BRITISH home secretary Priti Patel has slammed the critics of her government’s controversial immigration deal with Rwanda and the BBC’s “xenophobic” overtones in reporting the matter.
She was "taken aback" by the tone of BBC journalists' references to Rwanda after the agreement with the African country was announced, she told The Telegraph.
She said the corporation’s “undercurrent” was similar to the views expressed by opposition parties.
"When you hear the critics start to stereotype, start to generalise, first of all that's all very offensive. It's deeply offensive, and it's based on ignorance and prejudice, some of this, in my view. I could call them lazy and sloppy characterisations, but actually they're not. I heard plenty of that not long after the announcement was made”.
"There are always going to be critics, and we live in a free country," she said in an interview with the newspaper published on Saturday (23).
According to documents published by the government last week, Patel overruled reservations from officials about her plan to send thousands of asylum seekers to Rwanda.
The plan, unveiled by prime minister Boris Johnson, seeks to act as a deterrent to migrants who make illegal boat crossings to Britain from France.
It has drawn heavy criticism from political opponents and campaigners.
In an exchange of letters with Patel, the top official in the Home Office highlighted uncertainty over the scheme's value to the taxpayer.
The government has said it would contribute an initial £120 million to the scheme.
"I do not believe sufficient evidence can be obtained to demonstrate that the policy will have a deterrent effect significant enough to make the policy value for money," Home Office permanent secretary Matthew Rycroft said.
Patel acknowledged the concerns but stated her belief that without taking action to stop the crossings, both the monetary costs and the loss of life among those who attempt to navigate the busy shipping channel would rise.
"It would therefore be imprudent in my view, as home secretary, to allow the absence of quantifiable and dynamic modelling ... to delay delivery of a policy that we believe will reduce illegal migration, save lives, and ultimately break the business model of the smuggling gangs," she wrote.
Last year, more than 28,000 migrants and refugees made the crossing from mainland Europe to Britain, a fraction of the number arriving in other European countries, but enough to keep immigration a politically sensitive topic among some voters.
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You

Starmer said he would resist any challenge to his leadership and argued that any successor would face the same financial pressures.
Getty Images
Starmer says he will fight to remain prime minister amid defence spending row
Jun 12, 2026
Highlights
- Starmer says he will fight to remain prime minister
- Rejects claims he has lost authority
- Healey and Carns quit over defence spending plans
- PM says defence remains government's top priority
PRIME MINISTER Keir Starmer has rejected suggestions that he has lost authority and said he will fight to remain in office following the resignations of two ministers over the government's defence spending plans.
Speaking to the BBC in his first public comments since defence secretary John Healey's resignation, Starmer said he would not step aside and insisted he had a duty to continue serving as prime minister.
The comments come a day after Healey resigned, saying the government had failed to commit the resources needed to keep the country safe. Armed forces minister Al Carns also stepped down, with both ministers criticising the government's approach to defence funding.
Starmer said he would resist any challenge to his leadership and argued that any successor would face the same financial pressures.
"I'm not going to walk away," Starmer told the BBC.
With rivals expected to launch a contest to replace him in the coming weeks or months, Starmer said he would fight any challenge to his role.
Pilot groups question probe ahead of Air India crash anniversary
"Let me just be clear with you, that's not about personal vanity, it's not about stubbornness, it's out of a very deep sense of duty. I was elected to serve this country, notwithstanding the difficult circumstances. That is what I am doing," he said.
The prime minister said he did not want to "plunge" the country into the "chaos" of a leadership contest and maintained that defence spending would remain his government's top priority.
Rejecting Healey's criticism, Starmer said defence and security were his main priorities and would continue to be so when spending decisions were made.
He said he had already made "hard-edged" choices to reduce spending in other departments in order to increase investment in defence.
Starmer told BBC political editor Chris Mason that he had made "hard-edged decisions" to increase defence spending and said it would be the "number one priority at every spending review".
"Whoever is prime minister is going to face the same prevailing winds as I am facing. None of that is going to change," Starmer said.
Earlier, former Defence Secretary John Healey said the government's defence investment plan fell "well short of what is required for defence".
Carns also criticised the plans, telling the BBC that the government's upcoming defence investment programme was not "transformative enough".
The resignations have added to pressure on Starmer's leadership, with Labour facing internal divisions over spending priorities. However, the prime minister remained defiant and repeated that defence spending was his "number one priority".
Keep ReadingShow less







