Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nationality and Borders Bill will make UK safer, says Patel

Nationality and Borders Bill will make UK safer, says Patel

THE UK has a proud history of being open to the world. Global Britain continues in that tradition.

Our society is enriched by legal migration and we are a better country for it.

The Government’s Nationality and Borders Bill, back in the House of Lords and one step closer to becoming law, builds upon our proud tradition of helping those in need from around the world. This will never change.

The Bill is designed to make our immigration system fair to those who play by the rules, and firm on those who seek to abuse the system.

UK targets scientific ways to determine asylum seekers' age Home Secretary Priti Patel (Photo by Victoria Jones - Pool/Getty Images)

  • For example, the Bill will address many of the unfair historical anomalies around citizenship which have existed for too long in British Nationality law.
  • British Nationality law has not changed significantly since 1983, and some of the provisions are very much outdated.
  • One change we are making to address this is introducing a new adult registration route so that I, as the Home Secretary has the discretion to grant citizenship to adults in certain circumstances. This covers a range of cases, including where exceptional circumstances have prevented an individual from becoming a British citizen.

Also Read | 'Tories have a problem with Asians'


We will also introduce further flexibility to waive residence requirements for naturalisation more quickly in exceptional cases. For instance, where people are not able to meet residence requirements to qualify for British citizenship through no fault of their own. This will help to ensure injustices like those faced by the Windrush generation categorically never happen again.

These significant changes to Nationality law will protect people from a range of injustices that we have seen in the past, ensuring that the system is fair.

I have found it completely shocking that opponents to the Nationality and Borders Bill have deliberately mischaracterised and misrepresented some important measures we are trying to introduce. One of these is specifically around proposals in the Bill relating to removing British citizenship.

Irresponsible scaremongering has regrettably led to considerable confusion and fear, which is why I want to offer some reassurance here specifically about deprivation of citizenship and what the Bill will mean for this important power.

It has been wrongly suggested that six million dual-nationality Britons could face having their British citizenship taken away, or that future Home Secretaries could deprive people of citizenship for minor misdemeanours just because we felt like it. These claims are the most wildly inaccurate reports I have seen in recent months. The reality is that the part of the Bill concerning what are called Deprivation Notices is just an administrative change.

Removing British citizenship has been possible for over a century – since the 1914 British Nationality and Status of Aliens Act. The power is currently contained within the British Nationality Act of 1981, so this is nothing new. It is only used against those who have acquired citizenship by fraud, and against the most dangerous people - like terrorists, extremists, and serious organised criminals. It is not something that will affect ordinary people. It always comes with a right of appeal.

However, the change we are making is nothing to do with any of that. It is simply about the process of notifying someone about removal of their citizenship. We will always try to tell someone that their citizenship has been deprived, but it might not be possible in exceptional circumstances – for example, if they are in a warzone or if informing them would reveal sensitive intelligence sources. It can’t be right that we are unable to protect the public with this measure because someone tries to hide from the law, or because there is no effective postal service.

It does not breach human rights or international law. It is simply untrue that it will have a disproportionate impact on non-white British citizens or those with dual passports. The suggestion that millions of people could be stripped of their nationality without warning or left stateless is not rooted in reality.

The Nationality and Borders Bill contains vital measures to make the UK safer and protect our borders – something that is in the interests of all Britons. And we will continue to welcome highly- killed people from around the world and to offer sanctuary to those fleeing persecution. Far from being inhumane, it will finally mean that we have a system which is fair but firm.

More For You

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories
of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal on Mandalay Hill in Burma at the position once held by Sikh machine gunners who fought to liberate the area

Comment: Why it’s vital to tell stories of Asian troops’ war effort

Jay Singh Sohal OBE VR

ACROSS the Asian subcontinent 80 years ago, the guns finally fell silent on August 15, the Second World War had truly ended.

Yet, in Britain, what became known as VJ Day often remains a distant afterthought, overshadowed by Victory in Europe against the Nazis, which is marked three months earlier.

Keep ReadingShow less
Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being

iStock

Judicial well-being: From taboo to recognition by the UN

Justice Rangajeeva Wimalasena

Judicial well-being has long been a taboo subject, despite the untold toll it has taken on judges who must grapple daily with the problems and traumas of others. Research shows that judicial stress is more pronounced among magistrates and trial judges, who routinely face intense caseloads and are exposed to distressing material. The causes of judicial stress are multifaceted, and their effects go far beyond individual well-being. They ultimately affect the integrity of the institution and the quality of justice delivered. This is why judicial well-being requires serious recognition and priority.

As early as 1981, American clinical psychologist Isaiah M. Zimmerman presented one of the first and most comprehensive analyses of the impact of stress on judges. He identified a collection of stressors, including overwhelming caseloads, isolation, the pressure to maintain a strong public image, and the loneliness of the judicial role. He also highlighted deeply personal challenges such as midlife transitions, marital strain, and diminishing career satisfaction, all of which quietly but persistently erode judicial well-being.

Keep ReadingShow less
Fauja Singh

Fauja Singh

Getty Images

What Fauja Singh taught me

I met Fauja Singh twice, once when we hiked Snowdon and I was in awe he was wearing shoes, not trainers and walking like a pro, no fear, just smiling away. I was struggling to do the hike with trainers. I remember my mum saying “what an inspiration”. He was a very humble and kind human being. The second time I met him was when I was at an event, and again, he just had such a radiant energy about him. He’s one of a kind and I’m blessed to have met him.

He wasn’t just a runner. He was a symbol. A living contradiction to everything we’re taught about age, limits, and when to stop dreaming. And now that he’s gone, it feels like a light has gone out—not just in Punjab or east London, but in the hearts of everyone who saw a bit of themselves in his journey.

Keep ReadingShow less
“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

Minreet with her mother

“Why can’t I just run?”: A south Asian woman’s harrowing harassment story

I was five years old when my parents first signed me up for a mini marathon. They were both keen runners and wanted me to follow in their footsteps. At the time, I hated it. Running felt like punishment — exhausting, uncomfortable, and something I never imagined I’d do by choice.

But one moment changed everything. I was 12, attending a gymnastics competition, and had gone to the car alone to grab my hula hoop. As I walked back, a group of men started shouting at me. They moved closer. I didn’t wait to hear what they had to say — I ran. Fast. My heart was pounding. It was the first time I felt afraid simply for existing in public as a young girl. I never told anyone. But I remember feeling thankful, strangely, that my parents had taught me how to run.

Keep ReadingShow less
Sri Aurobindo

Heehs’s biography is grounded in extensive archival research across France, England, India and Israel

AMG

Sri Aurobindo and the rise of the Asian century

Dinesh Sharma

My friend and colleague, the American historian Peter Heehs, who has lived in Pondicherry, India, for decades, recently published a compelling new biography, The Mother: A Life of Sri Aurobindo’s Collaborator (2025). Heehs previously authored The Lives of Sri Aurobindo (2008), which remains one of the most balanced and scholarly accounts of Aurobindo’s life.

According to Heehs, most previous biographies of the Mother were written for devotees and relied on secondary sources, often presenting her as a divine incarnation without critical engagement. “Such biographies are fine for those who see the Mother as a divine being,” Heehs said, “but they can be off-putting for readers who simply want to understand her life – as an artist, writer, spiritual teacher, and founder of the Ashram and Auroville.”

Keep ReadingShow less