Pramod Thomas is a senior correspondent with Asian Media Group since 2020, bringing 19 years of journalism experience across business, politics, sports, communities, and international relations. His career spans both traditional and digital media platforms, with eight years specifically focused on digital journalism. This blend of experience positions him well to navigate the evolving media landscape and deliver content across various formats. He has worked with national and international media organisations, giving him a broad perspective on global news trends and reporting standards.
BANGLADESH's ousted and self-exiled prime minister Sheikh Hasina was sentenced to six months in prison by the country's International Crimes Tribunal on Wednesday (2) in a contempt of court case, a top prosecutor said.
Hasina has been facing multiple cases since she fled to India after deadly student-led protests in August, but it was the first time the former leader was sentenced in one of them.
Shakil Akand Bulbul, a leader of the Awami League party's banned student wing Chhatra League, was also sentenced to two months in prison in the same case, chief prosecutor Muhammad Tajul Islam told reporters. The party had been led by Hasina for years.
A three-member ICT tribunal, led by Justice Golam Mortuza Mozumder, delivered the verdict in their absence, noting that the sentences will take effect upon arrest or surrender, the prosecutor added.
The contempt charges stem from a leaked phone recording where Hasina was allegedly heard saying, "there are 227 cases against me, so I now have a licence to kill 227 people."
A forensic report by a government investigative agency later confirmed the audio's authenticity.
The ICT was originally set up in 2010 by Hasina's own government to try 1971 war crimes.
Bangladesh's interim administration, led by Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, pledged to hold leaders, including Hasina, accountable for rights abuses and corruption, including the crackdown on the student-led uprising last July that toppled Hasina's regime.
The tribunal has so far issued three arrest warrants for Hasina, including charges of crimes against humanity linked to the July violence. Hasina's Awami League party remains banned while trials continue against the party and its former leaders.
Up to 1,400 people were killed between July and August last year, according to the United Nations, when Hasina's government ordered a crackdown on protesters in a failed bid to cling to power.
In a separate ongoing trial that began on June 1, prosecutors say that Hasina held overall command responsibility for the violence.
Her state-appointed defence lawyer said she has denied the multiple charges that amount to crimes against humanity under Bangladeshi law.
Supporters of Hasina dismiss the charges as politically motivated, but the interim government insists the trials are crucial for restoring accountability and rebuilding trust in Bangladesh's democratic institutions.
Protesters gather outside the Royal Courts of Justice in central London on October 13, 2025, as The High Court decides in a three-month trial whether systems installed in Mercedes, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan diesel vehicles were designed to cheat clean air laws. (Photo: Getty Images)
A MAJOR trial involving five global carmakers opened at London’s High Court on Monday, nearly ten years after the Volkswagen emissions scandal exposed the use of software designed to cheat pollution tests.
The court will determine in a three-month hearing whether systems installed in diesel vehicles made by Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan were designed to cheat clean air laws. The five manufacturers are accused of using illegal “defeat devices” that made cars appear less polluting during testing than they were on the road.
The case, one of the largest mass lawsuits in English legal history, involves 1.6 million motorists suing 14 carmakers, including Jaguar Land Rover, Toyota, Vauxhall-Opel and BMW. The current trial focuses on five lead defendants and is expected to set a precedent for other manufacturers, potentially paving the way for billions of pounds in compensation.
Martyn Day, lawyer at Leigh Day representing the claimants, said the case impacts “nearly all the manufacturers in this country.” He told AFP, “It is a huge case for the British public,” adding that it could lead to “serious amounts of compensation.”
Lawyers for the claimants say the devices detected when vehicles were being tested and ensured emissions were kept within legal limits, but did not do so in normal driving conditions. The five manufacturers deny the allegations and say their systems were legally and technically justified.
Mercedes and Ford have rejected the claims as having “no merit,” while Nissan declined to comment. French carmakers Renault and Stellantis, which owns Peugeot and Citroen, said their vehicles complied with regulations in place at the time.
The High Court’s decision will be binding on hundreds of thousands of similar claims against other manufacturers, including Vauxhall/Opel and BMW. Any damages the court might rule should be paid will be decided at a further trial next year.
Adam Kamenetzky, one of the claimants, said he felt “defrauded” after buying a Mercedes SUV in 2018 believing it was less polluting than other models. “We live in a built-up neighbourhood in London where there are children with lungs that can be harmed immeasurably by the emissions that these cars are producing,” he told AFP.
The dieselgate scandal first broke in 2015 when Volkswagen admitted fitting millions of vehicles with software to make engines appear less polluting in tests. The case triggered investigations and lawsuits against several major carmakers worldwide.
In 2020, the High Court found Volkswagen had used defeat devices to cheat emissions tests. The company settled the case in 2022, paying £193 million ($259 million) to 91,000 British motorists without admitting liability. Globally, Volkswagen has paid more than 32 billion euros ($37 billion) in fines, vehicle refits, and legal costs.
The latest group of claims in the UK, covering 14 manufacturers, is far larger than the VW case. Claimants’ lawyers have previously estimated the litigation’s total value at around £6 billion.
Courts and regulators around the world have since pursued investigations into diesel emissions. In July, a Dutch court ruled that diesel cars sold by Stellantis brands Opel, Peugeot-Citroen and DS contained defeat devices, a decision Stellantis said was wrong. Automakers have also faced fines and settlements in the United States and elsewhere.
Day said, “The vehicles looked less polluting during the testing, but as soon as you were outside the testing regime, those emission levels went massively up.”
The current UK trial will decide whether the carmakers are liable before any compensation phase begins next year.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.