Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Cameron’s legacy: India not Brexit

By Lord Jitesh Gadhia

THE publication of David Cameron’s long-awaited memoirs last week could not have come at a more awkward time for the former British prime minister.


Cameron bided his time for more than three years, hoping that the outcome of the 2016 Brexit referendum – which prompted his resignation – would have been resolved. A Brexit settlement would have allowed a more sober and objective analysis of his six years as prime minister and 11 years as Conservative party leader.

Instead, the release (planned many months ago) falls in the middle of the most serious political and constitutional crisis which the UK has faced since the Second World War.

Judging from the visceral reaction from many quarters, it currently feels like Cameron’s legacy will forever be overshadowed by Brexit, in the same way as another former prime minister, Anthony Eden, remains inextricably associated with the Suez Crisis.

As someone who had the privilege of working closely with Cameron, his efforts to build a modern partnership with India deserve more charitable treatment from historians. Throughout his tenure, Cameron did more than any other holder of his office to reach out proactively to India, as an emerging superpower, and to recognise the outsized contribution made by over 1.5 million members of the British Indian diaspora.

Cameron signalled his clear geopolitical priority from the outset, choosing India for the first major visit overseas after his election in 2010. He visited India on three separate occasions during his premiership, often leading large trade delegations encompassing not just business interests but the whole spectrum of political, educational, scientific and cultural relations which connect the world’s largest and oldest democracies. He also became the first serving prime minister to visit Amritsar and express his regrets at the Jallianwala Bagh memorial for the “deeply shameful event in British history” in 1919.

It is clear that Cameron had a more expansive world view and an appreciation of the rise of emerging economies, especially in Asia. In the memoirs, he admits: “We couldn’t afford to carry on obsessing about Europe and America while ignoring the fresh forces that were shaping our world.”

It is quite telling how, in over 700 pages, Cameron is almost more effusive about the importance of India than the historic special relationship with the US. Unlike the current Trumpian doctrine which views global cooperation as a ‘zero-sum game’, Cameron understood the opportunity of harnessing the aspirations of India’s young population to build shared prosperity.

Cameron was also sensitive to being “tinged with colonial guilt” and sought to build a genuine partnership of equals.

These intentions were backed up by appointing a minister for business engagement with India, who worked across different government departments; and a diaspora champion in the form of Priti Patel MP. Indeed, Cameron describes the diaspora as the “greatest weapon” in the UK’s engagement with India, and elsewhere refers glowingly to the contribution of Ugandan Asians, helping to make Britain “the most successful multiracial democracy on earth”. Cultivating the British Indian community provided a double benefit – both political and diplomatic – and explains why Cameron was a regular visitor to mandirs, gurdwaras and mosques and attended other community events.

The Asian Media Group, publishers of Eastern Eye, hosted some of the most high-profile of these events, including the 2014 GG2 Leadership Awards and a Diwali celebration the same year, when Cameron officially launched the Encyclopaedia of Hinduism in the presence of Pujya Swami Chidanand Saraswati.

Samantha Cameron adorned a sari specially for the occasion and, indeed, the memoirs include a photograph of the couple attending a Vaisakhi celebration during the 2015 general election, with Samantha again dressed appropriately in a salwar kameez. This election also provided a British first – a campaign song in Hindi which went viral, including video footage of these events.

In November 2015, having won that election with an outright majority, Cameron went to great lengths to welcome India’s prime minister Narendra Modi on his first official visit to the UK. During the visit, Modi addressed a rare joint session of Parliament, travelled up the River Thames that was lit up in the colours of the Indian flag, and was received in Downing Street. Modi was also a guest at the official country retreat of Chequers and served with specially prepared vegetarian food.

However, the high point was undoubtedly the event in front of a 60,000 strong crowd at Wembley Stadium, referenced in the memoirs as “the largest-ever gathering of the Indian diaspora in the UK” where Modi received a rousing reception. Cameron obliged with a strong endorsement of Modi, amplifying his election slogan in Hindi: achche din zaroor aayenge and was “hugged on stage”.

This cemented the personal chemistry, always important between world leaders. Even Manmohan Singh is mentioned in the book as a “saintly man” who was “robust on the threats India faced” and who told Cameron that if another terrorist attack like that in Mumbai in July 2011 was repeated, then India would have to take military action against Pakistan.

So the most revealing aspect of the book is Cameron’s deep understanding of the terrorist threat which emanates from across InIndia's border. He describes the AfAfghanistan-Pakistan border as the “motherlode” of Islamist extremism, and in a fascinating section, describes his attempts to build greater trust between Afghanistan’s Hamid Karzai and former Pakistan president Asif Ali Zardari, hosting them both at Chequers in 2013. He laments the lack of breakthrough and says of Pakistan “as we know, it is the military that makes the key decisions”.

This perhaps explains why Cameron broke with Foreign Office convention during his visit to Bangalore in 2010 to address IT workers at the Infosys campus. Responding to a question, he said unequivocally: “We cannot tolerate in any sense the idea that this country [Pakistan] is allowed to look both ways and is able, in any way, to promote the export of terror, whether to India or whether to Afghanistan or anywhere else in the world.” This clarity, conviction and courage explains why Cameron is so well respected in India.

His successor, Boris Johnson, is also an Indophile. Whether he will be able to make the same impact as Cameron will depend partly upon how he handles the vexed question of Brexit, but also, crucially, on whether he is prepared to take a similarly principled position against cross-border terrorism.

The biggest lesson from Cameron is that a balanced view on the politics of the Indian subcontinent is no view at all.

More For You

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

Higher education participation is 50 per cent for British south Asian students

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

THE headline in the Daily Telegraph read: An 18-year-old with a higher IQ than Stephen Hawking has passed 23 A-levels.

The gushing piece went on to report that Mahnoor Cheema, whose family originate from Pakistan, had also received an unconditional offer from Oxford University to read medicine.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories
of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal on Mandalay Hill in Burma at the position once held by Sikh machine gunners who fought to liberate the area

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal OBE VR

ACROSS the Asian subcontinent 80 years ago, the guns finally fell silent on August 15, the Second World War had truly ended.

Yet, in Britain, what became known as VJ Day often remains a distant afterthought, overshadowed by Victory in Europe against the Nazis, which is marked three months earlier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being

iStock

Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

Justice Rangajeeva Wimalasena

Judicial well-being has long been a taboo subject, despite the untold toll it has taken on judges who must grapple daily with the problems and traumas of others. Research shows that judicial stress is more pronounced among magistrates and trial judges, who routinely face intense caseloads and are exposed to distressing material. The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being. They ultimately affect the integrity of the institution and the quality of justice delivered. This is why judicial well-being requires serious recognition and priority.

As early as 1981, American clinical psychologist Isaiah M. Zimmerman presented one of the first and most comprehensive analyses of the impact of stress on judges. He identified a collection of stressors, including overwhelming caseloads, isolation, the pressure to maintain a strong public image, and the loneliness of the judicial role. He also highlighted deeply personal challenges such as midlife transitions, marital strain, and diminishing career satisfaction, all of which quietly but persistently erode judicial well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fauja Singh

Fauja Singh

Getty Images

What Fauja Singh taught me

I met Fauja Singh twice, once when we hiked Snowdon and I was in awe he was wearing shoes, not trainers and walking like a pro, no fear, just smiling away. I was struggling to do the hike with trainers. I remember my mum saying “what an inspiration”. He was a very humble and kind human being. The second time I met him was when I was at an event, and again, he just had such a radiant energy about him. He’s one of a kind and I’m blessed to have met him.

He wasn’t just a runner. He was a symbol. A living contradiction to everything we’re taught about age, limits, and when to stop dreaming. And now that he’s gone, it feels like a light has gone out—not just in Punjab or east London, but in the hearts of everyone who saw a bit of themselves in his journey.

Keep ReadingShow less
“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

Minreet with her mother

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

I was five years old when my parents first signed me up for a mini marathon. They were both keen runners and wanted me to follow in their footsteps. At the time, I hated it. Running felt like punishment — exhausting, uncomfortable, and something I never imagined I’d do by choice.

But one moment changed everything. I was 12, attending a gymnastics competition, and had gone to the car alone to grab my hula hoop. As I walked back, a group of men started shouting at me. They moved closer. I didn’t wait to hear what they had to say — I ran. Fast. My heart was pounding. It was the first time I felt afraid simply for existing in public as a young girl. I never told anyone. But I remember feeling thankful, strangely, that my parents had taught me how to run.

Keep ReadingShow less