Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Islamophobia must be eradicated from our Tolerant Britain

By Qari Asim, MBE

Senior Imam, Makkah Mosque Leeds


The vile attack on Muslims returning from Finsbury Park mosque after late night prayers is appalling. This was a pre-meditated attack on Muslims. According to witnesses, the attacker Darren Osborne shouted, “I want to kill all Muslims” as he drove a van into a crowd of Muslim.

This attack epitomizes the toxic ultra-nationalist far right sentiments that have been on the rise in recent years. As an independent member of the government’s Anti-Muslim Hatred Working Group, I am deeply concerned about the rise in anti-Muslim sentiments year on year.

The recent figures released by the London mayor show that there has been fivefold increase in Islamophobic attacks since the atrocity at London Bridge. The recent rise in anti-Muslim attacks and the severity of their nature shows that far right extremist groups have been successful in radicalising people against Muslims.

It is reported that Osborne's views about Muslims changed since the London Bridge terror attack. Over the weekend, Osborne had called a 12-year-old Muslim neighbour an “inbred” and had been thrown out of a local pub for getting drunk, “cursing Muslims and saying he would do some damage”.

We need to consider who radicalised Osborne and the murderer of Jo Cox, Mohammad Saleem and so forth? Was Osborne emboldened by reckless anti-Muslim rhetoric adopted by populist leaders and parts of the  media?

The politics of hatred against Muslims is not restricted to the far right fascists only. Some populist leaders and parts of the media have not been openly challenged when referring to Muslims as the enemy within or a “fifth column”, allowing the term “Muslim” to become synonymous with “extremist”.

Instead, parts of the media often use inflammatory headlines and often blur the lines between Muslims and Islamist extremists when reported an ISIS related terror attack. Some newspaper headlines have referred to Osborne as “jobless lone-wolf”  rather than a terrorist, extremist or even a murderer. Such reckless or deliberate attempt to treat both of extremism differently or to normalise of hostility towards Islam and Muslims has been feeding into a dangerous cauldron of broader discontent  towards Muslims.

Britain is one of the most tolerant countries in the world. There is a tradition of religious and intellectual freedom. Muslims have the religious freedom to build monumental mosques and can proudly observe their faith under the law. It is a country where you can be a Muslim and the Lord Mayor of London,  wear a headscarf and become the Queen of the Great Bake-Off.

However, I am appalled by the growing threat posed by fascist groups to our values and our society is abhorrent. Far-right extremism is now much more than a political irritant. For too long we as a society have not treated far right extremism as a threat to our values and freedoms. For too long we have allowed Islamophobia to flourish. We allowed such rhetoric to be used about Muslims which will be, quite rightly, completely unacceptable towards other minorities. Daesh (the Islamic State group) and far right extremists are both driven by the same motivations and desires, a worldview that hates tolerance and diversity. These extremists believe in asserting their own supremacy.

There is a need to fully recognise white supremacist far right extremist ideology, and their peddling of hatred towards Muslims. Otherwise, there will be more horrific attacks like this one. This is not the first time that an individual who has far right extremist tendencies has murdered an innocent person in our country. A neo-Nazi terrorist murdered Mohammed Saleem in 2013 in Birmingham, and in 2015 Mohsin Khan was attacked in Rotherham, which resulted in his death.

These neo-Nazi extremists have attacked mosques around the country and have even planted bombs in mosques. Following the Manchester attack last month, arsonists set fire to an Oldham mosque and a mosque in Stockton-on-Tees was defaced with graffiti. Muslim women have on many occasions been the victim of physical or verbal attacks, including a pregnant women losing her baby in a violent attack while shopping in the supermarket.

The day after the atrocity in Finsbury Park, Prime Minister Theresa May said that attack on Muslims was “every bit as insidious and destructive to our values and our way of life” as the recent string of terror attacks apparently motivated by Daesh ideology. The home secretary, Amber Rudd, has also reassured Muslims that they will be protected. Now we need to move from words to actions. We now not only need to accept that far right extremism is a threat to our society but take clear and robust actions against those who peddle hatred against Muslims and incite violence against them.

British Muslims are not the "enemy combatant", as the leader of a far right-right movement refers to them rather citizens who care about their fellow Britons. After literally running down many of their fellow Muslims, Osborne found protection -not revenge - at the hands of a group of Muslims and an imam at the mosque, who heroically protected him, while waiting for the police to arrive. Those who portray Muslims as the enemy within, should be publicly held accountable. Unless we treat all acts of terrorism and extremism, hatred and bigotry - on both sides - in the same way and strive for a culture of respect for all, we will not be making our streets any safer.

Qari Muhammad Asim MBE is chief Imam at Leeds’ Makkah mosque and a senior lawyer at global law firm, DLA Piper. He is an independent member of the Government’s Anti-Muslim Hatred working group, a trustee of British Future and senior editor of https://www.imamsonline.com/, a platform promoting mainstream Islamic voices and combating online radicalisation.

The imam is an advisor to the Mosques & Imams National Advisory Board (MINAB) and an executive member of the British Muslim Forum.

He tweets at @QariAsim

More For You

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

King Charles III, patron of the Royal Horticultural Society, walks through the RHS and BBC Radio 2 Dog Garden during a visit to the RHS Chelsea Flower Show at Royal Hospital Chelsea on May 20, 2025 in London, England.

Getty Images

Chelsea Flower Show highlights Royal-inspired roses and eco-friendly innovation

Rashmita Solanki

This particular year at the Royal Horticultural Society’s Chelsea Flower Show, there have been two members of the Royal Family who have had roses named after them.

‘The King’s Rose’, named after King Charles III, and ‘Catherine’s Rose’, named after Catherine, Princess of Wales. Both roses have been grown by two of the most well-known rose growers in the United Kingdom.

Keep ReadingShow less
‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

The growing number of working-age adults not in jobs places a huge financial burden on Britain, according to recent reports

‘Going Dutch may be a solution to get the UK’s jobless into work’

Dr Nik Kotecha

ECONOMIC inactivity is a major obstacle to the UK’s productivity and competitiveness.

As a business owner and employer with over 30 years of experience, I have seen firsthand how this challenge has intensified as the economically inactive population approaches 10 million nationally - almost one million more than pre-pandemic.

Keep ReadingShow less
Understanding the Hindu Psyche: Averse to Confrontation?

Artistic depiction of Arjuna and Krishna with the chariot

Is Hindu psyche averse to confrontation?

Nitin Mehta

Over 5,000 years ago, on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, two armies comprising tens of thousands of men were ready to begin a war. The Pandavs were led by Arjuna, a warrior whose archery skills were unbeatable. At the last minute, before the war was to commence, Arjuna put down his weapons and declared to Krishna his decision not to fight. He reasoned that the war would kill tens of thousands of people all for a kingdom. It took the whole of the Bhagavad Gita to convince Arjuna to fight.

Even after Krishna destroyed all his doubts, Arjuna asked to see Krishna in his form as a supreme God. In short, Arjuna wanted to avoid confrontation at any cost.

Keep ReadingShow less
How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

The mainstream print media in India, both in English and regional languages, has remained largely responsible and sober

How Indian news channels used fake stories and AI to grab attention

MISINFORMATION and disinformation are not new in the age of social media, but India’s mainstream news channels peddling them during a time of war was a new low.

Hours after India launched Operation Sindoor, most channels went into overdrive with ‘breaking news’ meant to shock, or worse, excite.

Keep ReadingShow less
war and peace

A vivid depiction of the Kurukshetra battlefield, where Arjuna and Krishna stand amidst the chaos, embodying the eternal conflict between duty and morality

Artvee

War and Peace are two sides of the same coin

Nitin Mehta

War and peace have exercised the minds of human beings for as far back as history goes. It is no wonder then that the Mahabharata war, which took place over 5,000 years ago, became a moment of intense discussion between Lord Krishna and Arjuna.

Hundreds of thousands of people on either side were ready to begin battle on the site of Kurukshetra. Seeing the armies and his near and dear combatants, Arjuna lost the will to fight. How could he fight his grandfather Bhisma and his guru Dronacharya? He asked Krishna what all the bloodshed would achieve.

Keep ReadingShow less