Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Historian David Starkey claims equality is overrated

The historian had made shocking comments about slavery while appearing as a guest on Darren Grimes’ “Reasoned” podcast

Historian David Starkey claims equality is overrated

During a literary festival debate, historian David Starkey expressed his belief that "human beings should not be equal" and argued that differences in strength and intelligence make equality an unrealistic goal.

Starkey also referred to human rights as a "catastrophe" and referred to Britain as a "quasi-apartheid society". Additionally, he cited ongoing debates about trans people and women to support his argument.


“The catastrophe has been we’ve introduced human rights, like gay rights, like black rights, like trans rights, because they are inherently divisive,” he said.

Starkey's recent comments on equality came three years after he was stripped of his honorary fellowship at the University of Cambridge and dropped by Harper Collins, following his "abhorrent" remarks about slavery.

The historian had made shocking comments about slavery while appearing as a guest on Darren Grimes' "Reasoned" podcast. He attempted to argue that slavery was not actually "genocide," as evidenced by the continued presence of Black people in Africa and Britain, and went on to suggest that "an awful lot of them survived."

These comments have been widely criticised for their dehumanising language towards Black people, with Starkey seemingly treating them as undesirable or even vermin-like. Given the highly offensive nature of his remarks, little analysis is needed as they are reprehensible on their own.

Attendees at the literary festival were reportedly taken aback by the invitation extended to Starkey to speak at the event.

The panel discussion at the Sheldonian Theatre was moderated by columnist Yasmin Alibhai-Brown and featured author and broadcaster Gary Younge, writer Kenan Malik, and entrepreneur Deborah Meaden of Dragon's Den fame.

Prior to the event, ticket-holders were invited to submit questions via email, and a representative selection of these questions was posed to the panel.

More For You

Britain's HS2 rail project costs soar to £100 bn, review blames design choices

The main contract was given out before designs were ready, with poor planning for managing risks

Getty Images

Britain's HS2 rail project costs soar to £100 bn, review blames design choices

Highlights

  • Original plan for 360km/h speeds created bespoke design that inflated costs beyond control.
  • First trains between London and Birmingham now expected from 2035, not 2033.
  • Project cost has soared from £32.7 bn in 2011 to potential £100 bn for reduced route.
Britain's high-speed rail project has gone badly wrong because officials tried to make it too ambitious and politicians kept pushing to continue despite rising costs, according to a damning government review.

Stephen Lovegrove, former national security adviser, told The Times that trying to build one of the world's fastest railways was a major mistake that caused HS2's problems from the start.

The decision to design tracks for speeds of 360km/h forced engineers to create highly specialised infrastructure that made costs spiral out of control.

Keep ReadingShow less