INDIA does not want to give any signal that it is protectionist, the top bureaucrat in the finance ministry said, after slashing import duties on high-end motorcycles, amid US president Donald Trump’s moves on tariffs.
Trump has ignited a trade war with sweeping tariffs on Canada, Mexico and China. None were aimed at India, although Trump had called it a tariff abuser during his election campaign last year.
“We don’t want to give anybody any signal that we would like to be protectionist,” finance secretary Tuhin Kanta Pandey said in an interview after the budget, unveiled last Saturday (1). “Our stance is that we don’t want to increase protection.”
Trade and immigration issues will take centrestage when prime minister Narendra Modi meets Trump next week.
India’s budget cut import tariff slabs, reducing average basic customs duties on scores of items such as raw materials for domestic industries like textiles and automobiles, Pandey added.
Average import tariffs on essential goods, mainly items of food and raw material, range from zero to five per cent, while those on capital goods range from 7.5 per cent to 10 per cent, with about 10 items in higher tax categories, he said.
Trade analysts were not convinced the cuts were sufficient, however.
“India’s average tariffs are still much higher compared to the United States, Japan and China,” said Ajay Srivastava, founder of Global Trade Research Initiative, a think tank based in Delhi.
While India was slashing peak rates of basic customs duties used for international comparisons, it was adding various surcharges on imports, implying that the total tax burden remained high, he said.
Scotland fears US tariffs on £1bn Scotch exports
India slashed custom duties on motorcycles, such as those from Harley-Davidson, with engine capacity of 1,600 cc or more, to 30 per cent from 50 per cent on fully-built imports in the budget, which Pandey said also cut average tariffs to 11 per cent from 13 per cent.
“We should give the right signal for the world, as well as to our own industry,” Pandey added, saying the tariff measures aimed at helping domestic companies initially, but would be phased out as those industries developed.
Trump’s administration also upped the ante by recently raising the issue of undocumented Indians living in the United States, a topic on which India’s foreign ministry has said it is in dialogue with US authorities.
A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said a C-17 aircraft had departed this week for India with migrants aboard but would not arrive for at least 24 hours. The Pentagon has started providing flights to deport more than 5,000 immigrants held by US authorities in El Paso, Texas, and San Diego, California.
In relation to the UK, Trump said although Britain was “out of line” when it came to trade he thought it may be able to avoid tariffs, adding of the imbalance: “I think that one can be worked out.”
A British government spokesperson said earlier on Monday the US was an indispensable ally and close trading partner.
“We have a fair and balanced trading relationship which benefits both sides of the Atlantic,” the spokesperson said. “We look forward to working closely with President Trump to continue to build on UK-US trading relations for our economy, businesses and the British people.”
However, Scotland’s export-focused whisky industry is concerned as the US remains the primary export market for Scotch whisky, accounting for £1 billion ($1.2bn) per year.
Donald Trump
Scotland’s whisky industry is well-acquainted with the toll of tariffs, having suffered a £600 million hit during Trump’s first term. Few spirits companies are talking aloud about the unpredictable US president’s policies.
Diageo, producer of Johnnie Walker whisky, scrapped on Tuesday (4) a key sales target over Trump’s tariff plans, but other giants Pernod-Ricard and William Grant have remained silent on the subject.
The industry’s lobby, the Scottish Whisky Association, has expressed only delight at the prospect of working with Trump.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said she’ll make the case to Trump that Scotch whisky should be spared from tariffs.
“Trump is very proud of his Scottish roots and Scotch whisky is obviously a really important part of the Scottish economy,” Reeves said in an interview at the recent World Economic Forum.
FUGITIVE businessman Nirav Modi, who has been in a UK prison for more than six years, has told a court there will be “sensational developments” when his extradition case to India resumes next month.
The 54-year-old appeared before High Court Judge Simon Tinkler at the Royal Courts of Justice in London on Friday in an unrelated civil case involving an unpaid loan of over USD 8 million to the Bank of India.
The judge rejected Modi’s request to delay the case on technical and medical grounds raised from prison. The matter is set to go to trial in January 2026.
“They (Bank of India) refer to my extradition… I'm still here. There will be some sensational developments, and I have never used these words before,” Modi said during a pre-trial review hearing.
Modi, wanted in India in connection with the estimated USD 2 billion Punjab National Bank fraud case, told the court he was “extremely hopeful” of being discharged or granted bail after the court agreed to consider new evidence despite what he called a “high bar”.
The UK’s Crown Prosecution Service confirmed that Modi “has lodged an application to reopen his (extradition) appeal”, with Indian authorities having already filed their response. The hearing is expected to take place towards the end of November.
Representing himself as a “litigant in person”, Modi read from handwritten notes as he addressed the judge. Prison officers stood nearby as he spoke about difficulties with his eyesight and delays in accessing a computer while in custody, which he said made the legal process unfair.
“I understand this is an adversarial process and they (Bank of India) can say anything against me. But they keep on making assumptions; I would say, spend one day in prison… there needs to be some basic common sense,” he said, appearing agitated during the hearing.
The Bank of India, represented by barrister Tom Beasley and RWK Goodman’s Milan Kapadia, is pursuing Modi’s personal guarantee related to a loan to Dubai-based Firestar Diamond FZE. They said that delaying the proceedings would be unfair as it would indefinitely postpone the bank’s claim.
“If he is extradited, he will likely remain in custody… He will also be in a different time zone,” Beasley told the court, adding that the bank “remains sceptical” about Modi’s “claimed lack of funds”.
Justice Tinkler ruled that maintaining the court timetable outweighed other factors and said that reasonable measures were being taken to ensure fairness in the case.
“It is clear that some (medical) issues do affect his ability to work and will, in all likelihood, affect his ability to participate in the trial without reasonable adjustments being made,” the judge said, referring to a confidential medical report.
He said the seven-day trial scheduled for January would allow enough time to accommodate Modi’s medical needs. The court was also informed that prison authorities would provide him with a computer within a week, and hard copies of legal documents would be sent before another pre-trial hearing in early December.
Modi’s in-person appearance followed a “production order” from the court, which led to logistical issues over his return to custody. He was moved from HMP Thameside in south London, where he has been held, to HMP Pentonville in north London.
The businessman requested that the court note his preference for a single cell, but the judge said this was beyond the court’s jurisdiction. However, the judge directed that all his papers be transferred with him or that he be returned to Thameside soon.
Modi has been in prison since his arrest in March 2019 and has repeatedly been denied bail on grounds that he poses a flight risk, most recently in May this year.
He faces three criminal cases in India: one by the Central Bureau of Investigation related to the PNB fraud, another by the Enforcement Directorate over alleged money laundering, and a third for alleged interference with witnesses and evidence.
In April 2021, then UK Home Secretary Priti Patel ordered his extradition after a prima facie case was established. Modi had exhausted all legal challenges until his recent application to reopen the appeal was accepted. The case is set to be heard next month.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.