BRITISH prime minister Theresa May expressed regret for the Amritsar atrocity, but stopped short of a full apology on Wednesday (10).
“We deeply regret what happened and the suffering caused,” she said in the House of Commons at the start of Prime Minister's Questions, as India marks the 100th anniversary of the killings this weekend.
In response, Jeremy Corbyn, leader of the main opposition Labour Party, called for “a full, clear, and unequivocal apology”.
This weekend marks 100 years since British Indian Army troops, instructed by Brigadier General Reginald Dyer, fired upon Indians gathered at Jallianwala Bagh, killing hundreds of people and injuring many more.
The events of April 13, 1919, marked a turning point in India’s freedom struggle, and in the run-up to the centenary this week, there have been calls from prominent personalities both in India and the UK for an apology from Britain.
May's remarks come after a senior minister said the government should do more to acknowledge the brutality of Jallianwala Bagh.
On Tuesday (9), Mark Field addressed MPs in Westminster as they discussed an apology from the UK government on the centenary of the killing of hundreds of Indians by the British in Amritsar.
Field, minister for the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO), promised MPs in Westminster Hall that he would discuss the issue with prime minister Theresa May and the foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt.
He also told MPs that an “active debate” was taking place between senior ministers and the British high commissioner, Sir Dominic Asquith, in New Delhi, but did not elaborate.
Field said: “[The Amritsar massacre] was a shameful episode in our history and one we deeply regret to this day.
“I understand [our modern relationship] with India is framed by the past …I will take this to the foreign secretary and Downing Street [and relay the] sense that we do need to do a little more than the deep regrets that I have set out today.”
Although many politicians, including former prime minister David Cameron, have expressed
sympathy for the 1919 atrocity, an apology has not been offered.
Field confirmed that a representative from the British high commission in India would lay a
wreath at the Jallianwala Bagh Martyrs’ memorial on behalf of the UK government.
He added that the government was also “committed to ensuring what happened in Amritsar was never forgotten”.
Tuesday’s debate, which was sponsored by Conservative MP Bob Blackman, was attended by several politicians who all urged the British government to apologise for the horrific events of that day.
Speaking to Eastern Eye ahead of the debate, Blackman said he felt it was the right time for the government to apologise.
“After 100 years, although we should have done this beforehand, it is a good time to put our hands up and acknowledge such a terrible event and say sorry,” the Tory MP said.
Blackman, who visited the Jallianwala Bagh memorial site in 2016, called for British ministers to attend commemorate events in India to mark the milestone and also meet family members of those affected in the incident.
Describing the event as the “worst scandal in our relationship with India during the British administration”, Blackman said few people in the UK were aware of the massacre.
He admitted that he too was not fully aware of the tragedy before his visit. “[The lack of knowledge in the country] prompted me to seek a debate so we can get the government to do something,” the Harrow East MP, whose constituents include a large number of Indians, said.
Among MPs who spoke during the debate were Preet Gill, the first female British Sikh MP.
Speaking on behalf of the APPG (All Party Parliamentary Group) for British Sikhs, Gill said it was not enough to simply condemn the incident and express shame.
“The UK government should show respect to the worldwide Sikh community and have
the courage to give a full apology for the massacre,” the Labour MP from Birmingham said.
Fellow British-Asian MPs Virendra Sharma and Khalid Mahmood have also urged the government to apologise.
Labour MP for Brent North and shadow secretary for international trade, Barry Gardiner, said unless Britain acknowledged historic events, “we will be unable to learn from the errors we have made or to build a positive future with those we have harmed”.
“Time allows some wounds to heal, but others to fester. A century on from this most egregious and murderous act, an official government apology to the government and people of India is both appropriate and necessary,” Gardiner, who is also the chair of the Labour Friends of India, said.
Meanwhile, India’s federal minister Hardeep Singh Puri said some expression of regret by Britain would help bring closure over the atrocity.
Claiming that his maternal grandfather was present at the scene and was injured, Puri said
the shooting showed the “real character of British colonialism and the colonial rule”.
“Some expression of regret – I don’t know what form it takes,” he said. “But as a proud Sikh and as a very proud Indian, for anyone who has read about this tragedy, I think some expression of regret will help in getting closure.”
The Amritsar massacre, carried out under the command of Dyer, remains a source of tension between the UK and India. Pressure from campaigners and politicians has long been put on the UK government to acknowledge the actions of the British army in 1919.
Most recently, in February, a debate in the House of Lords asked the government if they
planned to issue an apology on the centenary.
Several peers, including Baroness Sandip Verma, Lord Meghnad Desai and Lord Karan Bilimoria, took part in the discussion.
An FCO spokesperson told Eastern Eye: “The government rightly condemned the incident at
the time – secretary of state for war Winston Churchill called it ‘a monstrous event… which stands in singular and sinister isolation’.”
They also noted that the Queen and Cameron had both previously expressed deep regret on visits to Jallianwala Bagh.
Cameron called the event as “a deeply shameful event in British history” when he visited in 2013.
According to a government source, although no official trip to India is planned for Hunt, he is
Newly appointed home secretary Shabana Mahmood arrives at Number 10 at Downing Street as Keir Starmer holds a cabinet reshuffle on September 5, 2025. (Photo: Getty Images)
The King approved a series of new appointments on Friday. David Lammy becomes lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice, and will also serve as deputy prime minister. Yvette Cooper has been named secretary of state for foreign, commonwealth and development affairs.
Mahmood moves from justice secretary to the Home Office. Lisa Nandy will stay on as culture secretary despite months of speculation about her future.
Steve Reed is the new secretary of state for housing, communities and local government. Pat McFadden has been appointed secretary of state for work and pensions.
Peter Kyle is the new secretary of state for business and trade and president of the Board of Trade. Liz Kendall takes over as secretary of state for science, innovation and technology. Emma Reynolds becomes secretary of state for environment, food and rural affairs. Douglas Alexander has been named secretary of state for Scotland.
Jonathan Reynolds has been appointed parliamentary secretary to the Treasury (chief whip) and will sit in cabinet. Sir Alan Campbell becomes lord president of the council and leader of the House of Commons, and will also attend cabinet.
Darren Jones has been appointed chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and will continue as chief secretary to the prime minister.
Angela Rayner, Lucy Powell and Ian Murray have left the government.
Rayner resigned earlier after admitting she had underpaid stamp duty on a seaside flat. In a letter to Starmer, ethics chief Laurie Magnus said Rayner had failed to "heed the caution" of legal advice and considered the ministerial code to have been breached.
"I accept that I did not meet the highest standards," Rayner wrote in her resignation letter, adding she would also step down as housing minister and deputy leader of the Labour Party. "I deeply regret my decision to not seek additional specialist tax advice. I take full responsibility for this error."
In his reply, Starmer said he was "very sad" to see her leave government but added: "You will remain a major figure in our party."
Rayner confirmed she had underpaid stamp duty following reports that she had saved £40,000 ($53,000) by removing her name from the deeds of another property.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
The protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping triggered a series of demonstrations across the country during heightened tensions over immigration. (Photo: Getty Images)
AN ETHIOPIAN asylum seeker, whose arrest in July led to protests outside a hotel near London where he and other migrants were housed, has been found guilty of sexually assaulting a teenage girl and another woman.
The protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, about 20 miles (30 km) from London, triggered a series of demonstrations across the country during heightened tensions over immigration.
Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu was convicted at Chelmsford Magistrates' Court of sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl and a woman. He was also found guilty of attempting to sexually assault the girl, inciting her to engage in sexual activity, and harassment.
"This was an incident which became a cause of deep concern for the local community," said prosecutor Rebecca Mundy.
Immigration has become the main political issue in Britain, overtaking concerns about the economy, with record numbers of asylum claims and migrant arrivals by small boats across the Channel.
Prosecutors said that on July 7 the girl had offered Kebatu pizza because he looked hungry. He then tried to kiss her, touched her thigh, said he wanted a baby with her and her friend, and invited them back to the hotel.
The next day, when the girl was in her school uniform, he again attempted to kiss her.
District Judge Christopher Williams said the girl’s evidence was consistent and he did not believe she or other witnesses fabricated their accounts.
Kebatu, who had moved to the Bell Hotel about a week before the incident, denied the charges, telling the court he was "not a wild animal".
The asylum seeker said he was a teacher in Ethiopia and claimed the woman had given him her phone number and repeatedly invited him to her home.
His arrest sparked protests outside the hotel, some of which turned violent. The local council obtained a temporary injunction to prevent asylum seekers from being housed there, but it was overturned last week after a government appeal.
Opposition politicians accused prime minister Keir Starmer of prioritising migrants’ rights over those of local residents.
Government data shows that just over 32,000 migrants were housed in hotels across the UK as of the end of June. The government has said it will end the practice before the next election, scheduled for 2029.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Rayner, 45, announced she would step down as deputy prime minister, housing minister and deputy leader of the Labour Party. (Photo: Getty Image)
Rayner steps down after admitting underpaying property tax
Resigns as deputy prime minister, housing minister and Labour deputy leader
Becomes eighth minister to leave Starmer’s government, and the most senior so far
Her departure comes as Labour trails Reform UK in opinion polls
DEPUTY prime minister Angela Rayner resigned on Friday after admitting she had underpaid property tax on a new home. Her resignation is a fresh setback for prime minister Keir Starmer, who had initially stood by her.
Rayner, 45, announced she would step down as deputy prime minister, housing minister and deputy leader of the Labour Party. She becomes the eighth minister to leave Starmer’s team, and the most senior departure so far.
"I deeply regret my decision to not seek additional specialist tax advice... I take full responsibility for this error," Rayner wrote in her resignation letter to Starmer.
Starmer said he was very sad her time in government had ended in this way but that she had made the right decision.
Labour under pressure in polls
The resignation comes as Labour trails Reform UK in opinion polls. Starmer has already faced criticism over his party’s image, with accusations of hypocrisy linked to accepting costly gifts such as clothing and concert tickets from donors.
Rayner’s exit is seen as a major blow, as she had played a key role in keeping Labour’s left and centrist factions together and was considered more broadly popular than Starmer himself.
From potential successor to resignation
Rayner had been mentioned as a possible successor to Starmer. On Wednesday, she referred herself to the independent adviser on ministerial standards after acknowledging a mistake in her tax payment.
In an interview, Rayner appeared close to tears as she explained that she had set up a trust for one of her sons, who has lifelong disabilities caused by an injury. She sold her share of her family home in northern England to the trust, using the money to buy an apartment in Hove. She believed she did not need to pay the higher tax rate for a second home.
Rayner’s departure adds to a series of losses for Starmer’s government. Eight ministers have now resigned, five over wrongdoing. This is the highest number of ministerial resignations outside cabinet reshuffles for any prime minister at the start of their tenure since at least 1979.
Even Boris Johnson, who later faced widespread criticism over lockdown-breaking parties, saw fewer resignations at the same stage.
Challenges ahead for Starmer
The resignation leaves Starmer weakened as he faces the end of the year, when his government must prepare a budget that is expected to include further tax rises. At the same time, Nigel Farage’s Reform is mounting a growing challenge.
Starmer had hoped to signal a new phase of leadership with a reshuffle on Monday after returning from his summer break. But that effort was overtaken by the allegations against Rayner and by Farage’s claim that the prime minister was stifling free speech.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Migrants swim to board a smugglers' boat in order to attempt crossing the English channel off the beach of Audresselles, northern France. (Photo: Getty Images)
Refugee family reunion scheme suspended as part of migration reforms
Nearly 21,000 visas issued in the past year, mainly to women and children
New rules to include contribution requirements and longer waiting periods
Government expects first migrant returns to France later this month
THE GOVERNMENT has announced it is suspending a scheme that allowed families of refugees in the UK to apply to join their relatives, as part of efforts to cut irregular migration.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper told parliament on Monday that new applications under the refugee family reunion route would be “temporarily” paused while the system is reformed.
“We do need to address the immediate pressures on local authorities and the risks from criminal gangs using family reunion as a pull factor to encourage more people onto dangerous boats,” she said.
Nearly 21,000 visas issued in a year
Home Office figures released earlier this month showed almost 21,000 refugee family reunion visas were granted in the year to June 2025. The majority were issued to women and children.
Cooper said the suspension is ahead of wider reforms due later this year. These will examine “contribution requirements” for family members and “longer periods before newly granted refugees can apply”.
“Until the new framework is introduced, refugees will be covered by the same family migration rules and conditions as everyone else,” she said.
Immigration concerns rising
An Ipsos survey published last month found immigration is currently the top concern for Britons, ahead of the economy and the National Health Service.
Over 111,000 people applied for asylum in the UK in the year to June 2025, the highest number since records began in 2001, according to Home Office data.
Since Keir Starmer became prime minister in July 2024, more than 50,000 migrants have crossed the Channel from northern France. Similar crossings also took place under the previous Conservative government.
The arrivals have fuelled discontent that has been tapped into by Reform UK, led by Nigel Farage, which has overtaken Labour in national opinion polls.
Deal with France
Cooper said the government expects to return the first migrants to France “later this month” under a new agreement.
Under the “one-in, one-out” deal, the UK can send back to France some migrants who crossed the Channel, while accepting the same number of migrants from France who can apply for a visa through an online system. Priority will be given to vulnerable nationalities and those with ties in Britain.
“We expect the first returns to begin later this month,” Cooper said.
“Applications have also been opened for the reciprocal legal route, with the first cases under consideration subject to strict security checks,” she added.
Reform’s challenge to Labour
Reform UK has led Labour in opinion polls for several months, though the next general election is not due until 2029.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
Angela Rayner arrives for a cabinet meeting at Downing Street on September 2, 2025. (Photo credit: Reuters)
DEPUTY prime minister Angela Rayner is awaiting the outcome of an investigation into her underpayment of stamp duty on a property in East Sussex, with the findings expected soon.
Prime minister Keir Starmer said he anticipated the report, led by ethics adviser Sir Laurie Magnus, would be delivered “pretty quickly.” He added: “Then, of course, I will act on whatever the report is that's put in front of me.”
Rayner admitted she did not pay the correct tax on an £800,000 flat in Hove. She paid £30,000 in stamp duty after listing it as her main residence. However, as she co-owned another property, she should have paid the higher “second home” rate of £70,000, according to BBC.
The Times reported that Rayner’s lawyers said they had not given her any tax advice and were being made “scapegoats,” contradicting her earlier claim that she had acted on advice.
BBC reported that her allies said she had consulted a conveyancer and two trust law experts.
Starmer’s spokesperson condemned vandalism at Rayner’s Hove property, where “tax evader” had been spray-painted.
“Whatever scrutiny our parliamentarians may face, it is appalling that their private homes should be targeted in this way,” the spokesperson said.