NEWLY elected Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman should deliver on his promises, his predecessor John Biggs of the Labour party said while expressing concern over “divisive community politics” in the London borough.
Rahman was stripped of the mayoral position in 2015 and banned from holding political office for five years after an elections court found him guilty of “corrupt and illegal practices” – though he was never found guilty in a criminal court.
His new political party, Aspire, delivered a shock blow to Labour after winning control of Tower Hamlets Council, while Rahman himself won the mayoralty from Biggs.
During the campaigning for the last week’s council election, Aspire apparently focussed on British Bangladeshis who make up nearly a third of Tower Hamlets population, slightly higher than the number of "white British" residents.
"We're potentially quite a divided community. We totally get on quite well together in Tower Hamlets but his campaign was totally focused on one community. His administration is 25 men, all from one community,” Biggs told the BBC.
"I guess that's worrying but it shouldn't be worrying because we're in a multicultural community and everyone should stand up for everyone else, which is what we have tried to do in the Labour Party."
Rahman, who was elected on a manifesto should deliver on his promises, Biggs said, adding that the newly elected mayor would be watched “like a hawk”.
However, Rahman’s spokesman hit back at Biggs, saying his “divisive remarks illustrate why the electorate considered him unfit to lead a multicultural borough…”
Rahman had pledged to scrap controversial Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in Tower Hamlets, freeze council tax in the borough for four years and introduce tough new measures to protect tenants in the private rented sector, according to an LRDS report.
After his victory, Rahman had said in a statement: “As previously, you have rejected the false allegations and embraced my transformative programme, on housing, on education, and the cost of living crisis. Let’s get to work rebuilding our borough and our children’s future.”
The result in Tower Hamlets capped off a mixed bag of results in London for Labour.
Keir Starmer’s party had been elated after winning control of the Tory strongholds of Westminster, Wandsworth and Barnet in the early hours of May 6. But over the weekend Labour went on to lose control of Harrow to the Conservatives and Tower Hamlets to Aspire.
Search
Latest Stories
Start your day right!
Get latest updates and insights delivered to your inbox.
Related News
News
Teachers, nurses warn of strikes over 2.8 per cent pay rise proposal
EasternEye
11 December 2024
More For You
Pilot groups question probe ahead of Air India crash anniversary
Jun 11, 2026
- Pilot groups have criticised the handling of the Air India crash investigation.
- Families of victims are still waiting for answers a year after the disaster.
- Questions remain over why fuel supply to the aircraft's engines was cut off.
- Relatives, lawyers and aviation experts will gather in Ahmedabad on Friday.
INDIA's aviation accident investigation agency is facing renewed criticism from pilot groups ahead of the first anniversary of the 2025 Air India Boeing 787 crash in Ahmedabad, which killed 260 people.
Families of the victims had expected a final report by Friday explaining the cause of the disaster, exactly one year after the Boeing 787-8 crashed shortly after takeoff and hit a medical college.
However, with investigations still continuing, local media reports suggest India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) is expected to issue only an interim report, leaving families and pilot groups waiting for answers.
"I don't have much trust," said Charanvir Randhawa, president of the Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP), which has more than 5,000 members.
"I will be very honest; they are not transparent at all," Randhawa told AFP.
Air India Crash Report Delayed Ahead of Anniversary
His organisation has criticised the composition of the initial investigation team and its decision to question the family of one of the deceased pilots.
'Path toward answers'
On Friday, relatives of the victims will gather in Ahmedabad for a conference organised by lawyers along with aviation and air safety experts to "discuss the path toward answers and safer skies".
A candlelight vigil is also planned in memory of those who died — 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 on the ground.
Among those killed were 200 Indians, 52 British citizens, seven Portuguese nationals and one Canadian.
The only survivor was Briton Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, who told the Press Association news agency that he continued to "live with the significant psychological scars" following the crash, in which his brother died, and "the constant unanswered questions" about why it happened.
"Those questions are not just on my mind -- they are on the minds of every affected family," he said.
"Nothing will ever change what happened, but families deserve clarity."
As required under international law, the AAIB released a preliminary report on July 12, 2025, one month after the crash.
The 15-page report said fuel supply to the aircraft's engines was cut off moments before impact, raising questions about possible pilot error.
'Flawed' report
The report also included a conversation between the captain and co-pilot about the fuel supply being cut off. The two brief sentences led to theories of pilot suicide.
The findings drew criticism because the report did not explain why the fuel switches were turned off or whether the action resulted from pilot error or a malfunction.
Pushkaraj Sabharwal, 91, father of pilot Sumeet Sabharwal, described the report as "profoundly flawed" and filed a petition in India's Supreme Court.
Families of AI 171 crash victims still struggle
He argued it focused on the dead pilots "while failing to examine or eliminate other more plausible technical and procedural causes of the crash".
Randhawa said another inconclusive report could lead to "far more speculations" instead of helping people understand what happened.
"You have to give an indication. Why did the crash occur?"
In May, the FIP submitted a letter to the aviation ministry calling for further investigation to rule out electrical failure.
"Even if they are going to take more than one year, they should say: 'We are still investigating'," he said.
"They should publish the full investigation report."
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less









