Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Submit Guest Post

PepsiCo Proposes Settlement To Indian Potato Farmers Whom They Sued

FOOD and beverages giant PepsiCo today (26)offered to settle lawsuits against four Indian farmers who it has dragged to court for allegedly illegally growing a variety of potatoes ‘registered’ by the company.

Nine farmers from Sabarkantha and Aravalli districts of country's Gujarat state are being sued by PepsiCo for allegedly growing a variety of potatoes for which it has claimed Plant Variety Protection (PVP) rights.


During a hearing in the commercial court in the western Indian city of Ahmedabad on Friday (26), the firm offered to settle the dispute if the farmers gave an undertaking to purchase this specific variety of seeds from the company and thereafter sell the potato produced to it.

Senior counsel Anand Yagnik, who appeared for the four farmers of Sabarkantha district, told the court he will discuss this settlement proposal with the farmers and inform the court about the outcome during the next hearing.

Commercial Court Judge M C Tyagi Friday (26) extended its previous order restricting these farmers from using the patented seeds till the next hearing, which was kept for June 12.

The multinational giant has sought damages of Rs 10 million from each of the four farmers in its suit filed at the commercial court in Ahmedabad, and Rs 2m from each of the farmers sued at a district court in Modasa town of Arvalli district.

Two days ago, over 190 activists came out in support of these farmers and also requested the Indian government to ask PepsiCo India to withdraw its ‘false’ cases against Gujarat farmers.

In a letter to the Indian ministry of agriculture, 194 signatories have sought financial aid and protection of rights of farmers who have been sued for growing and selling a potato variety called FC-5 potato, for which PepsiCo India Holdings claimed to have obtained "exclusive rights in the country in 2016".

(PTI)

Add EasternEye As Your Trusted Source
preferred source on google news

More For You

Goldman Sachs

The tribunal found flaws in Goldman Sachs' handling of a senior executive's redundancy while he was on paternity leave

Getty Images

Goldman Sachs faces £1.45m blow over paternity leave dismissal

  • Goldman Sachs has been ordered to pay a former executive £1.45 million over his dismissal while on paternity leave.
  • The tribunal found the bank failed to follow a fair redundancy process, although it said there was a 50 per cent chance he would have lost his job anyway.
  • Goldman Sachs says it strongly disagrees with the ruling and intends to challenge the decision.

Goldman Sachs has been ordered to pay a former senior executive £1.45 million after an employment tribunal found serious flaws in the way the investment bank handled his redundancy while he was on paternity leave.

The Goldman Sachs paternity leave case centres on Jonathan Reeves, the bank's former deputy global head of the compliance "control room" in London. Reeves argued that he was unfairly dismissed and discriminated against after being selected for redundancy while taking six months of parental leave to care for his newborn child.

Keep ReadingShow less