Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nationality and Borders Bill will make UK safer, says Patel

Nationality and Borders Bill will make UK safer, says Patel

THE UK has a proud history of being open to the world. Global Britain continues in that tradition.

Our society is enriched by legal migration and we are a better country for it.

The Government’s Nationality and Borders Bill, back in the House of Lords and one step closer to becoming law, builds upon our proud tradition of helping those in need from around the world. This will never change.

The Bill is designed to make our immigration system fair to those who play by the rules, and firm on those who seek to abuse the system.

UK targets scientific ways to determine asylum seekers' age Home Secretary Priti Patel (Photo by Victoria Jones - Pool/Getty Images)

  • For example, the Bill will address many of the unfair historical anomalies around citizenship which have existed for too long in British Nationality law.
  • British Nationality law has not changed significantly since 1983, and some of the provisions are very much outdated.
  • One change we are making to address this is introducing a new adult registration route so that I, as the Home Secretary has the discretion to grant citizenship to adults in certain circumstances. This covers a range of cases, including where exceptional circumstances have prevented an individual from becoming a British citizen.

Also Read | 'Tories have a problem with Asians'


We will also introduce further flexibility to waive residence requirements for naturalisation more quickly in exceptional cases. For instance, where people are not able to meet residence requirements to qualify for British citizenship through no fault of their own. This will help to ensure injustices like those faced by the Windrush generation categorically never happen again.

These significant changes to Nationality law will protect people from a range of injustices that we have seen in the past, ensuring that the system is fair.

I have found it completely shocking that opponents to the Nationality and Borders Bill have deliberately mischaracterised and misrepresented some important measures we are trying to introduce. One of these is specifically around proposals in the Bill relating to removing British citizenship.

Irresponsible scaremongering has regrettably led to considerable confusion and fear, which is why I want to offer some reassurance here specifically about deprivation of citizenship and what the Bill will mean for this important power.

It has been wrongly suggested that six million dual-nationality Britons could face having their British citizenship taken away, or that future Home Secretaries could deprive people of citizenship for minor misdemeanours just because we felt like it. These claims are the most wildly inaccurate reports I have seen in recent months. The reality is that the part of the Bill concerning what are called Deprivation Notices is just an administrative change.

Removing British citizenship has been possible for over a century – since the 1914 British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act. The power is currently contained within the British Nationality Act of 1981, so this is nothing new. It is only used against those who have acquired citizenship by fraud, and against the most dangerous people - like terrorists, extremists, and serious organised criminals. It is not something that will affect ordinary people. It always comes with a right of appeal.

However, the change we are making is nothing to do with any of that. It is simply about the process of notifying someone about removal of their citizenship. We will always try to tell someone that their citizenship has been deprived, but it might not be possible in exceptional circumstances – for example, if they are in a warzone or if informing them would reveal sensitive intelligence sources. It can’t be right that we are unable to protect the public with this measure because someone tries to hide from the law, or because there is no effective postal service.

It does not breach human rights or international law. It is simply untrue that it will have a disproportionate impact on non-white British citizens or those with dual passports. The suggestion that millions of people could be stripped of their nationality without warning or left stateless is not rooted in reality.

The Nationality and Borders Bill contains vital measures to make the UK safer and protect our borders – something that is in the interests of all Britons. And we will continue to welcome highly- killed people from around the world and to offer sanctuary to those fleeing persecution. Far from being inhumane, it will finally mean that we have a system which is fair but firm.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less