Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

PepsiCo Proposes Settlement To Indian Potato Farmers Whom They Sued

FOOD and beverages giant PepsiCo today (26)offered to settle lawsuits against four Indian farmers who it has dragged to court for allegedly illegally growing a variety of potatoes ‘registered’ by the company.

Nine farmers from Sabarkantha and Aravalli districts of country's Gujarat state are being sued by PepsiCo for allegedly growing a variety of potatoes for which it has claimed Plant Variety Protection (PVP) rights.


During a hearing in the commercial court in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on Friday (26), the firm offered to settle the dispute if the farmers gave an undertaking to purchase this specific variety of seeds from the company and thereafter sell the potato produced to it.

Senior counsel Anand Yagnik, who appeared for the four farmers of Sabarkantha district, told the court he will discuss this settlement proposal with the farmers and inform the court about the outcome during the next hearing.

Commercial Court Judge M C Tyagi Friday (26) extended its previous order restricting these farmers from using the patented seeds till the next hearing, which was kept for June 12.

The multinational giant has sought damages of Rs 10 million from each of the four farmers in its suit filed at the commercial court in Ahmedabad, and Rs 2m from each of the farmers sued at a district court in Modasa town of Arvalli district.

Two days ago, over 190 activists came out in support of these farmers and also requested the Indian government to ask PepsiCo India to withdraw its ‘false’ cases against Gujarat farmers.

In a letter to the Indian ministry of agriculture, 194 signatories have sought financial aid and protection of rights of farmers who have been sued for growing and selling a potato variety called FC-5 potato, for which PepsiCo India Holdings claimed to have obtained "exclusive rights in the country in 2016".

(PTI)

More For You

Amazon

How Amazon allegedly used Levi’s and Hanes to push rivals to raise prices

iStock

How Amazon allegedly used Levi’s and Hanes to push rivals to raise prices

  • Court filing alleges Amazon used brands to influence rival pricing
  • Levi’s and Hanes cited in internal exchanges over price hikes
  • Case adds to growing regulatory pressure on Amazon in the US

Fresh details from a California antitrust lawsuit against Amazon are shedding light on how the company may have handled pricing behind the scenes. Newly unsealed court documents suggest Amazon pressured major brands to intervene with rival retailers when prices dropped elsewhere, raising fresh concerns around Amazon price fixing and competition in online retail.

The filings, part of an ongoing case led by Rob Bonta, offer a closer look at what regulators describe as a structured approach to keeping prices in check across platforms. The case, first filed in 2022, is expected to go to trial in 2027.

Keep ReadingShow less