Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Imran disappoints at Davos  

By Amit Roy


LAURENCE FOX is not the only one whose history needs a little brushing up. Pakistan prime minister Imran Khan’s grasp of the history of Kashmir appears to be one fed to him by the Pakistani military.

Imran was interviewed for Radio 4’s Today programme by Mishal Husain in Davos. He wanted to only talk Kashmir, but she asked about the incarceration of thousands of Chinese Muslims in Xinjiang.

“At the moment, I did not know enough about it,” he replied. “If I have, we will speak to the Chinese privately because that’s how the Chinese are.”

This is not a defence of Indian prime minister Narendra Modi’s Kashmir policy or his Citizenship (Amendment) Act or the National Register of Citizens, which have been met with protests across India.

But negotiations between Pakistan and India are not going to be helped by Imran comparing the Modi government to the Nazis. On nearly the eve of Holocaust Day, his comments were unworthy of a head of government.

Imran launched into a familiar rant on Kashmir, accompanied with the implied threat of nuclear war.

Unfortunately for him, he is seen more as a mouthpiece for the generals and not taken too seriously. If he were, the US, which has not forgotten where Osama bin Laden found shelter, would wonder about Pakistan’s possession of nuclear weapons.

India and Pakistan should talk about trade and peopleto-people contact, not Kashmir, which will remain divided along the Line of Control.

More For You

Reeves tax plan

Sir Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves

Reeves faces calls to resign over tax plan

IF ONLY voters had listened to Rishi Sunak last year, the economy would today have been in a much healthier state. Inflation was about two per cent when he was oust­ed from office. As chancellor, Rachel Reeves has managed to double that.

The Daily Telegraph wants Reeves to re­sign, allegedly because she misled the coun­try. She claimed the economy faced a black hole of £20–30 billion, but it has now emerged that Richard Hughes, chair of the indepen­dent Office for Budget Responsibility, told Reeves that “at no point” she faced a shortfall of more than £2.5bn. Hughes also confirmed that on October 31, the OBR upgraded its forecasts and told the chancellor that she, in fact, had a £4.2bn surplus. In other words, she stands accused of lying in order to justify her decision to raise taxes by £26bn.

Keep ReadingShow less