Samson’s century leads India to record T20 total and series sweep
Samson, who opened for India, scored 111 off 47 balls, marking his first T20 international century.
Samson was named player of the match, with his standout performance highlighted by hitting five consecutive sixes off leg-spinner Rishad Hossain. (Photo: X/@BCCI)
By EasternEyeOct 13, 2024
INDIA secured a 3-0 series sweep against Bangladesh in the final T20 on Saturday, driven by Sanju Samson's powerful century. India posted a record total of 297-6, the highest by a Test-playing nation in T20 internationals, surpassing Afghanistan's 278-3 against Ireland in 2019. This is the second-highest T20 total overall, after Nepal’s 314-3 against Mongolia during the 2023 Asian Games.
Samson, who opened for India, scored 111 off 47 balls, marking his first T20 international century. His innings included 11 fours and eight sixes. India elected to bat first in Hyderabad and set a daunting target for Bangladesh.
In response, Bangladesh managed 164-7, falling short by 133 runs. It was also the last T20 match for former captain Mahmudullah Riyad, who scored eight runs before being dismissed by Mayank Yadav. Mahmudullah received a pat on the back from India’s captain Suryakumar Yadav as he left the field.
"We achieved a lot as a team," said Suryakumar. "I want to have selfless cricketers. We want to enjoy each others' success. We are having some fun."
Bangladesh’s captain, Najmul Hossain Shanto, admitted that his team was outplayed throughout the series. "We didn't play our best cricket," he said. "We didn't execute our plans as a batting unit in all three matches. We should believe in ourselves that we can compete."
Samson was named player of the match, with his standout performance highlighted by hitting five consecutive sixes off leg-spinner Rishad Hossain. He shared a 173-run partnership with Suryakumar, who scored 75 off 35 balls, though his innings was overshadowed by Samson’s aggressive play.
After Samson was dismissed by Mustafizur Rahman, he left the field to a standing ovation. Suryakumar followed in the next over, bowled by Mahmudullah, who had announced his retirement before the second match.
Hardik Pandya, who scored 47 off 18 balls, and Riyan Parag, who contributed 34 off 13 balls, kept India’s momentum going with a series of boundaries, helping the team surpass their previous best T20 score of 260-5 against Sri Lanka in 2017.
Bangladesh's chase never gained momentum, despite a 42-run contribution from wicketkeeper Litton Das and an unbeaten 63 from Towhid Hridoy. India’s leg-spinner Ravi Bishnoi claimed three wickets, including the key dismissals of Litton and Najmul.
Pandya was named player of the series, contributing 118 runs, one wicket, and five catches across the three matches.
India will now turn their focus to the upcoming Test series against New Zealand, starting next week in Bengaluru.
A child is hoisted into a small boat as migrants wait in the water for a 'taxi boat' to take them across the channel to the UK at dawn on September 19, 2025 in Gravelines, France. (Photo by Dan Kitwood/Getty Images)
BRITAIN's plan to use artificial intelligence (AI) to assess the ages of asylum seekers has sparked concern among human rights groups, who warn the technology could misclassify children as adults and deny them vital protections.
The government intends to introduce facial age-estimation technology in 2026 to verify the ages of migrants claiming to be under 18, particularly those arriving on small boats from France. Officials say the move will help prevent adults from posing as children to exploit the asylum system.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer is under growing pressure to control migration, as Nigel Farage’s anti-immigration Reform UK party gains support in opinion polls. More than 35,000 people have crossed the English Channel in small boats this year, a 33 per cent rise on the same period in 2024.
Meanwhile, rights campaigners and social workers argue that assessing the age of migrants is a complex and sensitive process that cannot be replaced by technology.
“Assessing the ages of migrants is a complex process which should not be open to shortcuts,” said Luke Geoghegan, head of policy and research at the British Association of Social Workers. “This should never be compromised for perceived quicker results through artificial intelligence.”
Children who arrive in the UK without parents or guardians are entitled to legal aid, education, and social worker support under the care of local authorities. Charities fear that using facial recognition systems could result in minors being wrongly placed in adult asylum hotels, without proper safeguarding or support.
The Home Office said the technology would not be used in isolation. “Robust age assessments for migrants are vital to maintaining border security,” a spokesperson said. “This technology will not be used alone, but as part of a broad set of methods used by trained assessors.”
Governments worldwide are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to manage migration. Britain announced in April that it would deploy AI tools to speed up asylum decisions, helping caseworkers summarise interviews and analyse country-specific data. In July, it signed a partnership with OpenAI to explore how to use AI in education, justice, defence, and security.
But rights groups have warned that asylum seekers should not be used as test subjects for unproven technologies. “The asylum system must not be the testing ground for deeply flawed AI tools operating with minimal transparency,” said Sile Reynolds, head of asylum advocacy at Freedom from Torture.
Anna Bacciarelli, senior AI researcher at Human Rights Watch, said facial age estimation could “undermine privacy and other human rights”, adding: “We don’t actually know if it works.”
Facial recognition technologies have previously faced criticism for extracting sensitive biometric data and reinforcing racial or gender biases. They have also been used by London’s police at protests and public events, including the Notting Hill Carnival.
“There are always going to be worries about sensitive biometric data being taken from vulnerable people and used against them,” said Tim Squirrell, head of strategy at tech rights group Foxglove. “The machine tells you that you’re 19 – how do you question that? It’s completely unaccountable.”
Experts say AI models trained on biased or incomplete data can reproduce historic prejudices. The Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit (GMIAU) said some young asylum seekers had been told they were too tall or too hairy to be under 18.
“Children are being treated as subjects of immigration control, not as children,” said Rivka Shaw, a GMIAU policy officer, describing the practice as “linked to racism and adultification.”
The Helen Bamber Foundation found that nearly half of migrants reassessed in 2024 – about 680 people – were actually children wrongly sent to adult accommodation.
“A child in adult housing is put in a shared room with strangers and no safeguarding checks,” said Kamena Dorling, the foundation’s policy director.
A July report by the Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration urged the Home Office to involve trained child-protection professionals in age decisions.
“Decisions on age should be made by child-protection professionals,” said Dorling. “All the concerns we have about human decision-making also apply to AI decision-making.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.