BRITISH home secretary Priti Patel has slammed the critics of her government’s controversial immigration deal with Rwanda and the BBC’s “xenophobic” overtones in reporting the matter.
She was "taken aback" by the tone of BBC journalists' references to Rwanda after the agreement with the African country was announced, she told The Telegraph.
She said the corporation’s “undercurrent” was similar to the views expressed by opposition parties.
"When you hear the critics start to stereotype, start to generalise, first of all that's all very offensive. It's deeply offensive, and it's based on ignorance and prejudice, some of this, in my view. I could call them lazy and sloppy characterisations, but actually they're not. I heard plenty of that not long after the announcement was made”.
"There are always going to be critics, and we live in a free country," she said in an interview with the newspaper published on Saturday (23).
According to documents published by the government last week, Patel overruled reservations from officials about her plan to send thousands of asylum seekers to Rwanda.
The plan, unveiled by prime minister Boris Johnson, seeks to act as a deterrent to migrants who make illegal boat crossings to Britain from France.
It has drawn heavy criticism from political opponents and campaigners.
In an exchange of letters with Patel, the top official in the Home Office highlighted uncertainty over the scheme's value to the taxpayer.
The government has said it would contribute an initial £120 million to the scheme.
"I do not believe sufficient evidence can be obtained to demonstrate that the policy will have a deterrent effect significant enough to make the policy value for money," Home Office permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft said.
Patel acknowledged the concerns but stated her belief that without taking action to stop the crossings, both the monetary costs and the loss of life among those who attempt to navigate the busy shipping channel would rise.
"It would therefore be imprudent in my view, as home secretary, to allow the absence of quantifiable and dynamic modelling ... to delay delivery of a policy that we believe will reduce illegal migration, save lives, and ultimately break the business model of the smuggling gangs," she wrote.
Last year, more than 28,000 migrants and refugees made the crossing from mainland Europe to Britain, a fraction of the number arriving in other European countries, but enough to keep immigration a politically sensitive topic among some voters.
Site Navigation
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Keir Starmer speaks to soldiers as he visits the Netherlands marines training base, as part of the UK-Netherland Joint Amphibious Force in Rotterdam ahead of the NATO summit on June 24, 2025 in Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Getty Images
Why ex-NATO chief thinks UK is 'not safe'
Apr 14, 2026
UK IS "not safe" and its national security is "in peril", former NATO chief George Robertson is set to warn, pointing to gaps in defence spending, delays in planning and what he calls a lack of preparedness.
In a speech in Salisbury, southern England, Robertson is expected to say: "We are underprepared. We are underinsured. We are under attack. We are not safe," and describe the Iran war as a "rude wake-up call".
His warning is based on what he says is a gap between commitments and delivery. Robertson, who led a Strategic Defence Review commissioned by prime minister Keir Starmer, told the Financial Times that the prime minister was "not willing to make the necessary investment".
A 10-year defence investment plan that was meant to follow the review and was expected late last year has not yet been published, adding to concerns over implementation.
Robertson is also expected to accuse ministers of "corrosive complacency" and criticise decisions by "non-military experts" in the treasury, which he describes as "vandalism".
He is expected to say: "Britain's national security and safety is in peril," and add, "Lip service is paid to the risks, the threats, the bright red signals of danger -- but even a promised national conversation about defence can't be started."
He will also say: "We cannot defend Britain with an ever-expanding welfare budget."
Robertson’s assessment comes against a backdrop of what he describes as a worsening security environment, following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and tensions in West Asia.
The Strategic Defence Review he co-wrote called for a shift towards drones, digital warfare and data-driven combat systems, reflecting lessons from the war in Ukraine.
Starmer has pledged to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product from next year, increasing to three per cent in the next parliament, and said the war in Iran must be a turning point for Britain as it deals with a more "volatile and dangerous" world.
The increase comes amid demands from US president Donald Trump that NATO allies spend more on defence.
A government spokesman said: "We are delivering on the Strategic Defence Review to meet the threats we face," adding the defence investment plan will be published "as soon as possible".
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less









