer.
As one blunt PR expert warned: "She’s a bombshell, but she’s not box office yet... It’ll be carnage."
— (@)
9. Career-wise, this could go either way
Sweeney’s team probably hoped this would blow over. But Trump’s full-throated endorsement has ensured it won’t.
PR experts say this level of politicisation can hurt, especially for someone still building their star power. As a strategist put it: “She’s not Margot Robbie yet. This could backfire.”
She’s now a trending name, yes, but not for her work. That’s a dangerous spot to be in for an actor with ambition.
Sydney Sweeney’s ad started as a joke — now it’s a political firestormGetty Images
10. The real story isn’t about jeans
This isn’t about denim anymore. Or even Sydney Sweeney, really.
It’s about how a single sentence in a fashion ad cracked open every fault line in American pop culture, race, beauty standards, cancel culture, and politics. And how public figures get swept into battles they didn’t sign up for.
One poorly written pun turned into a culture war grenade. And Sweeney? She’s now stuck in the blast radius, like it or not.
— (@)
So... what was this really about?
Let's be brutally honest. That ad was clumsy. The "genes" bit with Sweeney's look? Yeah, it was tone-deaf at best, grossly insensitive at worst. It deserved criticism. But what happened next? That wasn't about the ad. It was about the hunger for a fight.
Sydney Sweeney probably just wanted to sell jeans. What she ended up selling, unintentionally, was a case study in how fame works now. You don’t need to say anything controversial. The internet will do it for you. Then Trump might repost it. Next, you're a symbol. Then you're a controversy.
And just like that, “great jeans” became a political statement, one pair of blue jeans at a time.