The India-based transgender woman discusses her personal journey and her film I Am Sirat that has become a hot topic of conversation
By Asjad NazirDec 02, 2023
PERHAPS the most unique creative partnership of the year has seen Canadian Oscar-nominated director Deepa Mehta teaming up with India-based transgender woman Sirat Taneja.
They have collaborated on I Am Sirat, which has delighted audiences at major film festivals like London and Toronto. The acclaimed documentary film follows Delhi-based Sirat as she navigates a complex double life of living as a professional woman Sirat and being a dutiful son Aman at home for a widowed mother unwilling to accept her.
With the transgender debate being red-hot around the world, this is a timely film that has won hearts and reopened important discussions, including within the south Asian community, where it remains a taboo. The dynamic Delhi-set duel identity documentary shows less can be more as it was remarkably filmed on a phone camera.
Eastern Eye caught up with Sirat to discuss her personal journey and a simple film with a big heart that has become a hot topic of conversation. She spoke softly in Punjabi and peppered each answer with a smile.
What led you towards making the film I Am Sirat?
Taneja in the film
The reason for making this film was the hope that my mother and family would accept me. So, I made this film for acceptance, especially from my mother. She knows about my sexuality but hasn’t been accepting it. Through this film, she can see the journey I am on and what I am going through.
So hopefully, she understands that and accepts me.
How did you first meet acclaimed filmmaker Deepa Mehta?
I have known her for four-five years. We bonded instantly after I had shared my experiences with her.
That working relationship started with (Netflix series) Leila.
What has it been like working with her?
It has been a beautiful experience working with Deepa ma’am. That normal working relationship developed into a strong bond over the years. The relationship deepened and this film was born out of that. It was like working with family and I have felt that bond with her always.
What was the experience of making this movie after Deepa agreed to your idea of making it?
It was amazing and felt great. I didn’t know what to expect, but I am thankful for the experience. I didn’t realise that it would grow into something bigger like this, including being at major festivals like London, which has been very good for the film.
Did you have any worries about being part of such a revealing film?
I wasn’t scared at all because I took this step after a lot of thought. I weighed up all the positives and negatives carefully, before commencing work on this project, so I wasn’t fearful at all. Deepa also put my mind at rest.
Did you learn anything new while making this film?
(Laughs) The first thing I learned was how to properly hold and use my phone camera. I knew myself very well, so didn’t learn anything new in that respect. I was fully aware of my situation, and what I was doing. I wasn’t acting in the film, so didn’t need to learn that. It was all natural.
What else did this film teach you?
I have also learned on this journey that there are opportunities for transgender people like this film and they shouldn’t hide in the shadows – all of them should proudly come forward. I always understood what I wanted to say, and this film gave me a voice. I hope it gives others a voice too and makes them feel seen.
How much does the positive response mean to you?
(Smiles) I have never received so much love in my entire life.
The love I have got in Canada and London at the festivals has been especially overwhelming. A lot of people have taken the time to speak with me and share their own experiences, which means so much. Many said, ‘I wish you were my daughter’, which meant so much to me. I never imagined receiving so much love.
I have appreciated that a lot.
What is the key message of I Am Sirat?
The message of this film is acceptance above all. I just want to communicate that we too are human beings and should be accepted. We are not some separate animals. We have the same feelings, emotions, a heart and two hands as every human being. We should all be properly accepted in society and treated like everyone else. To families who have transgender children, I want to say, please properly understand and love your children.
How does it feel that this film is being selected for major festivals?
To be officially selected in major festivals like Toronto and London has been wonderful. I have liked the whole experience a lot. I am so very thankful to the organisers of the festivals for having faith in this film and for giving me an opportunity to tell my story.
Who are you hoping to connect with this film?
We are hoping that as many people as possible watch this film. Not just me, but also Deepa ma’am. This film is aimed at everyone. I hope this film enables people to understand me and those in my position. We hope this film promotes a positive debate. I hope they all pray that my mother finally, truly accepts me, and pray for all trans people in my position.
Sirat Taneja with Deepa Mehta
How important is this film?
This film is massively important to me because it allowed me to tell my story. I will always be thankful for that. It is also important for the wider society. Deepa ma’am and I may not be able to change someone’s thought with this film, but hope that this film enables people to understand the life of a transgender person. We have so many challenges, from family members to society as a whole and this film highlights that.
Has your family seen the film yet?
They haven’t seen it yet but know it has been made.
They think it’s a film about Aman, not Sirat.
I want them to see it and understand what I want, which is acceptance, and how much I am struggling in my life.
What has been the driving force during your journey with this film?
I think the inspiration has come from within.
Like I had said, I wasn’t getting acceptance from my family. I received a lot of emotional and physical abuse, including being beaten and thrown out of the house. I had fights with my mother and family. I could have carried on living my life like that but thought it was time to do something about it and fight back in my own way.
Did you think about the outcome of this film journey?
I thought if I was successful great but if not, I haven’t lost anything and it’s ok.
Thanks to Deepa ma’am, we are seeing success on international platforms.
I’m really pleased that my story is out there, and hope this film inspires everybody to fight for their rights.
Rachel Zegler plays Eva Perón in Jamie Lloyd’s radical Evita revival at the London Palladium.
A viral moment features Zegler singing live from the theatre’s balcony to crowds on the street.
Lloyd’s stripped-down staging amps up visuals and sound but sacrifices storytelling depth.
Talks are on for a Broadway transfer as early as 2026 with Zegler confirmed to reprise her role.
Rachel Zegler commands the London stage as Eva Perón in Jamie Lloyd’s daring reimagining of Evita, a production that trades subtlety for spectacle and could soon be heading to Broadway.
Following the success of Sunset Boulevard, Lloyd’s signature stripped-down style meets rock concert intensity in this revived version of the Andrew Lloyd Webber and Tim Rice musical. Zegler, in only her second major stage role, dazzles with commanding vocals and presence, even as critics debate the show’s dramatic clarity.
Jamie Lloyd’s Evita with Rachel Zegler set for Broadway after London triumphInstagram/officialevita
Zegler’s Evita performance leaves no doubt
From her first note, Rachel Zegler proves she’s no newcomer to the stage. Her performance, both vocally and physically, carries the entire show, even when the production leans more into visual punch than emotional depth. Zegler’s rendition of Don’t Cry for Me Argentina, performed from the Palladium’s real-life balcony to street crowds below, has already become the production’s signature moment. The scene is filmed live and broadcast inside, symbolically capturing Eva Perón’s manipulation of public adoration.
Staging pushes boundaries with video and spectacle
Jamie Lloyd’s direction strips the production down to a giant grey staircase and replaces traditional storytelling with flashing lights, camera close-ups, and muscular choreography. While critics say some scenes lose emotional resonance, especially in the second act, others land with undeniable theatrical force. Some note the live camera work, booming lighting, and thundering score often feel closer to a Beyoncé tour than traditional West End fare.
After drawing big names on opening night, from Pedro Pascal and Keanu Reeves to Elaine Paige, the show’s success has sparked conversations about a Broadway transfer. Lloyd, backed by Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber, is pushing for an early 2026 New York run. Logistics are already in motion, with plans to replicate the live balcony scene in the heart of Manhattan, pending city approval for crowd management.
Though visually electrifying, the production has drawn criticism for flattening the emotional arc of Eva Perón’s story. Supporting roles, including Diego Andres Rodriguez as Che and James Olivas as Juan Perón, offer committed performances, but critics say the narrative lacks clarity. Still, audiences have been captivated, and the show has crossed into public conversation beyond theatre circles, exactly the kind of impact Lloyd seems to be chasing.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
K Anis Ahmed’s new novel Carnivore is as imaginative as it is provocative
From the blood-soaked backstreets of Dhaka to the polished kitchens of Manhattan’s elite, K Anis Ahmed’s new novel Carnivore is as imaginative as it is provocative. A satirical thriller steeped in class tension, culinary obsession and primal survival, Carnivore follows Kash, a Bangladeshi immigrant-turned-chef who launches a high-end restaurant serving exotic meats – only to become embroiled in a sinister world of appetite and ambition.
But this is no simple tale of knives and recipes. Ahmed – a seasoned journalist, publisher, and president of PEN Bangladesh – brings a sharp eye to the grotesqueries of power and privilege. In this exclusive interview with Eastern Eye, he speaks about his passion for food, the moral murkiness of his characters, and why even the most ordinary people can spiral into extraordinary darkness.
A compelling premise, layered and unpredictable charactersAMG
What first connected you to writing?
I have been an avid reader since childhood – starting with Bengali and Russian fairy tales, before moving on to Enid Blyton and Agatha Christie. In my teens, I discovered Somerset Maugham and Graham Greene. Their travel writing sparked my imagination. The idea of being a wanderer through the world as a writer captivated me and pulled me toward writing as a vocation.
What inspired your new novel Carnivore?
I lived in New York for a time and love the city. I have always had a strong interest in food and found the idea of running a café, bar or restaurant quite enticing. Since I could not do it in real life, I created one in fiction – and let it go in some wild directions.
Tell us a little about the story.
It is about a young immigrant, Kash, who runs a wild game restaurant in downtown Manhattan. When the 2008 financial crash hits, his investors and clientele disappear. To stay afloat, he turns to hosting private dinners for the super-rich. In chasing a gig for a secretive billionaire’s dining club – while also dealing with a Russian money-lender – things soon spiral out of control.
What drew you to the culinary aspect?
It came from my passion for food and cooking. But cooking, for me, is more than just food – it is about identity, values and cultural expression.
As a writer, how do you develop the darker elements in a story like this?
It usually begins with a simple ‘what if’. I ask myself: how far could a seemingly ordinary person be pushed, given enough pressure or temptation? And who might they take down with them?
What inspired the title?
It was suggested by my brilliant agent, Charlie Campbell. The title captures not just the wild game theme, but also the broader idea of appetite – its excesses, its destructive potential.
Anyone who enjoys a gripping story with a diverse cast and unexpected twistsHarperFiction
What was the biggest challenge in writing the book?
Making the ultimate meal they plan feel believable – both to Kash and his team, and to the clients. None of these characters are inherently sociopathic. I wanted to explore the extremes that ordinary people might reach when driven by circumstance.
What is your favourite part of the book?
There is an episode where they go “hunting” for a peacock – I really enjoyed writing that. The backstory draws from my own memories of Eid-ul-Azha in Dhaka, where animal sacrifices take place in driveways and courtyards. It is surreal to see such rituals on such a scale in a modern city.
Who are you hoping the novel resonates with?
Anyone who enjoys a gripping story with a diverse cast and unexpected twists. It is for fans of crime thrillers, but also for general fiction readers who like discovering new subcultures – and morally daring propositions.
What do you enjoy reading, and do you have a favourite author?
I read a lot – both fiction and non-fiction, from science to history. The novel is my greatest love, and my favourite authors span classics and contemporaries. Some recent writers I have particularly enjoyed include Paul Beatty, Alejandro Zambra, Rachel Kushner and Ottessa Moshfegh.
What inspires you as a writer?
Intriguing ‘what if’ ideas, morally complex characters and the challenge of crafting sentences that feel exactly right.
What are you working on next?
I am working on a story where a seemingly normal person slowly descends into sociopathy. I want to explore how someone can unravel and become unrecognisable from who they once were.
What, in your view, makes a great novel?
A compelling premise, layered and unpredictable characters, and prose that is fresh and evocative – without being overwrought.
Why should readers pick up your new book?
Because it is a truly fun read – simple as that.
Carnivore by K Anis Ahmed is published by HarperFiction, £16.99.
THE theme of the Royal Academy’s Summer Exhibition 2025 is “dialogues”, prompting the question: can art help bring together the people of India and Pakistan? Or, indeed, Israel and Iran – or Israel and Palestine?
It so happens that the coordinator of this year’s Summer Exhibition is the internationally celebrated artist and Royal Academician Farshid Moussavi, who is of Iranian origin.
She said: “The Royal Academy Summer Exhibition 2025 is dedicated to art’s capacity to forge dialogues and to nurture sensitivity towards societal concerns, such as ecology, survival and living together. These dialogues can be between people of different races, genders or cultures; between humans, other species and the planet; or across disciplines – art, science, politics, for example.
” In an interview with Eastern Eye, Moussavi stressed that art exhibitions alone cannot solve political problems.
But, she added: “Art exhibitions are about developing sensibilities and giving people the opportunity to see things differently – different from how they are presented, perhaps, in the media, on social media and general media.
“That’s all we can do. There is so much more that unites us than divides us.”
Asked whether art could help temper the anti-immigrant sentiment being stirred by some politicians in the UK, she replied: “The reason why I set the theme of dialogue is to encourage and nurture compassion and understanding. Yes, there is a lot of anti-immigrant [sentiment] – and it’s not just the UK, by the way, it’s everywhere.”
“Sometimes I feel that part of the negative feeling stems from simple ignorance – from not knowing or understanding each other. When you do not understand someone, you become afraid, or you see them as a threat. The more we come together – perhaps by going to exhibitions together, sitting around the table – the more we realise we can cohabit the world while being different. But we need to respect each other.”
The Story Teller by Ley Roberts
In his remarks at the opening of the 257th Summer Exhibition, Andrew Tarsia, director of exhibitions at the RA, said: “It has been held every year without interruption since it was first inaugurated in 1769. The theme of this year’s exhibition is dialogues – a theme which Farshid and the [hanging] committee have explored through more than 1,700 works displayed in the galleries. “Something that really marks this edition is the thoughtfulness with which the theme has been explored – through specific combinations of works that have been carefully curated, selected and hung across the galleries.”
He said Moussavi had worked with other members of the hanging committee, including “Tom Emerson and Stephanie Macdonald of 6a Architects, Vanessa Jackson, Christopher Le Brun, Helen Sear, Caragh Thuring and Richard Wilson. And, of course, the committee was chaired by the president of the Royal Academy, Rebecca Salter.”
This year, there has been a particular focus on architecture.
Tarsia was followed by Moussavi, who said that being the coordinator had given her “a wonderful opportunity to test art, and I’m including architecture as part of that capacity to forge dialogue between people, ideas and things.
Summer Exhibition coordinator Farshid Moussavi, with Royal Academy director of exhibitions Andrea Tarsia in the background
“We live at a time of unprecedented polarity, whether cultural, social or political. Since the world out there is focused on those polarities, here we have the opportunity to dwell on what is common to us.”
She was trying to “find conversations between artworks or within artworks as a way to inspire us to come together and address the many problems we face, which arise from multiple spheres.
“In order to address them, we need to think across things, rather than treat them in isolation. The first such separation we have tried to address is that between architecture and art at the Summer Exhibition. You will notice there is no dedicated architecture room – instead, architecture is treated as art and displayed throughout the galleries.” She added: “Pairing art and architecture has definitely been a theme.”
An installation by Ryan Gander
She referred to the large inflatable balls designed by Ryan Gander, with questions inscribed on them such as, “How much is a lot?” and “When do you know you’re right?”
The RA said: “A playful, large-scale installation by Gander is on display in the Annenberg Courtyard. Featuring five three-metre-diameter inflatable balls inscribed with questions developed with children, the work represents the inquisitiveness of kids, who ask what grown-ups often dismiss as nonsensical or illogical.”
“Raising questions is the start of addressing our problems,” commented Moussavi. “You will notice his inflatable balls in the courtyard and one inside the gallery. They confront us with questions raised by children, but which are very difficult to answer. They make us think. They make us reflect.”
A sectional model of DY Patil University Centre of Excellence, Mumbai, by Spencer de Grey
One ball inside the building had blocked the usual route taken by visitors to the Summer Exhibition. This was deliberate, forcing them to choose between two routes instead of three.
“Some people apparently take the [exhibition] book and go through the numbers,” she quipped. “I do not do that. I go with what I feel like.”
She referred to a building in Ukraine that had been painted by Jock McFadyen: “For an architect, the elevation or façade of a building is like working on a canvas. We see these kinds of dialogues. We have also discovered other themes. The open submissions come in, and we begin to identify issues that seem to be on the minds of artists and architects. One recurring theme is reuse.
“I can point you to an area where artists are working with found materials. There is an existing building that has been transformed or repurposed for a different use, and you can see the old ceiling and the new ceiling side by side. We can take what already exists – perhaps something lifeless or no longer useful – and transform it, give it a new life.
” Committee members Tom Emerson and Stephanie Macdonald of 6a Architects “have, in response to the theme, invited architectural submissions that explore how architecture can bring society together and reconnect with nature and its entangled global past and present”.
On display is work by a number of architects, including London-based Arinjoy Sen. “His work and interests have an acute focus on contested landscapes, citizenship, migration, narrative and spatial justice,” his studio said. “Sen brings a contemporary take on narrative painting, specifically evoking traditional forms such as Mughal miniatures, Kalighat paintings and pattachitra. He revisits the idea of the ritual through and beyond its association with religion.
Rituals and Identity and Theatre of Resistance by Arinjoy Sen
“Sen uses the digital medium combined with traditional craft practices like kantha embroidery and carpet weaving.”
In addition to the large number of public submissions, Royal Academicians exhibiting work include Rana Begum, Frank Bowling, Grayson Perry, Lubaina Himid, Cornelia Parker, Veronica Ryan, Conrad Shawcross, Yinka Shonibare and Rose Wylie.
Suspended works are a recurring theme throughout the exhibition; hanging above visitors in the largest gallery is an installation of textile carcasses by Argentine American artist Tamara Kostianovsky. Other invited artists this year include Lucy and Jorge Orta, Hussein Chalayan, Anya Gallaccio and John Walker.
n The Summer Exhibition is currently open to the public at the Royal Academy of Arts and will run until August 17, 2025
Keep ReadingShow less
This summer, Niall Moorjani returns to the Edinburgh Festival Fringe with 'Kanpur: 1857'
This summer, Niall Moorjani returns to the Edinburgh Festival Fringe with Kanpur: 1857, an explosive new play that fuses biting satire, history and heartfelt storytelling. Written, co-directed and performed by Moorjani, alongside fellow actor and collaborator Jonathan Oldfield, the show dives into the bloody uprising against British colonial rule in 1857 India, focusing on the brutal events in Kanpur.
At its centre is an Indian rebel, played by Moorjani, strapped to a cannon and forced to recount a version of events under the watchful eye of a British officer.
Known for work that intertwines mythology, identity and activism, Moorjani is a neurodiverse, Scottish-Indian theatre-maker based in Edinburgh and founder of Suitcase Storytelling Company. Together with Oldfield, they present a unique show with live music that carries emotional weight and contemporary relevance.
Eastern Eye caught up with Moorjani to talk about the power of theatre, creativity, history and their compelling new production, Kanpur: 1857.
What first connected you to creativity?
I have always just loved stories. It was a classic case of wanting to be a writer when I was small. My mum is a really creative human and wrote (though sadly never published) a fantasy book when I was a teenager, which I thought was the coolest thing. Then I discovered I loved acting and became obsessed with stand-up DVDs by Eddie Izzard and Dylan Moran. Those things inspired me so much. But at its core, I think it is a combination of a love for stories and my mum being so supportive and nurturing.
What inspired your play Kanpur: 1857?
The events of the play were the main inspiration. In 1857, hundreds of thousands of Indians in the north rose up to overthrow the British. Hindus and Muslims were united in the cause. Ultimately, they failed, and the British response was incredibly severe. It is a period of history I have always found fascinating, especially the way the British were horrified to receive the kind of violence they had been inflicting for decades. The play was also inspired by events in Gaza.
Tell us about that.
I found the parallels impossible to ignore – a violent (and morally complex) act of resistance against colonialism being met with vast collective punishment. The play is about 1857, but I am highly aware people will think of Gaza while watching it, and I want that.
Tell us about the play.
It is an explosive, satirical take on the Indian uprising of 1857, focusing specifically on the events in Kanpur. I play an Indian rebel who is strapped to a cannon and forced to tell their version of events by a British officer, played by Jonathan Oldfield. There is a trans love story, romance, jokes, drama, betrayal and devastating storytelling. All of this is set to live music by tabla master Sodhi. We have been super lucky to win the Charlie Hartill (global majority) award with Pleasance and cannot wait for people to see it.
Is there a key message you want to convey with the show?
That what the British did in India is still happening around the world today. Colonialism and colonial oppression did not end in 1857, nor in 1947 with Indian independence. These histories speak directly to our present, and we must learn from them.
Did you learn anything new while putting this play together?
Just how complex and messy the events at Kanpur were. And while I was not shocked, it is always fascinating to see how our sources from that time mostly come from the British – in this case, the victor masquerading as the victim. I could speak all day about it, so you will have to come and see the play.
An explosive new play that fuses biting satire, history and heartfelt storytellingPleasance
What was the biggest challenge of writing, co-directing and acting in this play?
Trying to hold the historical detail in my head, while also making sure the piece worked as theatre, was really tough. Fortunately, Jonathan Oldfield was amazing at helping us check in constantly on clarity without compromising on historical rigour. I expected the creative process to be harder, but it was surprisingly organic. Strangely, we often got stuck on small details – like how period-accurate the British officer’s coat should be, or what the opening projector slides should say. Naturally, self-directing is difficult, but co-directing with Jonathan really helped. As did the whole team.
What is your own favourite moment in the play? I love the big laughs. It is a tough subject, but I am really pleased with how much comedy there is. Those moments bring levity, nuance and hopefully help the heavier parts land more powerfully.
How do you feel being part of this year’s Edinburgh Fringe?
Great. I feel so lucky that we won the Charlie Hartill award. I have done the Fringe so many times on a shoestring, and this has really been a game changer. I feel privileged. The Fringe has its problems, but I absolutely love it, and in real terms, I owe my creative career to it. I love that I have been going for so long. I have a little community I only see during the festival – it is a privilege to be part of that, alongside so many amazing artists.
Why do you love theatre as a medium?
It can and should be anything. It invites us to sit down for a few hours, and then rewards us with something that can be genuinely life-changing. I especially love Fringe theatre – bonkers ideas pulled off in just an hour on tiny budgets by small, immensely talented teams. That is inspiring and exciting.
Why should we all come and watch your play at the Edinburgh Fringe?
Rebellion, cannons, trans love stories and genuinely great satire of the British empire – why should you not?
Kanpur: 1857 is running throughout the Edinburgh Fringe at 15:40, July 30 to August 24, 2025, at Pleasance Courtyard (Beneath). Tickets: www.pleasance.co.uk
Keep ReadingShow less
Scottish-Pakistani theatre-maker Lubna Kerr returns to the Edinburgh Fringe with 'Lunchbox'
Acclaimed Scottish-Pakistani theatre-maker Lubna Kerr returns to the Edinburgh Fringe with Lunchbox – the final instalment of her deeply personal and widely praised ‘BOX’ trilogy, following Tickbox and Chatterbox.
Inspired by her own upbringing as a Pakistani immigrant girl in Glasgow, Lunchbox is a powerful one-woman show that tackles themes of identity, race, bullying and belonging through the eyes of two teenagers growing up on the same street but living vastly different lives. With humour, honesty and heart, Kerr brings multiple characters to life, including her younger self and a troubled classmate, as she explores whether we are shaped by our environment or capable of breaking the cycle.
Ahead of the show’s run at this year’s Edinburgh Fringe, she speaks to Eastern Eye about her creative journey, the inspiration behind the trilogy and why she believes now is the time to share these stories.
Lunchbox is a powerful one-woman show that tackles themes of identity, race, bullying and belongingInstagram/ lubnakerr
How do you reflect on your creative journey?
When I started writing my first play Tickbox, I doubted myself – would anyone come to see it? But it has since been staged all over the UK and is still touring. I have come so far in my creative journey and love being able to find new stories to tell the world.
How much are you looking forward to returning to the Edinburgh Fringe? I love the Fringe. It is my favourite part of the year.
Tell us about your new show. Lunchbox is a one-woman show and is the final part of the ‘BOX’ trilogy of my life as a Pakistani immigrant girl growing up in Glasgow. There are eight characters – some familiar and some new.
How does this compare to your other shows Tickbox and Chatterbox?
It is similar but different. It explores the next stage of my school life, but this time through the eyes of the bully, Steven.
How have you felt going on a journey with this unique trilogy?
It was never meant to be a trilogy when I first started writing, but as the stories came out, I realised I had so much to share that I could not do it all in one play.
What is the biggest challenge of doing a solo show?
Keeping well and pacing your energy. There is no understudy, so I need to make sure I get enough rest and can be fresh for my shows every day.
She says, ''do not assume you know what is going on in people’s lives behind closed doors''Instagram/ lubnakerr
Who are you hoping to reach with this show?
Those who were bullied, those who stood by and did nothing, and those who were the bullies.
Is there a key message you want to convey with this show?
Do not assume you know what is going on in people’s lives behind closed doors. I want audiences to think about who they wrote off in life. Who could they have given a hand to? Whose life did they assume was a waste? Who will they be clapping for? Have they forgiven their bully?
What do you most love about live theatre?
I love performing and sharing unheard or untold stories about the diaspora. We have such a rich culture and heritage, and we need our voices to be heard. Theatre is the vehicle to do this.
How do you feel when you are on stage?
I love being on stage, whether performing a play or doing comedy. I love feeling connected to the audience – having them hold onto my every word and fall into a trance with my characters, helping them forget their worries for an hour.
Why should we all come and watch your new show Lunchbox?
Lunchbox has a universal theme of bullying and discrimination, but it is told by an older south Asian woman. How many of us are out there doing this? I want to inspire anyone of any age to come and share their stories on stage, and let the world know that we are more than just curries and cricket (though I do love both).