Humza Yousaf has refuted any suggestion that he was deceived by Michael Matheson regarding the iPad data billing controversy. Nevertheless, Yousaf acknowledged that Matheson could have handled the situation better.
Defending the health secretary, Matheson, the first minister described him as a “man of integrity,” as speculation about a possible vote of no confidence against Matheson emerges in Holyrood, The Times reported.
Matheson confessed last Thursday (16) that his teenage sons had utilised data from his Holyrood-issued iPad to watch football matches while on holiday in Morocco, incurring a roaming bill of nearly £11,000.
Initially stating that the device was solely used for parliamentary duties during the family trip in December and early January, Matheson later admitted that he had recently discovered his family’s involvement but chose not to reveal this information initially to safeguard his children.
In an emotional personal statement to the Scottish parliament, Matheson mentioned that he disclosed the truth to Yousaf on Tuesday (14).
Subsequently, the first minister declared the matter as resolved despite this new revelation.
Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s Broadcasting House on Sunday, Yousaf indicated that Matheson had only utilised the iPad himself for parliamentary purposes and had recently learned of his sons’ use of the data at the end of last week.
Yousaf said, there’s a legitimate question around whether he should have been forthcoming publicly at that time regarding why he chose to reimburse the entire bill.
“He was trying to protect his children from media scrutiny.”
He continued to stand by Matheson’s character, stating, “For me, Michael — who I’ve known for well over 15 years — is a man of integrity, honesty. He should have handled the situation better, Michael knows that and he’s apologised for that.”
Responding to whether Matheson misled him during the incident, Yousaf said, “No, I don’t believe Michael did [mislead me], as I say he’s a man I know of pure honesty and integrity.”
Douglas Ross, the Scottish Conservative leader, criticised Matheson, suggesting that he was avoiding public scrutiny. The Moray MP remarked that only his party could introduce a motion of no confidence in the health secretary.
On BBC Scotland’s The Sunday Show, Ross highlighted the absence of Yousaf, Matheson, or the deputy first minister on the programme. He remarked that this was impacting all levels of government in Scotland, emphasising the lack of willingness to address significant matters.
Ross suggested that their absence reflected an inability to defend the health secretary, whom he believed should have resigned by now, indicating that Yousaf should have sacked him.
Before Humza's Broadcasting House appearance, Ross indicated, it's evident that the SNP is apprehensive about the Matheson scandal.
He said it's unacceptable that neither the health secretary nor Yousaf are willing to address this issue, considering the former's repeated lies and the first minister's involvement in a cover-up.
He also highlighted Shona Robison's (deputy first minister) cancelled interview, suggesting that her avoidance reflected the broader impact of the scandal on the entire SNP government, rather than just the health secretary's attempt to avoid public scrutiny by skipping ministerial engagements.
“The SNP must agree to Scottish Conservative demands for a debate in parliament this week because there are so many key questions that remain unanswered,” he said.
On The Sunday Show, Anas Sarwar, the Scottish Labour leader, reiterated his demand for Matheson's resignation. “I don’t think the first minister or the parliament should have any confidence in Michael Matheson, he should resign,” he said.
“He says he found out the truth on Thursday, but he continued to tell mistruths to the public for days after. He says he told the first minister on Tuesday, the first minister also told mistruths the day after as well. That’s not acceptable in public life.”
UK music industry continue to face systemic barriers that hinder progress, visibility, and career growth – despite decades of contribution and cultural influence, a new report has revealed.
The study, South Asian Soundcheck, published last Tuesday (7), surveyed 349 artists and professionals and found that while many are skilled and ambitious, structural obstacles are still holding them back.
Prepared by Lila, a charity focused on empowering south Asian artists and music professionals, the survey showed that nearly three-quarters of respondents earn some income from music, but only 28 per cent rely on it full time.
More than half struggle to access opportunities or funding, and many said they lack industry networks or knowledge about contracts and rights.
Beyond structural issues, almost half said they face stereotypes about the kind of music they should make; two in five encounter family doubts about music as a career, and one in three has experienced racial discrimination.
Although 69 per cent said there was progress in visibility, but 68 per cent still feel invisible within the industry.
Respondents sought urgent action, including mentorship and networking opportunities, stronger south Asian representation in key industry roles and fairer access to funding.
Veteran musician and composer Viram Jasani, who chaired the Asian Music Circuit and led a national enquiry into south Asian music in 1985, told Eastern Eye the findings were “disheartening”.
“I read the report and my heart sank – it feels as though nothing has changed,” he said.
“Back in 1985, we had already identified the same problems and made clear recommendations for better representation, employment and long-term support. Four decades later, we are still talking about the same issues.”
Jasani, a sitar, tabla and tambura expert, said the report focused mainly on modern genres and overlooked traditional south Asian music, which he believes is central to cultural identity.
“Since colonial times, British attitudes have not changed much,” he said. “If they can erase Indian traditional culture and create a community that lives entirely within an English cultural bubble, then they will have succeeded.”
He added that young south Asian artists were often drawn to Western contemporary music, while neglecting their own heritage.
“We are brilliant in Western genres, but that should come after we are grounded in our traditional shashtriya sangeet (classical music),” he said. “Without that foundation, we lose our sense of identity.”
Jasani also warned a lack of unity within the south Asian community continues to weaken its cultural progress.
He said, “People compete with each other while the world watches. For too long, massaging egos has taken priority over producing the best of our culture.”
According to the survey, one in three has experienced direct racial discrimination. One respondent said, “There are virtually no visible and successful south Asian artists in the mainstream – people simply do not know where to place us.”
Another added: “I want south Asian artists to be part of the collective mainstream industry, not just put on south Asian-specific stages or events.”
While the visibility of south Asian artists has improved, with more names appearing on festival line-ups and in the media, the study revealed this progress remains “surface level”.
Lila’s founder, Vikram Gudi, said the findings show progress has not yet been translated into structural inclusion.
“The data exposes what we call the progress paradox. Seventy-three per cent of the people we surveyed earn some money from music, but only 27 per cent earn enough to rely on it as a sustainable career,” he said.
“The Soundcheck gives us the evidence to enact real change and identifies three essential needs – mentorship, representation, and investment.”
Three-quarters of participants said mentorship from experienced professionals would make the biggest difference to their careers. Many stressed the importance of being guided by people who “understand how the industry works and can connect them to decision-makers”.
Nearly the same proportion called for greater south Asian representation across the music industry – not just on stage, but within executive, programming and production roles at festivals, venues, record labels and streaming services.
Dedicated funding also emerged as a priority, with many describing the current grant systems as inaccessible or ill-suited to the diverse and cross-genre work that defines south Asian creativity today.
Two in five respondents reported that family or community resistance remains a challenge, often due to the perceived instability of a music career. The report argued this scepticism is “economically logical”, when there are so few visible south Asian success stories in the mainstream.
Responding to the report, Indy Vidyalankara, member of the UK Music Diversity Taskforce and BPI Equity & Justice Advisory Group, said: “South Asian music is rich, vibrant, and hugely influential. We need south Asian representation at every level of the ecosystem, plus support and investment to match that influence.”
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.