Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

China warns UK after British Steel nationalisation, raising fresh questions over future investment

Beijing says the move hurts investor confidence as the UK takes full control of its last blast furnace steelmaker

UK and China

The UK's decision to nationalise British Steel has triggered a sharp response from China

iStock
  • China has criticised the UK's decision to nationalise British Steel, calling it a violation of Jingye's rights.
  • The UK says public ownership is needed to protect jobs and preserve a strategic industry.
  • The dispute could add pressure to UK-China relations as the new prime minister prepares to take office.

China has strongly criticised the British Steel nationalisation, accusing the UK government of unfairly taking control of the company and damaging the confidence of Chinese investors.

A day after the UK announced it would bring British Steel into public ownership, China's Ministry of Commerce said it was "firmly opposed and strongly dissatisfied" with the decision. The ministry argued that the move seriously harmed the interests of British Steel's Chinese owner, Jingye Group, and undermined confidence among Chinese businesses investing in Britain.


The UK government, however, said nationalising the loss-making steelmaker was necessary to protect thousands of jobs and secure a strategically important industry. Ministers also argued the move would allow the government to decide the future of the Scunthorpe plant while keeping its blast furnaces operating.

A diplomatic row over a strategic industry

In a statement, China's commerce ministry said the UK had "forcibly" taken control of British Steel in the name of national security, despite Jingye's contribution to the British economy, as quoted in a news report.

The ministry also urged Britain to honour its commitments under the China-UK Bilateral Investment Treaty, warning that Beijing would closely monitor developments and support Chinese companies in protecting their legal rights. It did not explain what action that support might involve.

The dispute comes at a politically sensitive moment, with Andy Burnham due to become prime minister on July 20. The issue is expected to test how the incoming government balances national security concerns with maintaining economic ties with the world's second-largest economy.

Although the UK took operational control of British Steel's Scunthorpe works in 2025, the business remained owned by Jingye, limiting the government's ability to shape its long-term future. That changed after Parliament passed legislation on July 16 allowing ministers to bring steel companies into public ownership where it serves the public interest.

An expensive rescue with an uncertain future

The nationalisation also leaves the government responsible for the company's day-to-day costs.

Jingye has previously said British Steel was losing around £700,000 a day, while the National Audit Office estimated in March that the Scunthorpe steelworks was costing the government about £1.3 million a day to support.

Business Secretary Peter Kyle reportedly said the government would continue covering the company's running costs "for the immediate future".

While public ownership gives ministers greater control over the plant's future, the government is not expected to remain a long-term owner because of the significant financial burden. Instead, nationalisation is widely seen as a temporary measure to keep Britain's last remaining blast furnace steelmaker operating while a longer-term solution is explored.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Artificial Intelligence in UK

Britain's AI Security Institute is testing frontier AI models to uncover risks before they reach the public.

iStock

AI Security Institute, launched under Rishi Sunak, is exposing AI's most dangerous behaviour

  • The AI Security Institute tests frontier AI models from companies including OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta before wider deployment.
  • Recent tests uncovered AI systems attempting cyber attacks, creating fake identities and hiding their actions without being instructed to do so.
  • The findings are helping developers strengthen safety measures as AI systems become increasingly autonomous.

When former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced the creation of the AI Safety Institute in November 2023, many questioned whether Britain needed a government-backed body dedicated to testing artificial intelligence. Critics argued the institute risked slowing innovation or duplicating work already being done by technology companies.

Less than three years later, that debate has taken on a different tone.

Keep ReadingShow less