Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

‘Piers Morgan ruling is why Ofcom needs to go’

‘Piers Morgan ruling is why Ofcom needs to go’

WHEN I saw her lying in the hospital bed, my heart broke. Again. It was the seventh time in her 30 years she had tried to take her life.

Once again, I did not know why. Once again, I was woken up by a frantic, drunken, late-night phone call from her husband. Once again, I was left to clear up the mess. Decades on, long after they have both passed, the memories still haunt me.


South Asians are not good at speaking about trauma, mental health issues, or in fact anything that, quite wrongly, is considered to “bring shame on the community”. We hide it away and never speak about it.

And that is why I was, and remain, so angry with that imbecile, Piers Morgan. Here is a privileged white man. The privilege to know that, like former US president Donald Trump once did, when he tweets or opens his mouth, the nation acts on his awful, basest thoughts.

When Morgan implied that Meghan Markle was a liar for telling US chat show host Oprah Winfrey that, at times, she had suicidal thoughts; when Morgan called mental health issues “the go-to excuse for any poor performance in elite sport”, a joke about a tennis player who happened to be black; but when he never called out Ben Stokes, the white cricketer, for seeking a mental health break; that made me, well, yes, incensed.

I fell into his trap because that’s exactly what this rabble-rouser wants. He wants to evoke the most basic emotions so he can get off being talked about. It excites him. He relishes the controversy and indignant debate he leaves in his destructive wake.

Barnie 12 Barnie Choudhury

A politician once repeated Oscar Wilde’s line to me – what’s worse than being talked about is not being talked about. And there you have Morgan.

But here’s what I can’t fathom – what on earth was Ofcom, the broadcast regulator, thinking in backing this emotional neanderthal?

New readers start here. Morgan spouts his nonsense while hosting ITV’s Good Morning Britain. More than 50,000 viewers complain to Ofcom.

Morgan’s co-presenter Susanna Reid, rightly, admonishes him. He flounces off the set after being, rightly again, tackled by his colleague Alex Beresford. ITV sacks him or Morgan quits. Ensue a national debate.

Ofcom should have ended that discussion this week with its ruling, but it didn’t. I have always defended the right to offend, but when you question someone's thoughts, especially when someone is vulnerable, you have crossed a line.

Here’s my logic. Let’s say, hypothetically, I’m an unknown BBC local radio presenter, and I’m discussing with my colleagues the topic of the day, mental illness. I get a call from someone I’ve met once – let’s call her Mrs M. She says she’s contemplating suicide, and I say, “I don’t believe you, you’re seeking attention.”

My co-presenter points out I’m uncaring and unsympathetic. Listeners complain to Ofcom. My boss decides to sack me. What do you think Ofcom would do to a little known brown journalist from a little-listened-to radio station?

So, here’s the question: why did Ofcom make Morgan’s incendiary comments a battle between “harm and offence” and “freedom of expression”?

Here’s why I ask. What if my unfiltered hatred of anyone with a mental illness – because there is no such thing, they are weak, it’s God’s way of weeding out feeble people, and it fits the Darwinian theory of natural selection – leads to Mrs M taking her life?

Would Ofcom say, ‘We thought long and hard, but we find Asian Smashy-Nicey not guilty. It was a fine judgement call. His co-presenter immediately tapped him on the wrist. But if we ruled against Smashy-Nicey, we would have set a dangerous precedent and killed his right to freedom of expression?’ Um. No. The all-white Ofcom panel members would, quite rightly, throw the book at me, and fine the radio station.

This ruling shows why Ofcom is not fit for purpose. It can shut down a Chinese-owned TV station for breaching “freedom of expression rights”, but it can't sanction a privileged, infamous, white man.

By the way, in the scenario above, it was never about my hiding behind Article 10 of the European Convention of Human Rights, freedom of expression. It was about whether I caused harm and offence. I’m bang to rights. I have breached section 2.

Although implicit, freedom of expression is a legal right, not a regulatory one. Ofcom is right to defend it. But it should not use it as a crutch for flawed decision-making.

Now then, is there any broadcaster out there who wants a brown boy unafraid to use the N-word, P-word or C-word to generate great publicity? Look no further. Contact my agent Ivor Nomorales, because I can get away with abusive language, ’cos I know my freedom of expression rights, innit?

Thanks, Ofcom mate.

Barnie Choudhury served as a non-executive director for Ofcom during 2012-2017

More For You

‘My daughter’s miracle recovery from fall defied all expectations’

Lord Bilimoria and daughter Zara

‘My daughter’s miracle recovery from fall defied all expectations’

IN MY entrepreneurial journey, I have noticed that crises happen out of the blue. In fact, global crises are more than not, unpredicted. Sadly, the same is true in one’s personal and family life, where everything can turn on a dime.

On December 23, last year, at 2:15 am, our 26-year daughter Zara fell off the terrace outside her first-floor bedroom at our house in Cape Town. It was a freak accident, and it happens, her younger brother and sister were awake and saw her fall.

Keep ReadingShow less
Does likeability count more than brilliance?

Higher education participation is 50 per cent for British south Asian students

Does likeability count more than brilliance?

THE headline in the Daily Telegraph read: An 18-year-old with a higher IQ than Stephen Hawking has passed 23 A-levels.

The gushing piece went on to report that Mahnoor Cheema, whose family originate from Pakistan, had also received an unconditional offer from Oxford University to read medicine.

Keep ReadingShow less
Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories
of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal on Mandalay Hill in Burma at the position once held by Sikh machine gunners who fought to liberate the area

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal OBE VR

ACROSS the Asian subcontinent 80 years ago, the guns finally fell silent on August 15, the Second World War had truly ended.

Yet, in Britain, what became known as VJ Day often remains a distant afterthought, overshadowed by Victory in Europe against the Nazis, which is marked three months earlier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being

iStock

Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

Justice Rangajeeva Wimalasena

Judicial well-being has long been a taboo subject, despite the untold toll it has taken on judges who must grapple daily with the problems and traumas of others. Research shows that judicial stress is more pronounced among magistrates and trial judges, who routinely face intense caseloads and are exposed to distressing material. The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being. They ultimately affect the integrity of the institution and the quality of justice delivered. This is why judicial well-being requires serious recognition and priority.

As early as 1981, American clinical psychologist Isaiah M. Zimmerman presented one of the first and most comprehensive analyses of the impact of stress on judges. He identified a collection of stressors, including overwhelming caseloads, isolation, the pressure to maintain a strong public image, and the loneliness of the judicial role. He also highlighted deeply personal challenges such as midlife transitions, marital strain, and diminishing career satisfaction, all of which quietly but persistently erode judicial well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fauja Singh

Fauja Singh

Getty Images

What Fauja Singh taught me

I met Fauja Singh twice, once when we hiked Snowdon and I was in awe he was wearing shoes, not trainers and walking like a pro, no fear, just smiling away. I was struggling to do the hike with trainers. I remember my mum saying “what an inspiration”. He was a very humble and kind human being. The second time I met him was when I was at an event, and again, he just had such a radiant energy about him. He’s one of a kind and I’m blessed to have met him.

He wasn’t just a runner. He was a symbol. A living contradiction to everything we’re taught about age, limits, and when to stop dreaming. And now that he’s gone, it feels like a light has gone out—not just in Punjab or east London, but in the hearts of everyone who saw a bit of themselves in his journey.

Keep ReadingShow less