Skip to content
Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Barry Gardiner: MPs must stand firm to prevent Britain crashing out of the EU

by BARRY GARDINER

Labour MP for Brent North and shadow international trade secretary


IT HAS been widely reported that when asked what he wanted to be when he grew up, a young Boris Johnson answered, “world king!”

It is less widely reported that when US president Donald Trump heard this story he simply asked, “But how could there be two of us?”

Last Saturday (1), as tens of thousands of ordinary citizens demonstrated opposite Downing Street in a packed Whitehall, my eyes kept flicking to a small balcony of Banqueting House where on January 30, 370 years ago, a previous “world king” had been executed. His crime? Proroguing parliament.

The chant last Saturday was “Stop the Coup”. And it was important that the very first speaker was a Brexiteer – a paid-up Leaver. His eloquent point was simply this: “I voted leave to bring back sovereignty to the British parliament, not to have that parliament silenced and sidelined by an unelected prime minister.”

No deal was not an option at the time of the referendum, and this prime minister has no mandate for a no-deal Brexit. And prorogation is simply a technical manoeuvre to prevent parliament legislating to ensure the government does not take the UK out of the EU without a deal.

Cabinet ministers, embarrassed by their previous dismissal of the very idea of prorogation, now try to claim this is really only an extended conference recess. But here is the difference – parliament can be recalled in the recess. In prorogation, it can’t. Prorogation normally lasts eight days. This one lasts five weeks.

In fact, the last time we had an extended prorogation was just before the 1997 general election when the Conservative prime minister, John Major, wanted to prevent parliament scrutinising the cash-for-questions scandal before the country went to the polls. Ironic then, that even he has now joined the legal challenge to the prime minister to stop prorogation.

This paper’s print deadline, as parliament meets on Tuesday (3), means that any prediction that you read here requires a very bold judgement call. But  what is clear is we are closer now to leaving the EU without a deal than ever before; the meeting last week by Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn shows that opposition party leaders are now united and resolute in their determination to legislate to avoid no deal; and proroguing parliament is an attempt to ensure that this cannot be done before the EU Summit on October 17-18.

This week we will find out whether there are sufficient MPs who – regardless of whether they wanted to leave or remain – are ready to stake their political career on saying that ‘leaving without a deal is unacceptable’.  Tremendous pressure is being put on Conservative MPs. They are told to vote with their party rather than for what they believe to be the interest of the country. In truth, their party no longer exists. It has been captured and turned into the right-wing Brexit Party.

If enough MPs hold firm and put the country first, then an act of parliament could be passed this week that would compel the government to prevent prorogation and rule out leaving without a deal.

At prorogation, all bills that have passed through parliament then receive royal assent and such an act would become binding upon the government. How extraordinary then, on the BBC’s The Andrew Marr Show last Sunday (1), to hear Lord chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, Michael Gove, refuse several times to accept that the government would implement such legislation.

This is a government that is shredding our constitutional norms and conventions. Were the opposition leader to have done this, one can scarcely imagine the media outrage. How different it seems is the response when this constitutional coup is perpetrated by a group of old Etonians!

Many suspect that the government is trying to precipitate a general election, an election which they will try to frame as the people versus parliament. But the demonstrations in Whitehall and up and down the country have shown that the real struggle is between an unelected prime minister and the people of Britain who still believe in democracy and parliamentary sovereignty.

More For You

UK riots

Last summer’s riots demonstrated how misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric, ignited by a tiny minority of extremists, can lead to violence on our streets

Getty Images

‘Events in 2024 have shown that social cohesion cannot be an afterthought’

THE past year was marked by significant global events, and the death and devastation in Ukraine, the Middle East and Sudan – with diplomatic efforts failing to achieve peace – have tested our values.

The involvement of major powers in proxy wars and rising social and economic inequalities have deepened divisions and prolonged suffering, with many losing belief in humanity. The rapid social and political shifts – home and abroad – will continue to challenge our values and resilience in 2025 and beyond.

Keep ReadingShow less
Singh and Carter were empathic
leaders as well as great humanists’

File photograph of former US president Jimmy Carter with Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh in New Delhi, on October 27, 2006

Singh and Carter were empathic leaders as well as great humanists’

Dinesh Sharma

THE world lost two remarkable leaders last month – the 13th prime minister of India, Dr Manmohan Singh, (September 26, 1932-December 26, 2024).and the 39th president of the US, Jimmy Carter (October 1, 1924-December 29, 2024).

We are all mourning their loss in our hearts and minds. Certainly, those of us who still see the world through John Lennon’s rose-coloured glasses will know this marks the end of an era in global politics. Imagine all the people; /Livin’ life in peace; /You may say I’m a dreamer; / But I’m not the only one; /I hope someday you’ll join us;/ And the world will be as one (Imagine, John Lennon, 1971) Both Singh and Carter were authentic leaders and great humanists. While Carter was left of Singh in policy, they were both liberals – Singh was a centrist technocrat with policies that uplifted the poor. They were good and decent human beings, because they upheld a view of human nature that is essentially good, civil, and always thinking of others even in the middle of bitter political rivalries, qualities we need in leaders today as our world seems increasingly fractious, self-absorbed and devolving. Experts claim authentic leadership is driven by:

Keep ReadingShow less
Why this was the year of governing anxiously

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer at the state opening of parliament in July after Labour won the general elections by a landslide

Why this was the year of governing anxiously

THIS year was literally one of two halves in the British government.

Rishi Sunak and Sir Keir Starmer each had six months in Downing Street, give or take a handful of days in July. Yet this was the year of governing anxiously.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’
Supporters of the ‘Not Dead Yet’ campaign outside parliament last Friday (29) in London

‘Debate over assisted dying raises risks for medical staff’

Dr Raj Persaud

AFTER five hours of debate over assisted dying, a historic private members’ bill passed its second reading in the House of Commons. This is a stunning change in the way we as a nation consider ending our lives.

We know from survey research that the religious tend to be against assisted dying. Given Asians in the UK tend to be more religious, comparatively, it is likely that Asians in general are less supportive of this new proposed legislation, compared to the general public.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’
Kanishka Narayan (centre) with fellow visiting British MPs, Rajasthan chief minister Bhajan Lal Sharma (left) and other officials

‘It’s time for UK-India ties to focus on a joint growth story’

Kanishka Narayan

FOUR months since my election to parliament, I had the opportunity to join my parliamentary colleagues on a delegation to India, visiting Delhi and Jaipur for conversations with our Indian counterparts, business leaders and academics.

I went to make the case for Indian investment in my constituency and across the UK.

Keep ReadingShow less