Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Article 370: After Imran Khan's war threat, Pakistan foreign minister says war not an option

Pakistan foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi said war is not an option to deal with the Kashmir issue amidst fresh India-Pakistan tensions over New Delhi revoking Jammu and Kashmir's special status.

His remarks came at a time when Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan has been repeatedly threatening the possibility of a nuclear war with India over Kashmir after his efforts to internationalise the matter failed to gain any traction.


Asserting that abrogation of Article 370 was its internal matter, India has strongly criticised Pakistan for making "irresponsible statements" and provocative anti-India rhetoric over issues internal to it.

In an interview to BBC Urdu published on Saturday, Qureshi said Pakistan never followed an aggressive policy and always preferred peace, adding that the current government of Pakistan has repeatedly offered India to start talks because the two nuclear armed neighbours cannot take the risk of going on a war.

War was not option to deal with the issue of Kashmir, the Pakistani foreign minister emphasised.

He reiterated that Kashmir is an international issue and not just a bilateral affair between Pakistan and India.

Tensions between India and Pakistan spiked after India abrogated provisions of Article 370 of the Constitution to revoke Jammu and Kashmir's special status and bifurcated it into two union territories.

In an opinion piece in The New York Times on Thursday, prime minister Khan again warned that if the world does nothing to stop India's decision on Kashmir, the two nuclear-armed countries will get ever closer to a "direct military confrontation".

Khan said when he was elected prime minister last August, one of his foremost priorities was to work for lasting and just peace in South Asia.

But he says that all his efforts to start a dialogue for peace were rebuffed by India.

India has not been engaging with Pakistan since an attack on the Air Force base at Pathankot in January of 2016 by Pakistan-based terrorists, maintaining that talks and terror cannot go together.

Earlier this year, tensions flared up between India and Pakistan after a suicide bomber of Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Muhammed killed 40 CRPF personnel in Kashmir's Pulwama district on February 14.

Amid mounting outrage, the Indian Air Force carried out a counter-terror operation, hitting the biggest JeM training camp in Balakot, deep inside Pakistan on February 26.

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Andy-Burnham-Makerfield

Dale Vince says Labour should rethink how it funds Britain's transition to net zero.

REUTERS/Temilade Adelaja

Top Labour donor urges Andy Burnham to ditch ‘net zero’ label and rethink green spending

  • Major Labour donor Dale Vince has called for a shake-up of the UK's net zero strategy, arguing billions of pounds could be redirected to other priorities.
  • Vince wants the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero scrapped, with climate policy returning to the Treasury and the Department for Business and Trade.
  • The government insists net zero is creating jobs, attracting investment and strengthening Britain's energy security.

The UK's net zero strategy has become the centre of a fresh political debate after one of Labour's biggest donors called for a major overhaul of how the government pursues its climate goals. Rather than abandoning net zero, renewable energy entrepreneur Dale Vince has argued that Labour should change its approach, claiming several flagship green policies are placing an unnecessary burden on public finances during the cost of living crisis.

Vince, founder of renewable energy company Ecotricity and a long-time financial backer of Labour, reportedly said the party should drop the term "net zero" and dismantle the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero if Andy Burnham were to become Prime Minister in the future. He argued that responsibility for climate and energy policy should instead return to the Treasury and the Department for Business and Trade, similar to the previous Conservative government's structure.

Keep ReadingShow less