Remembering SP Hinduja: How ‘Hinduja onions’ got the Shah of Iran out of trouble
The story of 500 trucks transporting onions and potatoes through three countries, navigating the challenges posed by a particular prime minister’s ‘game’ and arcane laws in one of the countries
By Amit RoyMay 25, 2023
Srichand Hinduja (SP) interacted with many world leaders – among them Sir Edward Heath, Sir John Major, Tony Blair, George HW Bush, Morarji Desai and Indira Gandhi.
Indeed, SP was in the habit of sending briefs with his thoughts to heads of government. Quite often these were on how to improve relations with India. But I found SP’s account of how he and his brothers had got the Shah of Iran out of trouble perhaps the most entertaining.
This, in his own words, was the story SP told me: “In the early 1970s, Iran was faced with a crisis – a shortage of onions. The common man depended on onions for most Iranian dishes. Now the price had shot up from one toman a kilo to 15-16 tomans a kilo – in those days a dollar was worth about seven tomans. There was a big hue and cry among Iranians, ‘Why can’t we get onions?’
“What made it worse was there was also an onion shortage among the usual suppliers, Turkey being one of them. There was a similar shortage of potatoes.
SP Hinduja (R) with Manmohan Singh when he was India’s finance minister
“The Shah of Iran summoned his commerce minister who said weakly, ‘Your Majesty, we can’t get any onions.’ ‘Have you inquired from the Hindujas?’ wondered the Shah. By then, we had a reasonable presence in Iran. The Shah then snapped, ‘Go and place the order with them.’
“The order was for 200,000 tonnes of onions and 200,000 tonnes of potatoes. There was only one catch: they had to be delivered within 14 days. The minister rang Gopi, my younger brother who was then based in Teheran.
“I was in Bombay when Gopi telephoned with the news. My first reaction was shock, since we had never before dealt in either onions or potatoes.
“As luck would have it, India that year had produced bumper crops of both. Since they were perishable, farmers were throwing them out by the heapful.
“I telephoned Gopi to say that there were plenty of potatoes and onions around, but it would be difficult to get the required quantities out through the Indian ports in time because of congestion at our end. There was only one solution – to send them via the land route. But would Pakistan agree?
“The Shah was on cordial terms with Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, the prime minister of Pakistan. So we suggested that perhaps His Majesty would be kind enough to have a quick word with his good friend, Mr Bhutto. The telephone call was presumably made because 500 spacious air-conditioned trucks were cleared for the journey from Iran through Pakistan to India.
“But Bhutto was also playing a game – for at the last minute, he raised an objection: ‘I don’t want any Indian drivers.’
“There was nothing for it, but to hire a jumbo jet, recruit drivers in South Korea and fly them to the trucks. A couple of days later, the trucks arrived on the Pakistan-India border.
“Then Indian bureaucracy intervened. The customs officer on the border said: ‘You cannot take the trucks into India. You first have to pay a 350 per cent bond guarantee on each truck that they will go back the way they came. You say you are planning to take 500 trucks inside. Who knows when – or if – you will bring them back?’
“To pay import tax of 350 per cent on the value of each truck wasn’t a joke. And there were 500 trucks. The tax payable would easily exceed the value of the consignment we were moving. The idea that I would flog 500 trucks sent by the Shah to customers in India was preposterous.
“I flew to Delhi where I knew the prime minister’s powerful principal secretary, PN Haksar, and even Indira Gandhi herself.
“Haksar, whom I admired greatly, was sympathetic. ‘Look, SP, I’ll try, but my hands are tied. This is our policy on imported vehicles. We could try and amend the policy but that would take time, months, perhaps years.’
SP (R) with Sir Edward Heath
“In our London office at that time, we had a manager by the name of Krishna Golikari. I instructed him to telex me a bond paying the 350 per cent tax drawn on the British Bank of the Middle East. After the bond was paid, the trucks were released and arrived in a storm of dust in the Punjab city of Jalandhar.
“We bought what we needed direct from the farmers, paying them up to 50 rupees a quintal (in those days, 13 rupees was worth a pound and 100 kilos made up a quintal). We worked round the clock, buying from places such as Pune and Nasik.
“Some people advised us the Shah was making billions from the sale of oil and that we should sting him for the highest possible figure. We found it easy to reject that suggestion and we kept to the contract. Twelve days after the order, the ‘Hinduja onions and potatoes’ were in the provincial markets of Iran.
“Later we heard that the minister telephoned the Shah and said, ‘You were right, Your Majesty, the Hindujas have performed.’
“The Shah then issued instructions for an ex-gratia payment to be made to us. The minister ran to us waving a fat cheque. ‘His Majesty has given this to you as a little extra,’ he gushed.
“Our response was courteous, but firm, ‘Will you thank His Majesty for his generosity? He should not misunderstand us, but we cannot accept. We have performed our duty.’
“As a result of the onions business, the Shah developed a great deal of confidence in us. But our move was not intended to be a ploy. Getting the onions to him was a challenge and the more difficult it became, the more I was determined to ensure the job was done, especially as we had more or less promised the Shah we would deliver.
“The Iranians also agreed to give oil to India on favourable terms. India received five years credit with a two-year moratorium. It represented a dramatic turnaround in relations. We convinced the Shah it would be better for Iran to have friendly relations with India. We also persuaded the Shah and Mrs Gandhi to exchange small gifts on birthdays. Mrs Gandhi sent mangoes.
“As business developed between Iran and India, in cement, sugar, rails, wagons, steel, textiles, and jute, the Shah felt more confident that he would get the right quality if it was channelled through the Hindujas.
“I think I contributed to improving relations between Iran and India. It is only possible to do that when you don’t ask for favours for yourself which diminishes your status. In one year, I flew 66 times between the two countries.
“Although we had access to the Shah, Mrs Gandhi and other leaders, we have always believed in keeping a distance – ‘retain a distance from the king, from the elements, from the fire and the ocean, because if the regime changes, they can hang you’. This is a basic Vedic principle.”
In London, the Hindujas had an office at 29, Museum Street, opposite the British Museum, since 1962, “but in 1979, we moved our global headquarters to London”. SP had a lot of time for Mrs Thatcher who “understood politics as well as economics. I gave the concept of the Indo-British partnership to her.
“At first, her ministers, including Michael Heseltine and Douglas Hurd, did not take much interest, but later they did, when they realised she was serious.
“At one Diwali function, she deputed John Major – who was then not a senior minister. When she saw my expression of disappointment, she reassured me, ‘Listen, he’s the future prime minister.’”
SP said he persuaded then US president Bill Clinton to change his attitude to India.
SP (L) meets Rajiv and Sonia Gandhi during one of their visits to London in the early 1980s
“At a time when Bill Clinton was anti-Indian, we got Tony Blair to change his mind by organising a meeting between Blair and Brajesh Mishra, the national security adviser who had come with a brief from [then Indian prime minister] Atal Bihari Vajpayee.
“Clinton was anti-Indian because of India’s refusal to sign the non-nuclear proliferation treaty. I sent Blair a memo outlining how the real rival to the west was not India, but China. Blair then met Clinton who understood what the British prime minister was saying.
“I was with Brajesh Mishra at Downing Street when he met Blair and handed over Vajpayee’s letter. This was subsequently handed over to Clinton by Blair.”
SP also “met Prince Charles at Kensington Palace where he said he wanted to eat the vegetarian food I had taken. Later he became a patron of the Hinduja Cambridge Trust which brings students from India to the university.
Since April 2024, British citizens and settled residents have needed to earn at least £29,000 to apply for a partner visa. (Representational image: iStock)
THE UK’s independent Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has said the government could lower the minimum income requirement for family visas but warned that doing so would likely increase net migration by around 1 to 3 per cent.
Since April 2024, British citizens and settled residents have needed to earn at least £29,000 to apply for a partner visa.
The MAC has proposed a new threshold of between £23,000 and £25,000, which it said would still allow families to support themselves without needing to earn above minimum wage.
It also suggested that setting the threshold between £24,000 and £28,000 could prioritise economic wellbeing over family life.
The panel opposed the previously announced plan to raise the threshold to £38,700, calling it incompatible with human rights obligations, including Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
MAC chair Prof Brian Bell said the final decision was political but urged ministers to consider the impact of financial requirements on families.
The report recommended keeping the income threshold the same across all UK regions and not raising it for families with children.
Campaigners criticised the lack of a recommendation to scrap the threshold entirely.
The Home Office said it would consider the MAC’s findings and respond in due course.
By clicking the 'Subscribe’, you agree to receive our newsletter, marketing communications and industry
partners/sponsors sharing promotional product information via email and print communication from Garavi Gujarat
Publications Ltd and subsidiaries. You have the right to withdraw your consent at any time by clicking the
unsubscribe link in our emails. We will use your email address to personalize our communications and send you
relevant offers. Your data will be stored up to 30 days after unsubscribing.
Contact us at data@amg.biz to see how we manage and store your data.
Forsyth’s reporting took him to politically volatile regions
Frederick Forsyth, the internationally renowned author of The Day of the Jackal, has passed away at the age of 86. His agent, Jonathan Lloyd, confirmed the news, describing Forsyth as one of the world’s greatest thriller writers.
With a career spanning more than five decades, Forsyth penned over 25 books, selling 75 million copies worldwide. His work, including The Odessa File and The Dogs of War, set the standard for espionage and political thrillers. Bill Scott-Kerr, his publisher, praised Forsyth’s influence, stating that his novels continue to define the genre and inspire modern writers.
From fighter pilot to novelist
Born in Kent in 1938, Forsyth lived a life as thrilling as his novels. He joined the Royal Air Force (RAF) at 18, becoming one of the youngest pilots in the service. However, his passion for writing led him into journalism, where he worked as a foreign correspondent for Reuters and the BBC.
Forsyth’s reporting took him to politically volatile regions, including Biafra during the Nigerian Civil War. His experiences there deeply affected him, shaping the narratives of many of his future works. In 2015, he revealed that he had worked with British intelligence agency MI6 for over 20 years, drawing on his real-life encounters with espionage for his novels.
The birth of The Day of the Jackal
Forsyth’s literary breakthrough came in 1971 when he published The Day of the Jackal. At the time, he was struggling financially and decided to write a novel as a way out of his difficulties.
“I was skint, in debt, no flat, no car, no nothing, and I just thought, ‘How do I get myself out of this hole?’” Forsyth later recalled. “And I came up with probably the zaniest solution – write a novel.”
Set in 1963, the book tells the gripping story of an English assassin hired to kill French President Charles de Gaulle. It quickly became a bestseller and was adapted into a film in 1973, starring Edward Fox. The novel’s impact continued decades later, with a TV adaptation starring Eddie Redmayne released in 2024.
An enduring literary legacy
Forsyth’s ability to blend real-world political intrigue with compelling fiction cemented his reputation. His follow-up novel, The Odessa File (1972), explored Nazi war criminals and was later adapted into a film starring Jon Voight.
Other major works include The Fourth Protocol (1984), which became a successful film starring Michael Caine and Pierce Brosnan, and The Dogs of War (1974), inspired by mercenary conflicts in Africa.
His latest novel, Revenge of Odessa, co-written with Tony Kent, is set to be published this August.
Tributes from colleagues and admirers
Following Forsyth’s death, tributes poured in from fellow authors, entertainers, and public figures.
Jonathan Lloyd reflected on Forsyth’s extraordinary life, recalling how they had recently watched a documentary on his career, In My Own Words, set to air later this year on BBC One.
Bill Scott-Kerr described working with Forsyth as one of the highlights of his career, praising his professionalism and meticulous approach to storytelling. Forsyth’s background in journalism, he noted, gave his novels a sharp sense of realism and ensured they remained contemporary and engaging.
Forsyth was awarded a CBE for services to literature in 1997Getty Images
Singer Elaine Paige, a personal friend, expressed her sadness, calling Forsyth’s knowledge of world affairs unparalleled. Andrew Lloyd Webber, who collaborated with Forsyth on Love Never Dies, the sequel to Phantom of the Opera, thanked him for his ability to craft stories that will endure for generations.
Conservative MP Sir David Davis, who considered Forsyth a close friend, described him as a man of honour, patriotism, and courage, as well as an outspoken defender of the armed forces.
Recognition and personal life
Forsyth was awarded a CBE for services to literature in 1997, honouring his immense contribution to British storytelling.
He was married twice and had two sons with his first wife, Carole Cunningham. His second wife, Sandy Molloy, passed away in October 2024, just months before his death.
Passing marks
Frederick Forsyth’s influence on thriller writing is undeniable. From his groundbreaking debut with The Day of the Jackal to his final works, he leaves behind a literary legacy that will continue to captivate readers for years to come. His ability to merge real-world intrigue with gripping narratives made his books essential reading for fans of espionage fiction.
Forsyth’s passing marks the end of an era, but his stories will live on, shaping the genre and inspiring new generations of thriller writers.
Keep ReadingShow less
The Canary Wharf business district including global financial institutions in London.
THE UK’s unemployment rate has increased to its highest level since July 2021, according to official data released on Tuesday, following the impact of a business tax rise and the introduction of US tariffs.
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said the unemployment rate rose to 4.6 per cent in the three months to the end of April. This was up from 4.5 per cent in the first quarter of the year.
The figures reflect the early effects of a business tax increase announced in the Labour government’s first budget in October. April also marked the beginning of a baseline 10 per cent tariff on the UK and other countries introduced by US president Donald Trump.
“There continues to be weakening in the labour market, with the number of people on payroll falling notably,” said Liz McKeown, director of economic statistics at the ONS.
“Feedback from our vacancies survey suggests some firms may be holding back from recruiting new workers or replacing people when they move on,” she added.
The data also showed a slowdown in wage growth. Analysts said the overall picture could encourage the Bank of England to continue cutting interest rates into 2026. The trend pushed the pound lower but supported gains in London’s stock market during early trade on Tuesday.
“With payrolls falling, the unemployment rate climbing and wage growth easing, today’s labour market release leaves us more confident in our view that the Bank of England will cut interest rates further than investors expect, to 3.50 per cent next year,” said Ruth Gregory, deputy chief UK economist at Capital Economics.
The Bank of England last reduced interest rates in May, cutting them by 0.25 points to 4.25 per cent.
Keep ReadingShow less
Keir Starmer had indicated last month that he would reverse the cuts. (Photo: Getty Images)
THE GOVERNMENT will reinstate winter fuel payments to millions of pensioners this year, reversing an earlier decision that had removed the benefit for most recipients in England and Wales. The move comes after months of criticism and political pressure on prime minister Keir Starmer.
After taking office in July, Starmer's Labour government had removed the winter fuel payments for all but the poorest pensioners as part of broader spending cuts.
The government said at the time that the cuts were necessary to address a gap in the public finances created by the previous Conservative administration.
Means-testing remains for wealthier pensioners
On Monday, the government announced it would restore the payments to 9 million pensioners. Only about 2 million people earning above £35,000 will remain excluded from the £200–£300 heating subsidy during the winter months.
The initial decision had faced opposition from dozens of Labour MPs and was seen as a factor in the party’s recent electoral setbacks, including gains made by Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party in local elections. Reform UK also leads in national opinion polls.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said the decision to exclude wealthier pensioners still stands and defended the initial cuts.
“Because of those decisions, our public finances are now in a better position, which means that this year we're able to pay the winter fuel payment to more pensioners,” she said.
Treasury costings and political fallout
The Treasury said the reversal would cost £1.25 billion, while means-testing the benefit would still result in savings of about £450 million. It added that the move would not lead to permanent additional borrowing and that funding plans would be set out in a budget later this year.
Speaking at a press conference in Wales, Farage claimed credit for the U-turn.
“The Labour government are in absolute state of blind panic, they are not quite sure what to do,” he said. “Reform are leading now much of their agenda.”
Starmer had indicated last month that he would reverse the cuts.
According to the Institute for Fiscal Studies, the earlier policy change had resulted in around 85 per cent of pensioner households losing access to the benefit.
(With inputs from agencies)
Keep ReadingShow less
The Conservative leader said she asks people to remove face coverings—whether burqas or balaclavas—when they attend her surgeries. (Photo: Getty Images)
KEMI BADENOCH has said she will not speak to women wearing burqas or other face coverings at her constituency surgery.
In an interview with The Sunday Telegraph, the Conservative leader said she asks people to remove face coverings—whether burqas or balaclavas—when they attend her surgeries.
Badenoch also said employers should have the right to ban staff from wearing burqas, stating, “Organisations should be able to decide what their staff wear.”
She said, “If you come into my constituency surgery, you have to remove your face covering. I’m not talking to people who are not going to show me their face.” She added, “There’s a whole heap of stuff that is far more insidious... things like first-cousin marriage… My view is that people should be allowed to wear whatever they want, not what their husband is asking them to wear or what their community says that they should wear.”
Afzal Khan, Labour MP and vice-chair of the all-party parliamentary group on British Muslims, criticised the remarks. He said: “Trying to outflank Reform UK on immigration or culture wars... erodes trust in politics itself.”
The issue was raised after Reform MP Sarah Pochin questioned Keir Starmer about banning the burqa. Nigel Farage has also called for a debate.
Zia Yusuf, chair of Reform, resigned over the issue but has since returned. He told The Sunday Times he might vote for a ban but said other issues were more urgent.
Chris Philp, shadow home secretary, said he had spoken to women in burqas in the past.