Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

A plain English guide to royaldiplomacy

King's speech cloaks a pointed rebuke aimed at Trump

A plain English guide to royaldiplomacy

The King addresses a joint meeting of Congress in the House Chamber at the US Capitol in Washington last Tuesday (28)

xx

WHEN King Charles addressed both houses of the US Congress in Washington on April 28, he quoted Oscar Wilde: “We have really everything in common with America nowadays, except, of course, language.”

US president Donald Trump apparently loved the reference to Wilde: “Great supporter of MAGA, agrees with me we should bomb Iran back into the stone age.”


King Charles was on a four-day state visit to the US to mark the 250th anniversary of American independence from Britain.

It might be helpful, therefore, to decode the King’s words and set out what he really meant.

What the King said: 250 years ago, or, as we say in the United Kingdom ‘just the other day’, they declared independence.

What he meant: American “culture” is work in progress. It still has a touch of the wild west, where disputes are settled by the gun.

What he said: The US Supreme Court Historical Society has calculated that the Magna Carta is cited in at least 160 Supreme Court cases since 1789, not least as the foundation of the principle that executive power is subject to checks and balances.

What he meant: Members of Congress, you’ve got to lock up Trump before he wrecks the global economy. The man is clearly unhinged.

What he said: In both of our countries, it is the very fact of our vibrant, diverse and free societies that give us our collective strength, including to support victims of some of the ills that, so tragically, exist in both our societies today.

What he meant: There’s a lot more to come out about Trump and Jeffrey Epstein.

Greets Donald Trump at the White HouseHenry Nicholls/Getty Images

What he said: Having devoted a large part of my life to interfaith relationships and greater understanding, it is that faith in the triumph of light over darkness which I have found confirmed countless times.

What he meant: Trump’s a bigot.

What he said: The forces of fascism in Europe were on the march (when my grandfather, King George VI, visited the US in 1939), and some time before the United States had joined us in the defence of freedom. Our shared values prevailed. Today, we find ourselves in a new era, but those values remain.

What he meant: Fascism is on the march in America – under Trump.

What he said: Today, Mr Speaker, that same, unyielding resolve is needed for the defence of Ukraine and her most courageous people. It is needed in order to secure a truly just and lasting peace.

What he meant: Trump and JD Vance were boorish in attacking Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office and criminal in blaming the Ukrainian president, the victim, for starting the war with Russia.

What he said: More broadly, we celebrate the $430 billion in annual trade that continues to grow, the $1.7 trillion in mutual investment that fuels that innovation, and the millions of jobs on both sides of the Atlantic supported across both economies. These are strong foundations on which to continue to build, for generations yet unborn.

What he meant: Trump is crazy to impose tariffs on the UK and on countless other countries.

What he said: The natural wonders of the United States of America are indeed a unique asset… Yet even as we celebrate the beauty that surrounds us, our generation must decide how to address the collapse of critical natural systems which threatens far more than the harmony and essential diversity of nature.

What he meant: There is nothing more stupid and dangerous than Trump’s “Drill, baby, drill”. Members of Congress, you’ve got to send in the men in the white coats.

Postscript

The King gifted the president a bell from his second world war submarine namesake, HMS Trump. Perhaps this was a reference to the famous 17th-century phrase by John Donne: “Never send to know for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.”

More For You

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Scottish Labour leader, Anas Sarwar speaks to media infront of the party’s Ad Van Campaign on May 04, 2026 in Bathgate, Scotland

Getty Images

How May elections could disrupt Britain’s political balance

Sunder Katwala

The tremors of the May 2026 elections could shift the tectonic plates of British politics. Attention will quickly turn to the Westminster aftershocks, including what the fallout of these national elections in Scotland and Wales alongside local elections across much of England, mean for Sir Keir Starmer’s future. Yet these seismic electoral upheavals merit scrutiny in their own right.

Wales is set for a once a century political earthquake. Labour has not just led the Welsh government since devolution began in 1999 - but won the most votes in every national election in Wales since 1922. Yet it now trails third, burdened by double incumbency in Cardiff Bay and Westminster, with the party watching the Welsh nationalists of Plaid Cymru and Reform’s pro-Brexit populists compete to top the polls. That contrast has polarised Wales - by age and geography - though a broad majority would prefer a government led by Plaid Cymru’s Rhun Ap Iowerth, with two-thirds hoping to keep Reform out.

Scotland could offer a rare pocket of political stability. John Swinney is the third Scottish first minister of a turbulent term after Nicola Sturgeon and Humza Yousaf, but may now secure a fifth term for his Scottish National Party. The trick to bucking the anti-incumbent trend has been to leverage his Edinburgh government being comparatively less unpopular than its London counterpart. Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar sought to demonstrate his own distance from Westminster by calling for Starmer to resign, but his bid to lead Scotland, and become its second Asian First Minister, looks set to fall short.

Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap IorwerthGetty Images

Keep ReadingShow less