Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

Sunrisers Leeds face backlash for signing Pakistan's Abrar Ahmed

Pakistan players have not played in the Indian Premier League (IPL) since 2009 due to diplomatic tensions between the two countries.

Abrar Ahmed

Pakistan's Abrar Ahmed celebrates after taking the wicket of Sri Lanka's Kamil Mishara during the 2026 T20 World Cup Super Eights match against Sri Lanka and Pakistan at the Pallekele International Cricket Stadium in Kandy on February 28, 2026.

Getty Images

SUNRISERS LEEDS have faced backlash on social media after the Indian-owned Hundred franchise signed Pakistan spinner Abrar Ahmed this week.

Relations between India and Pakistan mean the two teams only play each other in major global cricket tournaments.


Pakistan players have not played in the Indian Premier League (IPL) since 2009 due to diplomatic tensions between the two countries.

Before this week's inaugural Hundred auction in London, there had been speculation that Pakistan players could face a "shadow ban", with teams linked to IPL owners refusing to bid for them.

Four franchises in the competition — MI London, Manchester Super Giants, Sunrisers Leeds and Southern Brave — are at least part-owned by companies that control IPL teams.

However, Sunrisers Leeds signed Pakistan leg-spinner Abrar Ahmed for £190,000 ($252,000).

Usman Tariq was the only other Pakistan player bought in the auction. He was picked by American-backed Birmingham Phoenix.

In the women's auction on Wednesday, the only two Pakistan players available — Fatima Sana and Sadia Iqbal — went unsold.

Last month, the England and Wales Cricket Board issued a statement saying all eight city-based franchises in the 100-ball competition would select players based only on performance.

After the signing of Ahmed, Sunrisers Leeds faced criticism from some Indian cricket fans on social media.

The @SunrisersLeeds account on X was suspended overnight. It returned on Friday with a new follower base, but comments focused on Ahmed's signing.

The same issue appeared in the club's Instagram comments. It also spread to the accounts of Sunrisers Hyderabad, which is also owned by the Sun Group media conglomerate.

(With inputs from agencies)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Anti immigration protesters attend the 'Glasgow Reclaims The Streets From Far-right Hatred And Violence' anti-racism protest on June 13, 2026 in Glasgow, Scotland.

Getty Images

Tackling hostility against Muslims matters for everyone

Sunder Katwala

Born in the mid-1970s I felt part of a lucky generation, which gained from pushing back the overt racism of that era. When we talk about stronger “social norms”, what we mean is that few people thought that monkey chants at the football or racist jokes on the telly were normal anymore – while more had Asian and black colleagues, neighbours and friends.

That past progress is put to the test today. A terrible crime in Belfast saw organised efforts at indiscriminate racist attacks on migrants and ethnic minorities, whose only connection to the crime was the colour of their skin. Those seeking to make racism fashionable again have the online megaphone of the world’s richest man, Elon Musk, on their side.

Past progress could be experienced unevenly, too. Being of mixed Indian and Irish Catholic parentage, I saw both identities rise in status once the BBC comedy Goodness Gracious Me inverted who could tell the jokes, and peace broke out in Northern Ireland. Yet, British Muslims of my generation felt under more intense scrutiny after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

Efforts to tackle anti-Muslim hatred risked being stalled by arguments over what to call it and how to define it. The government’s new definition of anti-Muslim hostility seeks to transcend the confusion that the term “Islamophobia” could generate. But the challenge is not just to define the prejudice – but to find effective ways to shrink it.

There are sobering findings on the starting points in new research from British Future and the British Muslim Trust. More than half of British Muslims report experiencing prejudice based on their religion last year – a quarter in person and over a third online. A third of the public hold mostly negative views. One in six endorse sweeping and often indiscriminate hostility. Anti-Muslim hostility can have about twice the social reach as prejudice against other faith or ethnic minorities.

Tackling this hostility cannot be the responsibility of Muslims alone. It will take a whole-of-society effort. After all, this is foundationally about the attitudes towards a six per cent minority group, held among the 94 per cent of us who are not Muslim.

Keep ReadingShow less