INDIA and Pakistan both dispatched top parliamentarians to press their cases in the UK and US, where president Donald Trump showed eagerness for diplomacy between them.
After crisscrossing the world, the delegations were last week at the same time in Washington, which said it played a mediatory role in a ceasefire after four days of fighting between India and Pakistan in May.
In similar strategies, the delegations are both led by veteran politicians who have been critical of their countries’ governments and are known for their ease in speaking to Western audiences.
Pakistan embraced an active role for the Trump administration while India, which has close relations with Washington, has been more circumspect and has long refused outside mediation over Kashmir.
“Just like the United States and president Trump played a role in encouraging us to achieve this ceasefire, I believe they should play their part in encouraging both sides to engage in a comprehensive dialogue,” said Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, of the Pakistan People’s Party, which says it belongs neither to the governing coalition nor opposition.
“I don’t quite understand the Indian government’s hesitance,” he told AFP.
“I’m the first to criticise the United States for so many reasons, but where they do the right thing, where they do the difficult task of actually achieving a ceasefire, they deserve appreciation.”
India’s delegation was led by one of its most prominent opposition politicians, Shashi Tharoor, a former senior UN official and writer.
He said he was putting the national interest first, despite disagreements domestically with prime minister Narendra Modi.
Tharoor said he heard “total support and solidarity for India” during his meetings with US lawmakers and a “complete understanding of India’s right to defend itself against terrorism.”
“There can be no equivalence between a country sending terrorists and a country having its civilians killed – holiday-makers, tourists, men shot down in front of their wives and children after being asked their religion,” Tharoor told a news conference.
He said he was “puzzled” by those who believe denials of responsibility by Pakistan, pointing to how US forces found Osama bin Laden in the country.
Tharoor also noted that former Pakistani president Asif Ali Zardari – Bilawal’s father – had advocated peace with India, but was in power during the siege of Mumbai on November 26, 2008.
“If they can’t control what they’re doing to us, why bother to talk to them?” said Tharoor, who pointed to the outsized role of the military in Pakistan.
Trump has repeatedly credited his administration with averting nuclear war and said the United States had negotiated an agreement to hold talks between the two sides at a neutral site, an assertion that met India’s silence.
Pakistan had cool relations with Trump’s predecessor Joe Biden, whose aides bitterly resented Islamabad’s role in the Afghanistan war, but Pakistan has quickly worked to woo Trump including with the arrest of a suspect in a deadly 2021 attack that killed more than 170 people, including 13 US troops, during the withdrawal from Kabul.
Bilawal – recalling how his mother, former prime minister Benazir Bhutto, was killed in an attack – said Pakistan was ready to discuss terrorism with India, but that Kashmir as a “root cause” also needed to be on the table.
He said India was establishing a dangerous precedent in south Asia where whenever there is a terrorist attack in any country, “you go straight to war.”
“I think that the fate of 1.7 billion people and our two great nations should not be left in the hands of these nameless, faceless, non-state actors and this new normal that India is trying to impose on the region,” he said.
Pakistan’s former foreign secretary, Jalil Abbas Jilani, a member of the delegation, said, “Our message was clear – Pakistan seeks peace.”
Jilani said Islamabad sought the resolution of all issues with India, including the Indus Waters Treaty, through dialogue. Lawmaker Khurram Dastgir highlighted the regional impact of the water dispute and called for the restoration of the 1960 World Bank-mediated treaty, which India said remained in abeyance until Islamabad ended its support for cross-border terrorism.
“We explained to US officials that India’s suspension of the treaty endangers livelihood of 240 million people and undermines the region’s stability,” he said.
Dastgir stressed the water dispute was a matter of survival for Pakistan.
Senator Sherry Rehman, another member of the group, said the mission was focused on advocating for peace and ensuring the water treaty and Kashmir issue remained on the international agenda.
Trump links India’s high tariffs and trade barriers to new punitive measures.
He warned of an unspecified “penalty” over India’s defence and energy ties with Russia.
Trade talks between the US and India have stalled over market access disagreements.
US PRESIDENT Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that imports from India will face a 25 per cent tariff. He also mentioned an unspecified "penalty" for New Delhi’s purchases of Russian weapons and energy.
The new tariffs will take effect on Friday, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.
"Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary trade barriers of any country," Trump said.
Trump cites trade deficit
In another post, Trump wrote in all caps that the United States has a "massive" trade deficit with India.
He said India has "always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE."
Trump did not give details of the penalty he referred to for India’s trade with Russia.
Measures linked to Russia-Ukraine conflict
The announcement comes as the 79-year-old Republican has indicated plans to increase US pressure on Moscow to stop the fighting in Ukraine and negotiate a peace deal.
On Tuesday, Trump said he was giving Russian president Vladimir Putin 10 days to change course in Ukraine or face unspecified punishment.
"We're going to put on tariffs and stuff," he said, but added, "I don't know if it's going to effect Russia because obviously he wants to keep the war going."
India, the world’s most populous country, was among the first major economies to start broader trade talks with Washington.
However, after six months, Trump’s wide-ranging demands and India’s reluctance to fully open its agricultural and dairy sectors have prevented a deal that would protect it from punitive tariffs.
On Tuesday, Trump had said India could face a 20–25 per cent rate since no trade deal had been finalised. The announced tariffs will significantly increase from the current 10 per cent baseline tariff on Indian shipments to the US.
Wider global tariff threats
Trump has aimed to reshape the global economy by using US economic power to pressure trading partners with tariffs and push foreign companies to move operations to the United States.
Talks are ongoing with the European Union, China, Canada and other major partners.
He has also warned that dozens of other countries could face higher tariffs from Friday unless they strike trade deals. Among them is Brazil, which Trump has threatened with 50 per cent import tariffs, partly to pressure the country to halt the trial of former president Jair Bolsonaro on coup charges.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Indian officials continue to remain hopeful of concluding a wider agreement by September or October, based on discussions between prime minister Narendra Modi and Trump in February. (Photo: iStock)
THE CHANCES of India and the United States reaching an interim trade agreement before the August 1 deadline have reduced, as negotiations remain stuck over tariff cuts on key agricultural and dairy products, two Indian government sources told Reuters.
US president Donald Trump had threatened a 26 per cent tariff on Indian imports in April but put it on hold to allow talks to continue. The pause ends on August 1. India, however, has not yet received a formal tariff letter, unlike more than 20 other countries.
India’s trade team, led by chief negotiator Rajesh Agrawal, recently returned from Washington after the fifth round of discussions without any breakthrough.
“An interim deal before August 1 looks difficult, though virtual discussions are ongoing,” one of the Indian government sources said. The source added that a US delegation was expected to visit New Delhi soon to carry forward the talks.
According to Reuters, the negotiations have stalled because New Delhi is unwilling to open up its agriculture and dairy sectors, while Washington has not agreed to India’s request to reduce higher tariffs on steel, aluminium and automobiles.
Officials are now considering whether some of these unresolved issues can be taken up later, after a limited agreement is signed, the second government source said.
Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations, said sectors like gems and jewellery could be affected if 26 per cent tariffs are imposed. “However, this could be temporary, as both countries aim to sign the deal over time,” he said.
US treasury secretary Scott Bessent told CNBC on Monday that the Trump administration prioritised the quality of trade agreements over timelines. Asked whether the August 1 deadline could be extended for countries still in talks, he said it was for Trump to decide.
Indian officials continue to remain hopeful of concluding a wider agreement by September or October, based on discussions between prime minister Narendra Modi and Trump in February.
“Given that there have been five rounds of negotiations and another US delegation is expected, we remain optimistic about finalising a trade pact,” a third Indian government source said.
The Indian commerce ministry and the Office of the United States Trade Representative did not respond to emailed requests for comment.
(With inputs from Reuters)
Keep ReadingShow less
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said TRF is a 'front and proxy' of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a UN-designated terrorist group based in Pakistan. (Photo: Getty Images)
THE UNITED STATES on Thursday designated The Resistance Front (TRF), the group blamed for the April attack in Kashmir, as a terrorist organisation. The attack had triggered the worst conflict between India and Pakistan in decades.
US secretary of state Marco Rubio said TRF is a "front and proxy" of Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), a UN-designated terrorist group based in Pakistan.
The designation "demonstrates the Trump administration's commitment to protecting our national security interests, countering terrorism, and enforcing President (Donald) Trump's call for justice for the Pahalgam attack," Rubio said in a statement.
In April, gunmen shot dead 26 people, most of them Hindus, in Pahalgam, a tourist area in the Indian-administered region of Kashmir.
Survivors told reporters that the gunmen had separated women and children and ordered some of the men to recite the Muslim declaration of faith.
India's foreign minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar said on Friday that the US decision was a "strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation", writing on X (formerly Twitter).
A strong affirmation of India-US counter-terrorism cooperation.
Appreciate @SecRubio and @StateDept for designating TRF—a Lashkar-e-Tayyiba (LeT) proxy—as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). It claimed responsibility for the… — Dr. S. Jaishankar (@DrSJaishankar) July 18, 2025
Little was previously known about TRF, which initially claimed responsibility for the Pahalgam killings.
As criticism grew over the attack, the group later retracted its claim.
India has listed TRF as a terrorist group, and the India-based Observer Research Foundation think tank has described it as "a smokescreen and an offshoot of LeT".
New Delhi has accused Pakistan of being involved in the attack, a claim denied by Islamabad.
The violence in Pahalgam led to four days of fighting between India and Pakistan, leaving more than 70 people dead on both sides. It was the worst military standoff between the two countries since 1999.
Keep ReadingShow less
Trump’s administration has been working on trade deals ahead of an August 1 deadline, when duties on most US imports are scheduled to rise again. (Photo: Getty Images)
THE US is very close to finalising a trade agreement with India, while a deal with the European Union is also possible, president Donald Trump said in an interview aired on Real America's Voice on Wednesday. However, he said it was too soon to tell if an agreement could be reached with Canada.
Trump’s administration has been working on trade deals ahead of an August 1 deadline, when duties on most US imports are scheduled to rise again. The push is part of efforts to secure what Trump considers better trade terms and reduce the large US trade deficit.
"We're very close to India, and ... we could possibly make a deal with (the) EU," Trump said when asked about upcoming trade agreements.
Trump’s comments came as EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic travelled to Washington on Wednesday for discussions on tariffs. An Indian trade delegation also arrived in Washington on Monday for fresh negotiations.
"(The) European Union has been brutal, and now they're being very nice. They want to make a deal, and it'll be a lot different than the deal that we've had for years," Trump said.
On Canada, which has said it is preparing countermeasures if talks do not lead to an agreement, Trump said: "Too soon to say."
His remarks echoed the view of Canadian prime minister Mark Carney, who said earlier on Wednesday that a deal that works for Canadian workers was not yet on the table.
Trump also said he would probably impose a blanket 10 per cent or 15 per cent tariff on smaller countries.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
A new survey shows growing cultural and emotional ties to India among US-born Indian Americans.
A NEW report has shown that Indian Americans born in the United States are displaying stronger identification with their Indian heritage than in previous years.
The 2024 Indian American Attitudes Survey by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, conducted online with 1,206 respondents, found that 86 per cent of US-born Indian Americans said that being Indian is “very” or “somewhat” important to them. This marks an increase from 70 per cent in 2020. The share who considered their Indian identity as “not too important” or “not important at all” dropped from 30 to 15 per cent.
The report, titled Indian Americans: A Social Portrait, was published in June 2025 and draws on data collected between September and October 2024.
Shifts in self-identification
The report notes a decline in the use of the term “Indian American” as a primary identity. In 2020, 43 per cent identified as “Indian American,” while in 2024, this dropped to 26 per cent.
Meanwhile, 22 per cent now identify as “Asian Indian,” 20 per cent as “Indian,” and 14 per cent as “Asian American.”
Among US-born Indian Americans, nearly half said they feel equally Indian and American.
Twenty-four per cent said they feel more Indian than American, and another 24 per cent said they feel more American than Indian.
In 2020, 31 per cent had said they felt more American than Indian, and 19 per cent had said they felt more Indian than American.
Cultural connections remain strong
The survey found that 81 per cent of Indian Americans said they had eaten Indian food in the past month.
Sixty-five per cent said they had watched Indian television or movies in the same period.
Thirty-eight per cent said they had participated in or enjoyed Indian dance, music, or art in the past six months.
Only 7 per cent said they had done none of these activities.
Ongoing ties with India
Fifty-five per cent of respondents said they communicate with friends or family in India at least once a month.
Thirty-nine per cent reported having travelled to India in the past year.