Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Nadia Whittome MP: ‘Offensive race report should be abandoned’

Nadia Whittome MP: ‘Offensive race report should be abandoned’

DP Comment Nadia Whittome byline pic Nadia Whittome

by NADIA WHITTOME, Labour MP for Nottingham East


AT THE end of March, a government-commissioned report into race in the UK was released.

Produced by the Independent Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities, it immediately came under fire from academics, campaigners and MPs for its controversial conclusions.

The report concluded that the UK is not institutionally racist and “no longer” has a system rigged against people from ethnic minorities. It said the success and failure of different communities related to their “culture and attitudes”.

It has even been criticised for glorifying the slave trade with its recommendation to teach a new, more positive, “story” about slavery.

While the government claims the report is independent, it is clear its findings are in line with the Conservatives’ agenda on race.

The government is desperate to whip up a “culture war” – turning different communities against one another – for their own political advantage. It wants to discredit the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement as well as all those who are campaigning for racial justice.

Now academics whose work was included in the report claim their findings were cherry-picked and whitewashed, and one of the commissioners said the government rewrote the report to suit its narrative.

2021 03 31T092813Z 390486910 RC29MM9LKLSP RTRMADP 3 BRITAIN POLITICS RACE The UK government’s commission on race and ethnic disparities was formed by prime minister Boris Johnson in the wake of worldwide Black Lives Matter protests last summer

There is only one place where this report belongs – the bin. It is based on ideology, not evidence. It was biased from start to finish – Munira Mirza, the main driving force in setting up the commission, and Tony Sewell, who led the commission, have both long denied the existence of institutional racism. The report should be abandoned immediately, before the government tries to justify divisive policies based on its findings.

To me, the report is particularly offensive because it denies our experiences as people of colour and blames us for the disadvantages we face. It aims to stop us speaking out against racism by claiming that we are desperate to incorrectly paint ourselves as victims.

No one is denying that progress has been made over the years, but widespread racial injustice and inequality persist today.

The report’s findings are at odds with the data and the numerous examples of barriers and mistreatment we encounter. When applying for jobs, for example, identical CVs get 60 per cent more interviews if your name sounds white British.

There is an increasing wealth gap – Bangladeshi and black African households have around 10p, and Pakistani households around 50p, for every £1 of white British wealth.

Schools have recorded more than 60,000 racist incidents in the past five years, while BAME communities are disproportionately affected by air pollution which impacts our health. The list goes on and on.

Over the last year, the pandemic has highlighted and worsened existing inequalities. A report by Public Health England found that people of Bangladeshi ethnicity are twice as likely to die from Covid-19 than their white British peers, while for other Asian and black ethnicities, it’s 10 to 50 per cent more. Studies have shown that widespread disadvantages faced by these groups – like overcrowded housing and jobs with a higher risk of exposure to the virus – play a large role. Meanwhile, police forces were seven times more likely to fine BAME people during lockdown.

This report was a missed opportunity for change. The BLM protests and calls for greater racial equality prompted Boris Johnson to commission this report in the first place. But all it reveals is that the government cares more about playing politics than improving our lives.

We cannot allow the Tories to distract us from the pain and poverty they have inflicted on so many communities through their policies by downplaying racism and pitting us against one another.

It is action we need, not denial.

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less